The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.
Abstract
We define mental contamination as the process whereby a person has an unwanted response because of mental processing that is unconscious or uncontrollable. This type of bias is distinguishable from the failure to know or apply normative rules of inference and can be further divided into the unwanted consequences of automatic processing and source confusion, which is the confusion of 2 or more causes of a response. Mental contamination is difficult to avoid because it results from both fundamental properties of human cognition (e.g., a lack of awareness of mental processes) and faulty lay beliefs about the mind (e.g., incorrect theories about mental biases). People's lay beliefs determine the steps they take (or fail to take) to correct their judgments and thus are an important but neglected source of biased responses. Strategies for avoiding contamination, such as controlling one's exposure to biasing information, are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the extent to which people have introspective access to psychological processes has been disputed”
From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson & Brekke 1994
In the citing paper
“The cognitive processes that engender psychological biases are thought to be nonconscious and, as such, inaccessible to introspection (Wilson & Brekke, 1994; Wilson et al., 2002).”
From Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot (2026) · cites this paper as Wilson & Brekke, 1994
In the citing paper
“Given that the cognitive processes that produce many psychological biases are inaccessible to introspection (Wilson & Brekke, 1994; Wilson et al., 2002)”
From Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot (2026) · cites this paper as Wilson & Brekke, 1994
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Armstrong, J. S., & Georgoff, D. M. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90019-2 · Cited by 18,339
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Self-citationMetacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Cassam, Q. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198826903.001.0001 · Cited by 328
Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497 · Cited by 326
Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.002 · Cited by 312
Including Mechanisms in our Models of Ascriptive Inequality
Reskin, B. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09467-0_4 · Cited by 305
Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot
Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00502-4 · Cited by 303
“Of those who received supraliminal thirst-related primes, 66% chose more Super-Quencher coupons.5 This lack of di! erence between the subliminal and supraliminal primes is consistent with arguments made by Bargh (1992) and by Wilson and Brekke (1994) .”
ResultNorm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.022 · Cited by 285
Erratic strategic decisions: when and why managers are inconsistent in strategic decision making
Mitchell, J., Shepherd, D. A., & Sharfman, M. P. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.905 · Cited by 290
“That is, like other errors in thinking (Wilson and Brekke, 1994), erratic decisions can result from erroneous beliefs about cognition and inadequate awareness of one’s decision-making processes.”
BackgroundToward a Broader View of Social Stereotyping.
Biernat, M. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.12.1019 · Cited by 282
The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Chang, E. P., & Pillai, R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000028 · Cited by 313
“…notices the need for updating (cf. Figure 1; also Ecker et al., 2010a; Guzzetti, Snyder, Glass, & Gamas, 1993; Hinze, Slaten, Horton, Jenkins, & Rapp, 2014; Marsh & Fazio, 2006; Rapp, Hinze, Kohlhepp, & Ryskin, 2014; Rapp & Kendeou, 2007, 2009; van den Broek & Kendeou, 2008; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundAttitude importance and resistance to persuasion : It's not just the thought that counts
Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.931 · Cited by 162
Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406921 · Cited by 302
“The area of construal priming is replete with demonstrations of motivated correction (e.g., Martin et al., 1990; Schwarz & Bless, 1992; Wegener & Petty, 1995; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundA Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes
Reskin, B. F., & Bielby, D. D. V. (2005) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330053148010 · Cited by 272
Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (2002) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10448-001 · Cited by 274
“There is now substantial evidence that we are in fact often not aware of our own mental processes (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994) or of what is guiding our daily moods, thoughts, and behavior (Bargh, 1997).”
BackgroundStewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208321269 · Cited by 269
Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299025004004 · Cited by 269
“People often underestimate the influence that stimuli have on their judgments (e.g., Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundAmodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.60 · Cited by 259
“Most previous models (e.g., Wegener & Petty, 1997; Wilson & Brekke, 1994 ) focus on the deliberative process of detecting the presence of bias and deciding to initiate control (but see Gollwitzer, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodComparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779943000044 · Cited by 266
Reducing the Expression of Implicit Stereotypes: Reflexive Control Through Implementation Intentions
Mendoza, S. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210362789 · Cited by 251
“Although much research in social psychology has focused on reflective forms of control (i.e., Wegener & Petty, 1997; Wilson & Brekke, 1994), recent research has demonstrated that neural processes associated with response control may be engaged without deliberation within a few hundred milliseconds…”
BackgroundA Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion
Teeny, J. D., Siev, J. J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1198 · Cited by 287
“That is, due to people’s general desire to hold accurate attitudes (Festinger, 1950; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986), under conditions of high elaboration, consumers are apt to try to identify and correct for any undesired influence they perceive could be biasing their judgments (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundMental Construal and the Emergence of Assimilation and Contrast Effects
Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42006-7 · Cited by 248
“…that individuals are usually motivated to form accurate representations of the world; they hence attempt to avoid contamination by irrelevant information that may be brought to mind by incidental influences (for discussions see Kunda, 1999; Strack & Hannover, 1996; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundMethod“I know, you know”: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults
Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38 · Cited by 246
“This suggests that EE fits readily the mold of what Wilson and Brekke (1994) described as a type of bias due to “mental contamination” (p. 117).”
BackgroundThe substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life.
Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0023527 · Cited by 244
The Automaticity of Race and Afrocentric Facial Features in Social Judgments.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Fallman, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.763 · Cited by 243
The Role of Interest in Understanding the Career Choices of Female and Male College Students
Morgan, C. L., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1010929600004 · Cited by 252
“perceived goal affordances and work goals ( Wilson & Brekke, 1994 ), future research can examine this relationship more directly.”
BackgroundFolkes, V. S., & Matta, S. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/422117 · Cited by 244
Campbell, M. C., Mohr, G. S., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.012 · Cited by 234
Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.014 · Cited by 235
A General Model of Preventive and Interventive Self‐Control
Hofmann, W., & Kotabe, H. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00461.x · Cited by 239
Affirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.
Sherman, D. K., Cohen, G. L., Nelson, L. D., Nussbaum, A. D., Bunyan, D. P., & Garcia, J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015451 · Cited by 223
Automatic sources of aggression
Todorov, A. T., & Bargh, J. A. (2002) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(00)00036-7 · Cited by 220
“Indeed, people seem to overestimate the influence of such subliminal stimuli, but to greatly underestimate the influence of more potent and far more prevalent supraliminal stimuli (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialSternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.630 · Cited by 223
Barr, D. J. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005 · Cited by 217
Evolving Judgments of Terror Risks: Foresight, Hindsight, and Emotion.
Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Lerner, J. S., & Small, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.2.124 · Cited by 218
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 215
When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.021 · Cited by 211
Crouch, R. C., & Quester, P. G. (2009) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.01.004 · Cited by 208
When Do Consumers Avoid Imperfections? Superficial Packaging Damage as a Contamination Cue
White, K., Lin, L., Dahl, D. W., & Ritchie, R. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0388 · Cited by 206
When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation.
Glaser, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.4.669 · Cited by 206
Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.
Duguid, M. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037908 · Cited by 200
11. The role of metacognition in social judgment
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 193
Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.013 · Cited by 195
Incidental environmental anchors
Critcher, C. R., & Gilovich, T. D. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.586 · Cited by 190
“Without a theory of how something might taint one’s judgment, there is no reason for people to correct for even the most salient stimulus (Wegener & Petty, 1997; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundTopolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0014678 · Cited by 200
How alike is it versus how likely is it: A disjunction fallacy in probability judgments.
Bar‐Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1119 · Cited by 192
The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.
Mellers, B. A., Stone, E. M., Atanasov, P. D., Rohrbaugh, N., Metz, S. E., Ungar, L., Bishop, M. M., Horowitz, M. C., Merkle, E. C., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000040 · Cited by 201
“This training module was informed by a large literature that investigates methods of debiasing (see Lichtenstein and Fischhoff, 1980; Soll, Milkman, and Payne, in press; and Wilson and Brekke, 1994, for reviews).”
MethodHarris, J. L., Brownell, K. D., & Bargh, J. A. (2009) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01015.x · Cited by 252
“Wilson and Brekke (1994), for example, propose several necessary conditions for individuals to defend against “mental contamination,” or the unwanted effects of external stimuli such as food advertising.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Malleable Meaning of Subjective Ease
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01686.x · Cited by 197
“The fact that we replicated the typical ease effect when ease was positive indicates that focusing participants’ attention on the meaning of their metacognitive experience did not in and of itself reverse the effect or lead to mental correction (e.g., Petty & Wegener, 1993; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundEase‐of‐Retrieval as an Automatic Input in Judgments: A Mere‐Accessibility Framework?
Menon, G., & Raghubir, P. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376804 · Cited by 184
Assessing the Social Influence of Television
Shrum, L. J. (1995) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365095022004002 · Cited by 182
Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners.
Kukucka, J., Kassin, S. M., Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001 · Cited by 180
Getting Explicit About the Implicit
Uhlmann, E. L., Leavitt, K., Menges, J. I., Koopman, J., Howe, M. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112442750 · Cited by 190
“Research shows that people have difficulty accurately identifying the influences on their attitudes and decisions, indicating severe limits to the accuracy of conscious introspection (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson, 2002; Wilson & Brekke, 1994; Wilson, Dunn, Kraft, & Lisle, 1989).”
BackgroundRationalizing Democracy: The Perceptual Bias and (Un)Democratic Behavior
Krishnarajan, S. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000806 · Cited by 192
“This process is similar to what has been termed “thought suppression” (Wilson and Brekke 1994) or “fact avoidance” (Gaines et al. 2007) in which rationalizers ignore conditions that create mental discomfort (Festinger 1957, 3).”
ResultBad acts, blameworthy agents, and intentional actions: Some problems for juror impartiality
Nadelhoffer, T. (2006) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869790600641905 · Cited by 176
The automaticity of emotional face-context integration.
Aviezer, H., Shlomo Bentin, A., Dudarev, V., & Hassin, R. R. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0023578 · Cited by 176
“Hence, participants might not be able to correct their perception simply because the faces look different to them (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundPersuasion and Attitude Change
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0515 · Cited by 178
Riemer, H., Shavitt, S., Koo, M., & Markus, H. R. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037666 · Cited by 174
“…1992], and the flexible correction model [Wegener & Petty, 1997]) treats contextual information, such as the characteristics of an endorser, as a separate, biasing, and contaminating source of input for which perceivers may need to correct when evaluating an object (see also Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundSaying no to unwanted thoughts: Self-focus and the regulation of mental life.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Milne, A. B. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.578 · Cited by 171
Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221148147 · Cited by 200
“Be it because they lack direct access to the processes that influence their perceptions and evaluations (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994; Wilson et al., 2002; see also Frantz, 2006; Pronin et al., 2004, 2006) or because they lack a reference for comparison that would be necessary to…”
BackgroundDeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.657 · Cited by 178
“…of this interaction at one standard deviation above and below the mean of the self-monitoring distribution (Aiken & West, 1991) indicated that the main effect of priming was signif- icant for low self-monitors (B 1.36), t(56) 2.07, p .04, but not for high self-monitors (B 0.98), t(56) 1.39, p .17.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBernstein, D. M., Thornton, W. L., & Sommerville, J. A. (2011) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2011.619466 · Cited by 168
“A variety of evidence points to potential limitations in adult's ToM, particularly in situations in which adults must ignore their own knowledge, in order to consider the mental states of another, naive individual (Apperly, Riggs, Simpson, Chiavarino, & Samson, 2006 ; Keysar, Lin, & Barr, 2003 ; Wilson & Brekke, 1994…”
BackgroundIndividual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.026 · Cited by 178
Inside the Planning Fallacy: The Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Time Predictions
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.016 · Cited by 169
Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions.
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.132 · Cited by 614
A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships
King, G., & Persily, N. (2019) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096519001021 · Cited by 170
Bargh, J. A. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0007 · Cited by 163
Gawronski, B. (2004) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000026 · Cited by 162
“The main goal of the present chapter is to review the available empirical evidence on the correspondence bias from the perspective of theory-based bias correction (cf. Strack, 1992; Wegener & Petty, 1997; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSource monitoring and memory distortion
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, & Johnson, M. K. (1997) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0156 · Cited by 163
“…are various ways in which source memory errors could occur (for recent reviews see Ceci & Bruck 1993; Johnson et al. 1993; Roediger 1996; Schacter 1995; Wilson & Brekke 1994): The schema-based inferences we make in simply comprehending events initially can later be misattributed to perception.”
BackgroundDebiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review
Ludolph, R. A., & Schulz, P. J. (2017) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x17716672 · Cited by 158
“In an effort to overcome the fragmentation of the field, various classification schemes have been proposed that offer a framework for the categorization of debiasing strategies.(6,9,10,14,15,18) Larrick,(10) for instance, suggested a distinction between motivational, cognitive, and technological strategies.”
BackgroundMethodEpley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027408.72713.45 · Cited by 157
“…the automatic nature of these egocentric evaluations leave no hint of subjectivity, attentional effort, or bias to stimulate judgmental correction (Wilson and Brekke, 1994), producing perceptions that appear to be caused by the stimulus itself rather than by the biased evaluations of the…”
BackgroundInfluentialKeltner, D. J., & Lerner, J. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001009 · Cited by 164
Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000290 · Cited by 173
“…their actions and the actual sources of their evaluations and subjective feelings about the external world (Bar-Anan et al. 2010; Nisbett & Wilson 1977; Wilson & Brekke 1994) – access they would be expected to have if they were consciously aware of making those choices and deciding what to do.”
Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., Shaffer, L. M., Chasteen, A. L., & Khan, S. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.277 · Cited by 155
Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W. C., & Hussy, W. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193073 · Cited by 156
“Thus, whenever a test requires people to report a highly integrated representation rather than single pieces of information, people may not rely on careful source monitoring to discount unwanted influences but on other discounting strategies, such as correction by contrast (see, e.g., Wilson & Brekke, 1994 ).”
BackgroundBiases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions.
Baron, J. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.122.1.72 · Cited by 156
“Whether they can do this may depend on their theories about the source of their judgments (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundBias in Favor of the Status Quo
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x · Cited by 172
“Bias is rarely recognized as such (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundEgalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control
Moskowitz, G. B., & Li, P. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.014 · Cited by 153
“Goals allow one to correct-for (e.g., Devine, Monteith, Zuwerink, & Elliot, 1991) or decontaminate (e.g., Wilson & Brekke, 1994) cognition from the biasing influence of an already-activated stereotype, overriding it with a more appropriate response (“putting the brakes on prejudice,” e.g.,…”
BackgroundThe Power of Strangers: The Effect of Incidental Consumer Brand Encounters on Brand Choice
Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/592944 · Cited by 161
“However, these processes might also operate without intention or awareness on the part of the observer.”
BackgroundAre we aware of the external factors that influence our food intake?
Vartanian, L. R., Herman, C. P., & Wansink, B. C. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.533 · Cited by 150
What Makes a Man Similar to a Tie? Stimulus Compatibility with Comparison and Integration
Wisniewski, E. J., & Bassok, M. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0723 · Cited by 147
“Verbalizing reasons for making such ratings may have changed the usual process by which people arrive at similarity judgments (see Wilson & Brekke, 1994, for a review of how cognitive processes are changed by verbalization).”
BackgroundGilbert, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.011 · Cited by 153
Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02300424 · Cited by 149
Feelings as Information: Moods Influence Judgments and Processing Strategies
Schwarz, N. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.031 · Cited by 149
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Self-Regulation of Priming Effects on Behavior
Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P., Trötschel, R., & Webb, T. L. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611411586 · Cited by 147
“Self-regulation of behavior-priming effects is difficult because, by definition, people do not realize when priming affects their behavior (Oettingen, Grant, Smith, Skinner, & Gollwitzer, 2006; Wilson & Brekke, 1984).”
BackgroundEffective Implementation of Metacognition
Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428.ch15 · Cited by 146
“described by Wilson and Brekke (1994) , such “mental contamination” can be difficult to avoid if”
BackgroundLaran, J., Dalton, A. N., & Andrade, E. B. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656577 · Cited by 147
The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000155 · Cited by 143
“…that the original misinformation has been refuted by later information is a necessary precondition for revising and updating one’s original beliefs about the cause of the outcome (Marsh & Fazio, 2006; Rapp, Hinze, Kohlhepp, & Ryskin, 2014; Rapp & Kendeou, 2007, 2009; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodEmotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review.
Feigenson, N. R., & Park, J. (2006) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z · Cited by 154
“... what does the research show about decision makers’ ability to reduce or eliminate those effects? Generally speaking, the research on debiasing (or correction) indicates that in order to purge judgments of unwanted bias, the decision maker must be (i) aware of the unwanted influence; (ii) motivated to correct the b…”
BackgroundWalking with the Scarecrow: The Information‐Processing Approach to Decision Research
Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470752937.ch6 · Cited by 144
“However, Wilson and Brekke (1994) suggest that correction processes may be relatively rare.”
BackgroundMitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching
Peterson, D. A. M., Biederman, L., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T., & Roe, K. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216241 · Cited by 140
“Overcoming the influence of implicit biases requires 1) awareness of the implicit biases, 2) the motivation to break the “habit” of their use, and 3) training in ways to overcome the implicit bias [15, 16, 18].”
BackgroundStapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & van der Pligt, J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1311 · Cited by 139
“…stimuli, the ambiguity of the target stimulus, and the timing of the priming episode—seems too complex to be explained in terms of demand characteristics or people's naive theories about how to correct for perceived bias (see Strack et al., 1993; Petty & Wegener, 1993; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
InfluentialHierarchical microaggressions in higher education.
Young, K. S., Anderson, M. R., & Stewart, S. (2014) · Journal of Diversity in Higher Education · doi:10.1037/a0038464 · Cited by 137
Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D. M., & Ochsner, K. N. (2003) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00347.x · Cited by 137
“Because behavior is often driven by automatic mechanisms, self-reports of mental processes are notoriously unreliable and susceptible to many forms of contamination (Bem, 1967; Wilson & Brekke, 1994 ).”
BackgroundFundamental Processes Leading to Attitude Change: Implications for Cancer Prevention Communications
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00284.x · Cited by 131
“If people believe that their thoughts are biasing in some way, they can adjust their judgments in a direction opposite to the implication of the thoughts (correction processes; Petty & Wegener, 1993; Wegener & Petty, 1997; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
ResultImplicit and Explicit Consequences of Exposure to Violent and Misogynous Rap Music
Rudman, L. A., & Lee, M. R. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005002541 · Cited by 135
“Because awareness of bias is the first step to counteracting it (e.g. Wilson & Brekke, 1994), manipulations that draw attention to people’s implicit stereotypes (Devine & Monteith, 1999; Monteith, 1993) or that teach them how to control for bias (Schaller, Asp, Rosell, & Heim, 1996) may prove…”
BackgroundRegulating the costs of empathy: the price of being human
Hodges, S. D., & Klein, K. J. K. (2001) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/s1053-5357(01)00112-3 · Cited by 131
“After exposure has occurred, attempts to restore oneself to a pre-exposure state are effortful (Gilbert, Pelham, & Krull, 1988) and often ineffective (Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundDeutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001 · Cited by 130
Children Are Cursed: An Asymmetric Bias in Mental-State Attribution
Birch, S. A. J., & Bloom, P. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03436 · Cited by 229
Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences
Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., McCormick, E., Min, H. L., Lebrecht, S., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096 · Cited by 183
“People exhibit numerous systematic biases in judgment (Tversky and Kahneman 1974, Kahneman et al. 1982, Nisbett and Ross 1980), many of which are due to unconscious processes (Morewedge and Kahneman 2010, Wilson and Brekke 1994).”
BackgroundChapter 1 The Introspection Illusion
Pronin, E. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-142
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2035370986
- Semantic Scholar
- 713d6a95d5409a9a7ffcd4ae4337078e4851ccf4
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041841-10)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH41841)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- mental contamination, judgment bias, automatic processing, source confusion, unconscious processes, metacognition
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Judgment, Mental Processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review