Cited by 61Memory and Neural MechanismsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and Cessation

Nicotine and Hippocampus-Dependent Learning: Implications for Addiction

Open access
Gould, Thomas J.·2006·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

Addiction is a complex disorder because many factors contribute to the development and maintenance of addiction. One factor is learning. For example, drug-context associations that develop during drug use could facilitate drug craving upon re-exposure to contexts previously associated with drugs. Additionally, deficits in cognitive processes associated with withdrawal could precipitate relapse in attempts to ameliorate those deficits. Because addiction and learning involve common neural areas and cell signaling cascades, addiction-related changes in processes underlying plasticity may contribute to addiction. This article examines similarities between addiction and learning at the behavioral, neural, and cellular levels, with emphasis on the neural substrates underlying the effects of acute nicotine, chronic nicotine, and withdrawal from chronic nicotine on hippocampus-dependent contextual learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/mn:34:2:93

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [80]Rossebo OE, Gould TJ. Nicotine enhancement of cued trace fear conditioning but not cued delay fear conditioning in C57BL/6J mice. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 2003;89:1. [Google Scholar]
  2. [134]Broide RS, Leslie FM. The alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in neuronal plasticity. Mol. Neurobiol. 1999;20:1–16. doi: 10.1007/BF02741361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, T. J.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Gould, Thomas J.
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2006
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
93-108
ISSN
0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093132337
Cited by
61
References
167
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA017949, R01DA017949)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, hippocampus, contextual learning, addiction, drug craving, withdrawal, relapse, neuroplasticity, chronic nicotine exposure, signal transduction
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Neuronal Plasticity, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, MAP Kinase Signaling System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review