Cited by 523Smoking Behavior and CessationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsGambling Behavior and Treatments

The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers.

Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, Will M., Jones, Heather A., Richards, Jerry B., Strong, David R., Kahler, Christopher W., Read, Jennifer P.·2003·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

In trying to better understand why individuals begin and continue to smoke despite the obvious health consequences, researchers have become interested in identifying relevant personality variables, such as risk taking. In this study, the authors compared the ability of 2 behavioral measures of risk taking, the Bechara Gambling Task (BGT) and the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), to differentiate smokers and nonsmokers. Self-report measures of impulsivity and sensation seeking were taken for comparison with the 2 behavioral risk-taking tasks. Results indicate that behavior on the BART, and not the BGT, was related to smoking status. Further, when considered in a logistic regression analysis, only the Sensation Seeking total score and the BART score contributed uniquely to the differentiation of smokers and nonsmokers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BART balloon pumping is positively associated with risky sexual behavior, smoking, and a composite of substance use, sexual behavior, delinquency, and health domains.

    “Previous studies found that balloon pumping on the BART was positively associated with risky sexual behavior (Lejuez et al. 2005), smoking (Lejuez et al. 2003), and a composite of substance use, sexual behavior, delinquency, and health domains (Lejuez et al. 2007).”
  • Alternative BART outcome measures have been used by other researchers.

    “It should also be noted that alternative BART outcome measures have been used by other researchers (e.g., Lejuez et al. 2003; Pleskac 2008) and our sample size prevented examination of potential sex or racial-ethnic differences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Jones, H. A., Richards, J. B., Strong, D. R., Kahler, C. W., & Read, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2003
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
26-33
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2029537564
Cited by
523
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA014699)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
Balloon Analogue Risk Task, risk-taking, smoking, sensation seeking, impulsivity, personality traits, gambling behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sex Characteristics, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review