Cited by 234Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Self-affirmation reduces smokers' defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels.

Harris, Peter R., Mayle, Kathryn, Mabbott, Lucy, Napper, Lucy·2007·Health Psychology

Abstract

Objective Little is known about how smokers respond to graphic images depicting the health consequences of smoking. The authors tested whether smokers respond defensively to such images and whether allowing them to self-affirm reduces their defensiveness. Design Young smokers (N = 87) were randomly allocated to self-affirm or perform a control task prior to viewing 4 images intended for future use on cigarette packs in the European Union. Measures were taken immediately postexposure and after 1 week. Main outcome measures Participants rated each image for threat and personal relevance. Once all 4 images had been viewed, they completed measures of intentions, self-efficacy, and perceived behavioral control for reducing cigarette consumption, negative thoughts and feelings about smoking, personal vulnerability to 6 smoking-related diseases, desire to quit, and plans to quit. At the 1-week follow-up, measures of self-reported smoking and desire to reduce consumption were taken. Results Relative to controls, self-affirmed participants rated the images as more threatening and personally relevant, and they reported more negative thoughts and feelings and higher levels of control, self-efficacy, and intentions. Risk level moderated the effect of self-affirmation on relevance and intentions: Self-affirmation increased ratings on both measures among those who smoked more. In addition, self-affirmation moderated the threat-intention relationship, which was weaker in the self-affirmed g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.437

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to participants in a control condition, participants who first completed a self-affirmation-listing their desirable qualities-saw the advertisements as more distressing, expressed greater confidence in their ability to stop smoking, and had a stronger motivation to quit.

    “Relative to participants in a control condition, participants who first completed a self-affirmation-listing their desirable qualities-saw the advertisements as more distressing, expressed greater confidence in their ability to stop smoking, and had a stronger motivation to quit.”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris et al. 2007

  • However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will.

    “However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will (Harris et al. 2007, Harris & Napper 2005, Reed & Aspinwall 1998; for a review, see Harris & Epton 2010).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris et al. 2007

  • The effects of affirmation on attitude and motivation tend to persist, even one month later.

    “The effects of affirmation on attitude and motivation tend to persist, even one month later (Harris et al. 2007, Harris & Napper 2005).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris et al. 2007

  • This effect on motivation persisted one week later.

    “This effect on motivation persisted one week later.”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, P. R., Mayle, K., Mabbott, L., & Napper, L.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
437-446
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1997968660
Cited by
234
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
self-affirmation, graphic warning labels, cigarette packaging, smoking, defensive responding, threat appraisal, perceived personal relevance, self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, smoking cessation intentions, risk perception, young smokers
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Product Labeling, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Smoking, Nicotiana, Smoking Cessation, Self Efficacy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review