CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and Development

Relations between executive functions and academic outcomes in elementary school children: A meta-analysis.

Open access
Spiegel, Jamie A., Goodrich, J. Marc, Morris, Brittany M., Osborne, Colleen M., Lonigan, Christopher J.·2021·Psychological Bulletin
DOI 10.1037/bul0000322PMC PMC8238326
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to examine developmental patterns among the relations between components of executive function (EF; working memory [WM], inhibitory control, shifting), and academic outcomes (reading, mathematics, language) in elementary school-age children. These relations were examined within the context of the development of EF and of academic skills utilizing an extension of the unity and diversity, intrinsic cognitive load, and dual process theories. Using meta-analytic methods, we summarized results from 299 studies from 293 articles/dissertations, representing 65,605 elementary school-age children (42-191 months old [M = 101 months, SD = 24.49 months]). Results indicated that accounting for general EF (by including the correlations among EF tasks in meta-analytic path models and accounting for effects between all three EF components and academic outcomes simultaneously) produced weaker relations between EF and academic skills than the bivariate relations which have been reported in prior meta-analytic reviews. However, although reduced, all relations between EF and academic outcomes remained significant throughout elementary school. Whereas WM was consistently moderately associated with reading, math, and oral language across development, the developmental trends for the relations between inhibitory control and shifting with academic outcomes varied based upon the academic skill examined. On the academic side, whereas the relations between reading and language skills with EF components varied throughout elementary school, few developmental changes were found in the relations between EF components and math skills across elementary school. Future directions and implications of findings for the conceptualization of the impact of EF on academics are discussed within the context of relevant theoretical models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000322

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
  2. Baddeley A (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  3. Baddeley AD (1979). Working memory and reading. In Processing of visible language (pp. 355– 370). Springer, Boston, MA.
  4. Becker BJ (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In Tinsley HEA & Brown ED (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499– 525). Orlando: Academic Press.
  5. Bull R, & Lee K (2014). Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 36– 41.
  6. Cain K, Oakhill J, & Bryant P (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 31.
  7. Carver RP (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3– 43.
  8. Chandler P, & Sweller J (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293– 332.
  9. Cheung MWL (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Coltheart M (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In Snowling M & Hulme C (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 6– 23). Blackwell.
  11. DeStefano D, & LeFevre JA (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353– 386.
  12. Fisher Z, & Tipton E (2015). robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02220. · arXiv
  13. Friso-van den Bos I, van der Ven SH, Kroesbergen EH, & van Luit JE (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 10, 29– 44.
  14. Gough PB, & Tunmer WE (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and special education, 7(1), 6– 10.
  15. Jacob R, & Parkinson J (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 512– 552.
  16. Kieffer MJ, Vukovic RK, & Berry D (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333– 348.
  17. Lehto JE, Juujärvi P, Kooistra L, & Pulkkinen L (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59– 80.
  18. Lubin A, Vidal J, Lanoë C, Houdé O, & Borst G (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701.
  19. Maas CJM, Hox JJ, & Lensvelt-Mulders GJLM (2004). Longitudinal meta-analysis. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 38, 381– 389.
  20. Matthews JS, Ponitz CC, & Morrison FJ (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 101, 689.
  21. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, and Finfell B (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  22. Oakhill JV, & Cain K (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific studies of reading, 16(2), 91– 121.
  23. Paris SG (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading research quarterly, 40(2), 184– 202.
  24. Park S, & Beretvas SN (2019). Using total sample size weights in meta-analysis of log-odds ratios. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(3), 400– 414.
  25. Peng P, Namkung J, Barnes M, & Sun C (2016). A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics and Working Memory: Moderating Effects of Working Memory Domain, Type of Mathematics Skill, and Sample Characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 455– 473.
  26. Perfetti C (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4), 357– 383.
  27. Reznick JS, Morrow JD, Goldman BD, & Snyder J (2004). The onset of working memory in infants. Infancy, 6(1), 145– 154.
  28. Schmitt SA, McClelland MM, Tominey SL, & Acock AC (2015). Strengthening school readiness for Head Start children: Evaluation of a self-regulation intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 20– 31.
  29. Swanson HL, & Jerman O (2006). Math Disabilities: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249– 274.
  30. Viechtbauer W (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1– 48.
  31. Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Larose S, & Tremblay RE (2005). Kindergarten disruptive behaviors, protective factors, and educational achievement by early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 617– 629.
  32. Walczyk JJ (2000). The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 554– 566.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Spiegel, J. A., Goodrich, J. M., Morris, B. M., Osborne, C. M., & Lonigan, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2021-04
Volume
147
Issue
4
Pages
329-351
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
DOI
10.1037/bul0000322
PMC
PMC8238326
OpenAlex
W3173366033
Cited by
362
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 2
FWCI
52.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD052120)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
executive function, academic performance, elementary school students, working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, reading skills, mathematical ability, speaking skills, cognitive development, intrinsic cognitive load, dual-process theory
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Mathematics, Memory, Short-Term, Reading, Schools, Students, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review