The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational thinking and cognitive sophistication: Development, cognitive abilities, and thinking dispositions.
Abstract
We studied developmental trends in 5 important reasoning tasks that are critical components of the operational definition of rational thinking. The tasks measured denominator neglect, belief bias, base rate sensitivity, resistance to framing, and the tendency toward otherside thinking. In addition to age, we examined 2 other individual difference domains that index cognitive sophistication: cognitive ability (intelligence and executive functioning) and thinking dispositions (actively open-minded thinking, superstitious thinking, and need for cognition). All 5 reasoning domains were consistently related to cognitive sophistication regardless of how it was indexed (age, cognitive ability, thinking dispositions). The implications of these findings for taxonomies of developmental trends in rational thinking tasks are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
VALIDITY OF THE TRAIL MAKING TEST AS AN INDICATOR OF ORGANIC BRAIN DAMAGE
Reitan, R. M. (1958) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 · Cited by 8,167
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202 · cited 1×
“In the present study, we examined denominator neglect (or ratio bias; see Reyna & Brainerd, 2008), belief bias in syllogistic reasoning (Evans, Barston, & Pollard, 1983; Markovits & Nantel, 1989), and base rate sensitivity (Bar-Hillel, 1980, 1990; Kahneman & Tversky, 1973).”
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,546
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271
Self-citationMiyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x · Cited by 3,784
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517
Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0016755 · Cited by 2,443
Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x · Cited by 2,253
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage.
Reitan, R. M. (1955) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044509 · Cited by 1,817
The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742 · Cited by 1,782
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47 · Cited by 1,725 · cited 1×
“…intelligence indices, but we also included measures of executive functioning because the latter are strongly associated with fluid intelligence (Duncan et al., 2008; Duncan, Schramm, Thompson, & Dumontheil, 2012; Kane & Engle, 2002, 2003; Kane, Hambrick, & Conway, 2005; Salthouse et al., 2003).”
(2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.001.0001 · Cited by 1,529
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x · Cited by 1,443
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.104 · Cited by 1,307
Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4 · Cited by 1,287
Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x · Cited by 1,244 · cited 3×
“The results of these studies were not completely convergent with those in a study by Reyna and Ellis (1994; see also Reyna et al., 2011; Reyna & Farley, 2006).”
The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments
Bar‐Hillel, M. (1980) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3 · Cited by 1,184
The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis
Kühberger, A. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2781 · Cited by 1,180
Executive Functioning as a Potential Mediator of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Normal Adults.
Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566 · Cited by 1,057
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1 · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationRationality and the Reflective Mind
Stanovich, K. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341140.001.0001 · Cited by 1,041
Self-citationExecutive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates.
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.05.002 · Cited by 1,007
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938 · Cited by 906 · cited 3×
“Three attribute framing situations were designed to be developmentally appropriate alternatives to tasks used with adult samples to study framing effects (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007). In the within-subjects design in this study, each framing situation had a positive and negative frame that was presented in separate…”
InfluentialIndividual differences in rational thought.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161 · Cited by 886
Self-citationOn the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196976 · Cited by 841
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Self-citationReasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342 · Cited by 767
Self-citationSternberg, R. J. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584152 · Cited by 615
Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized
Sternberg, R. J. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5593 · Cited by 589
Interference and inhibition in cognition
Dempster, F. N. (1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012208930-5/50002-7 · Cited by 577
Neys, W. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x · Cited by 564
Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention
Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0009 · Cited by 558
What intelligence tests miss: the psychology of rational thought
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5908 · Cited by 543
The development of conscious control in childhood
Zelazo, P. D. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.001 · Cited by 527
Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K. A., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947 · Cited by 517
Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2983 · Cited by 497
Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011 · Cited by 481
Decision‐making competence: External validation through an individual‐differences approach
Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.481 · Cited by 461
Why Schools Should Teach for Wisdom: The Balance Theory of Wisdom in Educational Settings
Sternberg, R. J. (2001) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3604_2 · Cited by 450
West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012842 · Cited by 416
Self-citationDual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.004 · Cited by 393
Outsmarting IQ: the emerging science of learnable intelligence
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2424 · Cited by 375
Sinatra, G. M., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch13 · Cited by 362
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780600780796 · Cited by 356
Self-citationEmerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research
Schneider, S. L., & Shanteau, J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609978 · Cited by 346
Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., & Pardo, S. T. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.752 · Cited by 341
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
Stanovich, K. E. (2004) · Cited by 316
Self-citationKokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00121-2 · Cited by 274
Self-citationFuzzy-Trace Theory and Framing Effects in Children's Risky Decision Making
Reyna, V. F., & Ellis, S. C. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00625.x · Cited by 271
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.453 · Cited by 264
Myside bias in thinking about abortion
Baron, J. (1995) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546789508256909 · Cited by 248
Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning.
Perkins, D. N. (1985) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.562 · Cited by 247
Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0062 · Cited by 245
Self-citationEveryday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence
Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052228-9 · Cited by 243
Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making
Klaczynski, P. A. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00319 · Cited by 230
Greater Attention Problems During Childhood Predict Poorer Executive Functioning in Late Adolescence
Friedman, N. P., Haberstick, B. C., Willcutt, E. G., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01997.x · Cited by 229
The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions
Markovits, H., & Nantel, G. (1989) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03199552 · Cited by 214
Thinking and deciding, 4th ed.
Baron, J. (2008) · Cited by 208
Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults.
Finucane, M. L., & Gullion, C. M. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0019106 · Cited by 202
The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003 · Cited by 202
Self-citationMemory, Development, and Rationality: An Integrative Theory of Judgment and Decision Making
Reyna, V. F., Lloyd, F. J., & Brainerd, C. J. (2003) · Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609978.009 · Cited by 186
: Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning
Handley, S. J., Capon, A. J., Beveridge, M. C., Dennis, I., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2004) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000051 · Cited by 184
Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults.
Reyna, V. F., Estrada, S. M., DeMarinis, J. A., Myers, R. M., Stanisz, J. M., & Mills, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0023943 · Cited by 183
Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from ages 5 to 85
Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Denburg, N. L. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.690 · Cited by 174
Goal neglect and Spearman's g: Competing parts of a complex task.
Duncan, J., Parr, A., Woolgar, A., Thompson, R., Bright, P., Cox, S. G., Bishop, S. J., & Nimmo‐Smith, I. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.131 · Cited by 170
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780701679764 · Cited by 168
Self-citationToplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.915 · Cited by 158
Self-citationThe Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice
Dhar, R. (1996) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199612)9:4 · Cited by 158
The Development of Rational Thought: A Taxonomy of Heuristics and Biases
Stanovich, K. E., Toplak, M. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00006-2 · Cited by 150
Self-citationThe Use of Judgement Heuristics to Make Social and Object Decisions: A Developmental Perspective
Jacobs, J. E., & Potenza, M. T. (1991) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01522.x · Cited by 137
The Representativeness Heuristic and the Conjunction Fallacy Effect in Children's Decision Making.
Davidson, D. Z. (1995) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · Cited by 130
Progress in Executive-Function Research
Aron, A. R. (2008) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00561.x · Cited by 123
Klaczynski, P. A., & Robinson, B. (2000) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.400 · Cited by 120
Levin, I. P., Hart, S. S., Weller, J. A., & Harshman, L. A. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.552 · Cited by 116
Task rules, working memory, and fluid intelligence
Duncan, J., Schramm, M. W. J., Thompson, R., & Dumontheil, I. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0225-y · Cited by 107
The adolescent brain: Learning, reasoning, and decision making.
(2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13493-000 · Cited by 99
Interference effects in memory and reasoning
Reyna, V. F. (1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012208930-5/50003-9 · Cited by 86
What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects
Maule, J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2006) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780600872585 · Cited by 83
How Children Reason about Gains and Losses: Framing Effects in Judgement and Choice
Schlottmann, A., & Tring, J. (2005) · Swiss Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.153 · Cited by 83
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.040 · Cited by 77
Self-citationThinking about personal theories: individual differences in the coordination of theory and evidence
Sá, W. C., Kelley, C. N., Ho, C., & Stanovich, K. E. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.07.012 · Cited by 76
Self-citationMorsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.08.003 · Cited by 75
When less is not always more: Stereotype knowledge and reasoning development.
Neys, W. D., & Vanderputte, K. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021313 · Cited by 70
Theoretical and forensic implications of developmental studies of the DRM illusion
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Zember, E. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0043-2 · Cited by 68
Simoneau, M., & Markovits, H. (2003) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.964 · Cited by 65
Bar‐Hillel, M. (1990) · Cited by 57
Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations
Aczél, B., Bagó, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., & Lukács, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770 · Cited by 53
Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Morsanyi, K. (2011) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.598401 · Cited by 50
'100% of anything looks good': The appeal of one hundred percent
Li, M., & Chapman, G. B. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.156 · Cited by 31
Money and fame: vividness effects in the National Basketball Association
Wang, L. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.609 · Cited by 16
Effect of Framing on Adolescents' Decision Making
Chien, Y.-C., Lin, C. Y., & Worthley, J. S. (1996) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1996.83.3.811 · Cited by 15
Reyna, V. F. (2011) · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test
Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007622 · Cited by 612
Critical Thinking as Discourse
Kuhn, D. (2019) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000500171 · Cited by 265
Actively open-minded thinking in politics
Baron, J. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004 · Cited by 199
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition
Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & García‐Retamero, R. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004952 · Cited by 173
The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
Stanovich, K. E. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13367.001.0001 · Cited by 152
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- James Madison University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1037-1048
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2116272087
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- John Templeton Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- rational thinking, cognitive sophistication, cognitive development, reasoning, belief bias, framing effects, intelligence, executive function, open-mindedness, superstition, need for cognition, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Aptitude, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Parents, Personality, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Superstitions, Thinking, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review