Cited by 44Resilience and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStudent Stress and Coping

Coping and emotion regulation: A conceptual and measurement scoping review.

Open access
Trudel-Fitzgerald, Claudia, Boucher, Gabrielle, Morin, Clara, Mondragon, Pamela, Guimond, Anne-Josée, Nishimi, Kristen, Choi, Karmel W., Denckla, Christy·2024·Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

Abstract

The fields of coping and emotion regulation have mostly evolved separately over decades, although considerable overlap exists. Despite increasing efforts to unite them from a conceptual standpoint, it remains unclear whether conceptual similarities translate into their measurement. The main objective of this review was to summarize and compare self-reported measures of coping and emotion regulation strategies. The secondary objective was to examine whether other psychological measures (e.g., resilience) indirectly reflect regulatory strategies' effectiveness, thus representing additionally informative approaches. Results indicated substantial overlap between coping and emotion regulation measures. In both frameworks, two to eight individual strategies were usually captured, but only a third included ≤20 items. Most commonly evaluated strategies were reappraisal/reinterpretation, active coping/problem-solving, acceptance, avoidance, and suppression. Evidence also suggested psychological distress and well-being measures, especially in certain contexts like natural stress experiments, and resilience measures are possible indirect assessments of these regulatory strategies' effectiveness. These results are interpreted in the light of a broader, integrative affect regulation framework and a conceptual model connecting coping, emotion regulation, resilience, psychological well-being and psychological distress is introduced. We further discussed the importance of alignment between individuals, contexts, and strategies used, and provide directions for future research. Altogether, coping and emotion regulation measures meaningfully overlap. Joint consideration of both frameworks in future research would widen the repertoire of available measures and orient their selection based on other aspects like length or strategies covered, rather than the framework only.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cap0000377

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Aldao A, Sheppes G, & Gross JJ (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 263– 278. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arksey H, & O’Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 19– 32. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Benson L, English T, Conroy DE, Pincus AL, Gerstorf D, & Ram N (2019). Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use, variability, and flexibility: An experience sampling approach. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 1951– 1964. 10.1037/dev0000727 31464497 PMC7189626 · DOI
  4. Blanke ES, Brose A, Kalokerinos EK, Erbas Y, Riediger M, & Kuppens P (2020). Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life. Emotion, 20(3), 473– 485. 10.1037/emo0000566 30714776 · DOI
  5. Bonanno GA (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? The American Psychologist, 59(1), 20– 28. 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20 14736317 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bonanno GA, Pat-Horenczyk R, & Noll J (2011). Coping flexibility and trauma: The Perceived Ability to Cope With Trauma (PACT) scale. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3(2), 117– 129. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0020921 · DOI
  7. Boulanger JL, Hayes SC, & Pistorello J (2010). Experiential avoidance as a functional contextual concept. In Kring AM & Sloan D (Eds.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment (pp. 107– 136). Guilford Press.
  8. Bratman GN, Olvera-Alvarez HA, & Gross JJ (2021). The affective benefits of nature exposure. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15, e12630. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/spc3.12630 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Butler LD, & Nolen-Hoeksema S (1994). Gender differences in responses to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331– 346. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01420597 · DOI
  10. Campbell DT, & Fiske DW (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81– 105. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0046016 13634291 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Carver CS (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92– 100. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6 16250744 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Carver CS, Scheier MF, & Weintraub JK (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267– 283. 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267 2926629 · DOI
  13. Chen E, McLean KC, & Miller GE (2015). Shift-and-persist strategies: Associations with socioeconomic status and the regulation of inflammation among adolescents and their parents. Psychosomsomatic Medicine, 77(4), 371– 382. 10.1097/psy.0000000000000157 PMC5890430 26167560 · DOI
  14. Choi KW, Stein MB, Dunn EC, Koenen KC, & Smoller JW (2019). Genomics and psychological resilience: A research agenda. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(12), 1770– 1778. 10.1038/s41380-019-0457-6 31341239 PMC6874722 · DOI
  15. Compas BE, Jaser SS, Bettis AH, Watson KH, Gruhn MA, Dunbar JP, Williams E, & Thigpen JC (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(9), 939– 991. 10.1037/bul0000110 28616996 PMC7310319 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Compas BE, Jaser SS, Dunbar JP, Watson KH, Bettis AH, Gruhn MA, & Williams EK (2014). Coping and emotion regulation from childhood to early adulthood: Points of convergence and divergence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 71– 81. 10.1111/ajpy.12043 24895462 PMC4038902 · DOI
  17. Cutuli D (2014). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: An overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 175. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175 25285072 PMC4168764 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Davidson RJ (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. The American Psychologist, 55(11), 1196– 1214. 10.1037//0003-066x.55.11.1196 11280935 · DOI
  19. Denckla CA, Cicchetti D, Kubzansky LD, Seedat S, Teicher MH, Williams DR, & Koenen KC (2020). Psychological resilience: An update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11(1), 1822064. 10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064 33244362 PMC7678676 · DOI
  20. DeSteno D, Gross JJ, & Kubzansky L (2013). Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation. Health Psychology, 32(5), 474– 486. 10.1037/a0030259 23646831 · DOI
  21. Endler NS, & Parker JDA (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6(1), 50– 60. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/1040-3590.6.1.50 · DOI
  22. English T, & Eldesouky L (2020). Emotion regulation flexibility: Challenges and promise of using ecological momentary assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(3), 456– 459. https://doi.org/ 10.1027/1015-5759/a000581 · DOI
  23. Folkman S (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 839– 852. 10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.839 6737195 · DOI
  24. Folkman S, & Lazarus RS (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150– 170. 10.1037//0022-3514.48.1.150 2980281 · DOI
  25. Gratz KL, & Roemer L (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41– 54. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Greenaway KH, Louis WR, Parker S, Kalokerinos EK, Smith JR, & Terry DJ (2014). Successful coping for psychological well-being. In Boyle G, Saklofske DH, & Matthews G (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 322– 351). Elsevier.
  27. Gross JJ (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 551– 573. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/026999399379186 · DOI
  28. Gross JJ (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1– 26. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hackenbroich S, Kranke P, Meybohm P, & Weibel S (2022). Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials. Systematic Reviews, 11(1), 178. 10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6 36028879 PMC9413929 · DOI
  30. Hu T, Zhang D, Wang J, Mistry R, Ran G, & Wang X (2014). Relation between emotion regulation and mental health: A meta-analysis review. Psychological Reports, 114(2), 341– 362. 10.2466/03.20.PR0.114k22w4 24897894 · DOI
  31. James SA (1994). John Henryism and the health of African-Americans. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 18(2), 163– 182. 10.1007/BF01379448 7924399 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kalisch R, Muller MB, & Tuscher O (2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e92. 10.1017/S0140525X1400082X 25158686 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kato T (2015). Frequently used coping scales: A meta-analysis. Stress & Health, 31(4), 315– 323. 10.1002/smi.2557 24338955 · DOI
  34. Koval P, Kalokerinos EK, Greenaway KH, Medland H, Kuppens P, Nezlek JB, Hinton JDX, & Gross JJ (2022). Emotion regulation in everyday life: Mapping global self-reports to daily processes. Emotion, 23(2), 357– 374. 10.1037/emo0001097 35588386 · DOI
  35. Kraynak TE, Marsland AL, & Gianaros PJ (2018). Neural mechanisms linking emotion with cardiovascular disease. Current Cardiology Reports, 20(12), 128. 10.1007/s11886-018-1071-y 30311094 PMC6444345 · DOI
  36. Lazarus RS (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. McGraw-Hill.
  37. Lazarus RS, & Folkman S (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.
  38. Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Featherstone R, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf MI, Noel-Storr A, Paynter R, Rader T, Thomas J, & Wieland LS (2022). Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04
  39. Lewis MD, Granic I, & Lamm C (2006). Behavioral differences in aggressive children linked with neural mechanisms of emotion regulation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 164– 177. 10.1196/annals.1376.017 17347349 · DOI
  40. Mathur A, Li JC, Lipitz SR, & Graham‑Engeland JE (2022). Emotion regulation as a pathway connecting early life adversity and inflammation in adulthood: A conceptual framework. Adversity and Resilience Science, Online. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s42844-022-00051-3 PMC8863511 35224511 · DOI
  41. McMahon TP, & Naragon-Gainey K (2020). Ecological validity of trait emotion regulation strategy measures. Psychological Assessment, 32(8), 796– 802. 10.1037/pas0000827 32309970 · DOI
  42. Medland H, DeFrance K, Hollenstein T, Mussoff D, & Koval P (2020). Regulating emotion systems in everyday life: Reliability and validity of the RESS-EMA Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(3), 437– 446. https://doi.org/ 10.1027/1015-5759/a000595 · DOI
  43. Metais C, Burel N, Gillham JE, Tarquinio C, & Martin-Krumm C (2022). Integrative review of the recent literature on human resilience: From concepts, theories, and discussions towards a complex understanding. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 98– 119. 10.5964/ejop.2251 PMC8895705 35330859 · DOI
  44. Mezuk B, Abdou CM, Hudson D, Kershaw KN, Rafferty JA, Lee H, & Jackson JS (2013). “White Box” epidemiology and the social neuroscience of health behaviors: The Environmental Affordances Model. Society and Mental Health, 3(2). 10.1177/2156869313480892 PMC3820104 24224131 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Millgram Y, Sheppes G, Kalokerinos EK, Kuppens P, & Tamir M (2019). Do the ends dictate the means in emotion regulation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 80– 96. 10.1037/xge0000477 30247059 · DOI
  46. Nishimi K, Choi KW, Cerutti J, Powers A, Bradley B, & Dunn EC (2021). Measures of adult psychological resilience following early-life adversity: how congruent are different measures? Psychological Medicine, 51(15), 2637– 2646. 10.1017/S0033291720001191 32406816 PMC7863576 · DOI
  47. Nunez D, Villacura-Herrera C, Celedon K, Ulloa JL, Ramos N, Spencer R, & Fresno A (2022). Identifying self-report measures of emotion regulation and evaluating their psychometric properties: A protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(5), e056193. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056193 PMC9109083 35551079 · DOI
  48. O’Leary D, Suri G, & Gross JJ (2018). Reducing behavioural risk factors for cancer: An affect regulation perspective. Psychology & Health, 33(1), 17– 39. 10.1080/08870446.2017.1314480 28402140 · DOI
  49. Pearlin LI, & Schooler C (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2– 21. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2136319 649936 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, & Soares CB (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141– 146. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050 26134548 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Pisanti R, Melchiori FM, Lombardo C, Sagliano T, Violani C, Lazzari L, & Lazzari D (2015). Validation of the Italian Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations-Short Version among Hospital-Based Nurses. Psychological Reports, 117(2), 457– 472. 10.2466/08.03.PR0.117c22z1 26444831 · DOI
  52. Roohafza H, Askari M, Nouri F, Talaei M, Sarrafzadegan N, & Sadeghi M (2021). Do coping strategies really affect cardiovascular events? The Isfahan cohort study of adults in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 21(5), 483– 490. 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab110 34849720 · DOI
  53. Schatten HT, Allen KJD, & Armey M (2020). Assessment of emotion dysregulation using ecological momentary assessment. In Beauchaine TP & Crowell SE (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of emotion dysregulation (pp. 411– 426). Oxford University Press.
  54. Schneider S, Junghaenel DU, Gutsche T, Mak HW, & Stone AA (2020). Comparability of emotion dynamics derived from ecological momentary assessments, daily diaries, and the day reconstruction method: Observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e19201. 10.2196/19201 32969835 PMC7545330 · DOI
  55. Stanislawski K (2019). The Coping Circumplex Model: An integrative model of the structure of coping with stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 694. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00694 31040802 PMC6476932 · DOI
  56. Stevenson BL, Dvorak RD, Kramer MP, Peterson RS, Dunn ME, Leary AV, & Pinto D (2019). Within- and between-person associations from mood to alcohol consequences: The mediating role of enhancement and coping drinking motives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 813– 822. 10.1037/abn0000472 31657596 · DOI
  57. Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Neale JM, Shiffman S, Marco CA, Hickcox M, Paty J, Porter LS, & Cruise LJ (1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1670– 1680. 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1670 9654765 · DOI
  58. Sucharew H, & Macaluso M (2019). Progress notes: Methods for research evidence synthesis:The scoping review approach. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 14(7), 416– 418. 10.12788/jhm.3248 31251164 · DOI
  59. Svensson T, Inoue M, Sawada N, Charvat H, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Shimazu T, Yamaji T, Kawamura N, Shibuya K, Mimura M, Tsugane S, & group., J. S. (2016). Coping strategies and cancer incidence and mortality: The Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Cancer Epidemiology, 40, 126– 133. 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.003 26720912 · DOI
  60. Thompson RA (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25– 52. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1166137 7984164 · DOI
  61. Troy AS, Willroth EC, Shallcross AJ, Giuliani NR, Gross JJ, & Mauss IB (2022). Psychological resilience: An affect-regulation framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 547– 576. 10.1146/annurev-psych-020122-041854 PMC12009612 36103999 · DOI
  62. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Chen R, Lee LO, & Kubzansky LD (2022). Are coping strategies and variability in their use associated with lifespan? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 162, 111035. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111035 36152346 PMC10410682 · DOI
  63. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Guimond AJ, & Kubzansky LD ((in press)). Emotion regulation and cardiovascular health. In Ford BQ & Gross JJ (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  64. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Qureshi F, Appleton AA, & Kubzansky LD (2017). A healthy mix of emotions: Underlying biological pathways linking emotions to physical health. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 16– 21. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.003 · DOI
  65. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Reduron LR, Kawachi I, & Kubzansky LD (2021). Specificity in associations of anger frequency and expression with different causes of mortality over 20 years. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1, 402– 409. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000948 PMC8178222 33901055 · DOI
  66. Whittemore R, & Knafl K (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546– 553. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x 16268861 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Wolgast M, Lundh LG, & Viborg G (2011). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: An experimental comparison of two emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(12), 858– 866. 10.1016/j.brat.2011.09.011 21999941 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Woods-Giscombe CL, Allen AM, Black AR, Steed TC, Li Y, & Lackey C (2019). The Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associations with mental health and health behaviors in African American women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 40(8), 672– 681. 10.1080/01612840.2019.1584654 31081707 PMC7220093 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Yap Y, Bei B, & Wiley JF (2021). Daily coping moderates the relations between stress and actigraphic sleep: A daily intensive longitudinal study with ecological momentary assessments. Sleep Medicine, 88, 231– 240. 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.10.012 34798439 · DOI
  70. Zaid SM, Hutagalung FD, Bin Abd Hamid HS, & Taresh SM (2021). Sadness regulation strategies and measurement: A scoping review. PLoS One, 16(8), e0256088. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256088 34388181 PMC8362967 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Boucher, G., Morin, C., Mondragon, P., Guimond, A.-J., Nishimi, K., Choi, K. W., & Denckla, C.
Affiliations
  • Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
Published
2024-08
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7304
OpenAlex
W4389453627
Cited by
44
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Le dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation de l’Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal
  • National Institutes of Health (R25-AT0106641)
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs
  • San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH127413, K23MH117278)
  • Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
coping, emotion regulation, self-report measures, cognitive reappraisal, problem solving, acceptance, avoidance, emotional suppression, resilience, psychological well-being, psychological distress, conceptual overlap, measurement validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review