Cited by 141Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The Role of the Amygdala in Signaling Prospective Outcome of Choice

Open access
Kahn, Itamar, Yeshurun, Yehezkel, Rotshtein, Pia, Fried, Itzhak, Ben-Bashat, Dafna, Hendler, Talma·2002·Neuron

Abstract

Can brain activity reveal a covert choice? Making a choice often evokes distinct emotions that accompany decision processes. Amygdala has been implicated in choice behavior that is guided by a prospective negative outcome. However, its specific involvement in emotional versus cognitive processing of choice behavior has been a subject of controversy. In this study, the human amygdala was monitored by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects were playing in a naturalistic choice paradigm against the experimenter. In order to win, players had to occasionally choose to bluff their opponent, risk "getting caught," and suffer a loss. A critical period, when choice has been made but outcome was still unknown, activated the amygdala preferentially following the choice that entailed risk of loss. Thus, the response of the amygdala differentiated between subject's covert choice of either playing fair or foul. These results support a role of the amygdala in choice behavior, both in the appraisal of inherent value of choice and the signaling of prospective negative outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00626-8

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amygdala is implicated in processing fear and threat, as well as in anticipation and experience of monetary loss.

    “an idea motivated by a large literature implicating this brain structure in processing fear and threat (9), as well as in anticipation and experience of monetary loss (10).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, I., Yeshurun, Y., Rotshtein, P., Fried, I., Ben-Bashat, D., & Hendler, T.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hendler, Talma
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
983-994
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139592302
Cited by
141
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 51 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
amygdala, choice behavior, decision-making, emotional processing, cognitive processes, risk of loss, bluffing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Animals, Choice Behavior, Emotions, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review