Cited by 291HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV Research and TreatmentHIV-related health complications and treatments

Positive Affect Predicts Lower Risk of AIDS Mortality

Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the association of positive affect as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) with risk of AIDS mortality, controlling for the other CES-D subscales and laboratory measures of disease progression. METHODS: Data come from the San Francisco Men's Health Study, a prospective study of a household probability sample of single men in San Francisco. The subjects were 407 men who were HIV+ at study baseline. RESULTS: In time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models, the positive affect subscale of the CES-D was significantly associated with lower risk of AIDS mortality (RR = 0.89, CI = 0.84-0.95). When risk estimates were adjusted for time-dependent covariates of CD4, serum beta2-microglobulin, P24 antigen, antiretroviral use, and the other subscales of the CES-D, positive affect remained significantly predictive of lower risk of AIDS mortality (RR = 0.90, CI = 0.85-0.97). When the CES-D subscale predictors were lagged by 12, 24, and 36 months in order to address the possibility that positive affect was simply a marker for better health, positive affect remained significantly predictive lagged by 12 months and marginally predictive lagged by 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Positive affect seems to be the "active ingredient" in the association of scores on the CES-D depressive mood scale and mortality in this sample of HIV+ men. Future work should expand the traditional negative-affect-only focus to encompass the significant role that positive affect plays in living with HIV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000073873.74829.23

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskowitz, J. T.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-07
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
620-626
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033600987
Cited by
291
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058069-04)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (N01-A132519, N01-A182515)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH58069)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
Keywords
positive affect, AIDS mortality, HIV, depression, CES-D, depressive mood, disease progression, CD4 count, beta2-microglobulin, p24 antigen, antiretroviral therapy, men's health
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adult, Affect, Depression, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review