CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positive affect uniquely predicts lower risk of mortality in people with diabetes.

Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie, Epel, Elissa S., Acree, Michael·2008·Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.s73
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether positive affect predicts mortality among people with diabetes and among a comparison group of people with no chronic health conditions. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality. RESULTS: Positive affect was significantly associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in people with diabetes (N = 715). Enjoyed life was associated with lower risk of mortality over and above the effects of negative affect or other significant predictors of mortality. In a comparison sample without chronic illness (N = 2,673), positive affect was not associated with mortality. However, when the analysis was restricted to those over the age of 65, specific positive affects, in particular hopeful and enjoyed life were significantly associated with lower risk of mortality, again independent of negative affect. Enjoyed life remained significantly predictive of lower risk of mortality in the older sample when other predictors of mortality were statistically controlled. Positive affect was particularly protective among those over the age of 65 who reported higher levels of stress. CONCLUSION: These findings are discussed in light of possible stress-buffering functions of positive affect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.s73

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 192

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moskowitz, J. T., Epel, E. S., & Acree, M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2008-01
Volume
27
Issue
1, Suppl
Pages
S73-S82
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
DOI
10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.s73
OpenAlex
W2050445010
Cited by
191
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
positive affect, negative affect, diabetes mellitus, mortality, all-cause mortality, hope, stress buffering, older adults, chronic disease, emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude, Diabetes Mellitus, Emotions, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Health Behavior, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review