Cited by 280Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and Development

The measurement of executive function at age 3 years: Psychometric properties and criterion validity of a new battery of tasks.

Willoughby, Michael T., The Family Life Project Investigators, Blair, Clancy B., Wirth, R. J., Greenberg, Mark·2010·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

In this study, the authors examined the psychometric properties and criterion validity of a newly developed battery of tasks that were designed to assess executive function (EF) abilities in early childhood. The battery was included in the 36-month assessment of the Family Life Project (FLP), a prospective longitudinal study of 1,292 children oversampled from low-income and African American families. Ninety-one percent of children were able to complete 1 or more of the tasks. Psychometric analyses were used to test the dimensionality of each task, evaluate the item and task properties, test the dimensionality of the task battery, and evaluate the criterion validity of the battery with multi-informant measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology and child performance on two subtests of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Results indicated that the tasks were successful in measuring interindividual differences in child EF ability, that task scores were most informative about ability level for children in the low to moderate range of ability, that children's performance across the entire battery was adequately summarized by a single factor, and that individual differences on the EF battery were related to ADHD symptomatology and intelligence in expected ways. Results are discussed with respect to the importance of developing psychometrically sound, scalable instruments that facilitate the measurement of interindividual differences in intraindividual change of EF across the early childhood period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018708

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive function was assessed with three tasks modeled on tasks previously used successfully with young children.

    “Executive function was assessed with three tasks modeled on tasks previously used successfully with young children. Full details on the executive function tasks are available in Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg (2010).”

    From Salivary cortisol mediates effects of poverty and parenting on executive functions in early childhood (2011) · cites this paper as Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg (2010)

  • Go/No-Go tasks can be administered to children as young as 3 years, depending on the nature of the task and the degree of inhibitory control required.

    “Depending on the nature of the task and the degree of inhibitory control required, Go/No-Go tasks can be administered to children as young as 3 years (M.T. Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg, 2010).”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as M.T. Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willoughby, M. T., The Family Life Project Investigators, Blair, C. B., Wirth, R. J., & Greenberg, M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2010-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
306-317
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2064915668
Cited by
280
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD51502; P01 HD39667)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
executive function, early childhood, three-year-old children, psychometric properties, criterion validity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD symptoms, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, low-income households, African American children, Family Life Project, individual differences, within-person change
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Black or African American, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Task Performance and Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review