Cited by 191Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Relations between emotion regulation strategies and affect in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using ecological momentary assessments

Open access
Boemo, Teresa, Nieto, Ines, Vazquez, Carmelo, Sanchez-Lopez, Alvaro·2022·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is a central target in the study of psychological and neurobiological processes of emotions for numerous psychological disorders. Ecological momentary assessments, overcoming retrospective self-reports, allow a better understanding of the relation between the use of ER strategies and daily life affective experiences. A systematic review and meta-analyses of studies testing these relations through experience sampling methods (ESM) and daily diaries were conducted. ESM studies showed significant large effect sizes in contemporaneous relations between negative affect (NA) and rumination, suppression, and worry, and in both contemporaneous and prospective relations between positive affect (PA) and reappraisal; medium effect sizes in prospective relations between NA and rumination, and PA and distraction; and a small effect size in the prospective relation between NA and suppression. Daily diary studies showed significant large effect sizes in contemporaneous relations between NA and rumination and suppression, and in both contemporaneous and prospective relations between PA and reappraisal; medium effect sizes in contemporaneous relations between PA and acceptance, and problem-solving; and a small effect size in the prospective relation between NA and reappraisal. These findings shed light on the temporal relations between the use of ER strategies and affective experiences and highlight conceptual and methodological limitations in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104747

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Frijda, N.H., 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K.G., 1999. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Understanding and Treating Human Suffering. Guilford Press, New York.
  3. Kabat-Zinn, J., 1990. Full Catastrophe Livings. Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. Delacorte Press, New York.
  4. Zaborowski, R., 2019. Is pain an emotion? Some taxonomic considerations with a comparative review. Analecta XXVIII.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boemo, T., Nieto, I., Vazquez, C., & Sanchez-Lopez, A.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Boemo, Teresa
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
139
Pages
104747
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282973758
Cited by
191
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Docta Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Comunidad de Madrid (2017-T1 / SOC-5359)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CT17/17-CT18/17, PID2019, PID2019-108711GB-I00)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion regulation strategies, daily affect, negative affect, positive affect, rumination, emotional suppression, worry, cognitive reappraisal, distraction, acceptance, problem solving, ecological momentary assessment, daily diary
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Emotional Regulation, Affect, Emotions, Humans, Problem Solving, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review