The DOI matches its Crossref record.
They saw a game: A case study
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Princeton students saw the Dartmouth team commit twice as many flagrant penalties and three times as many mild penalties as their own team.Dartmouth students, on the other hand, recorded an approximately equal number of penalties by both teams.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)
In the citing paper
“The self-serving bias affects not only individuals' evaluations of themselves, but also of groups they are affiliated with.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)
In the citing paper
“Participants who did not receive a self-aYrmation judged the activist who shared their convictions more favorably than the activist who did not (see also Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Hastorf & Cantril, 1954
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 890
Ross, L. D., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Russell, A. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117557109 · Cited by 67
Spectators’ Evaluations Of Rival And Fellow Fans
Wann, D. L. L., & Dolan, T. J. (1994) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395919 · Cited by 66
Self-Anchoring in Conversation: Why Language Users Do Not Do What They “Should”
Keysar, B., & Barr, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.010 · Cited by 67
Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.018 · Cited by 66
Contracts as Reference PointsPreprint
Hart, O., & Moore, J. H. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.944784 · Cited by 69
Winegard, B. M., & Deaner, R. O. (2010) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491000800310 · Cited by 68
Pay-for-Performance: Toxic to Quality? Insights from Behavioral Economics
Himmelstein, D. U., Ariely, D., & Woolhandler, S. J. (2014) · International Journal of Health Services · doi:10.2190/hs.44.2.a · Cited by 65
Exploring the “Lost and Found” of Justice Theory and Research
Skitka, L. J. (2009) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-009-0089-0 · Cited by 67
“Hastorf and Cantril (1954) decided to interview students who saw the game, as well as a sample of those who viewed the game on film, and to ask them how they would characterize the game: was it fair?”
BackgroundMaking Climate-Science Communication Evidence-Based — All the Way DownPreprint
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2216469 · Cited by 71
“…of the correctness of certain disputed officiating calls made in a game between their schools’ respective football teams: the emotional stake the students had in experiencing solidarity with their peers had unconsciously affected what they saw in viewing a film of the game (Hastorf & Cantril 1954).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Team Identification on Biased Predictions of Player Performance
Wann, D. L. L., Koch, K., Knoth, T., Fox, D., Aljubaily, H., & Lantz, C. D. (2006) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395537 · Cited by 62
What Is Implicit Self-Esteem, and Does it Vary Across Cultures?
Falk, C. F., & Heine, S. J. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314544693 · Cited by 85
“…to view their friends, sports teams, spouses, countries, and fellow group members in highly positive terms and often engaging in the same kinds of selfdeceptive strategies to preserve their positive evaluations of them (e.g., Brown, 1986; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Murray, Holmes, & Griffin, 1996).”
BackgroundThe role of the medial prefrontal cortex in social categorization.
Molenberghs, P., & Morrison, S. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss135 · Cited by 57
“…associated with group membership, such difference in neural processing could be a result of evolution, in which our brains have developed to perceive the in-group and out-group differently (Hastorf and Cantril, 1954; Brewer and Caporael, 1990; Tobena et al., 1999; von Hippel and Trivers, 2011).”
BackgroundPeoples under threat: Americans, Arabs, and Israelis.
Pettigrew, T. F. (2003) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327949pac0901_03 · Cited by 62
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xyq7b · Cited by 71
A goal-centric outlook on learning
Molinaro, G., & Collins, A. G. E. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.011 · Cited by 63
Consequences of National Ingroup Identification for Responses to Immoral Historical Events
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106931.008 · Cited by 60
Commentary and viewer perception of player hostility: Adding punch to televised sports
Sullivan, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838159109364142 · Cited by 59
Denham, B. E. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00320.x · Cited by 62
On being a sore loser: How fans react to their team'S failure
Mann, L. (1974) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049537408254634 · Cited by 59
Perceptions of Media and Media Effects
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2012) · The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies · doi:10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems995 · Cited by 32
Jussim, L. J. (2005) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37001-8 · Cited by 62
An Attributional Analysis of Moral Judgments
Ross, M., & DiTecco, D. (1975) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00998.x · Cited by 58
Contracts as Reference PointsPreprint
Hart, O., & Moore, J. H. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.956999 · Cited by 52
Majority members misperceive even “win-win” diversity policies as unbeneficial to them.
Brown, N. D., & Jacoby-Senghor, D. S. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000372 · Cited by 58
Male pragmatism in negotiators’ ethical reasoning
Kray, L. J., & Haselhuhn, M. P. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.006 · Cited by 59
“Since Hastorf and Cantril's (1954) seminal study of divergent recollections of a football game among rival spectators, egocentrism's role in shaping social perception has been apparent. Dartmouth students seemed to have witnessed a different game than Harvard students. Recollections of key plays and perceptions of spo…”
BackgroundProbability Judgment across Cultures
Yates, J. F., Lee, J., Sieck, W. R., Choi, I., & Price, P. C. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.017 · Cited by 55
Neisser, U. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00042308 · Cited by 59
Epistemic motives moderate the effect of metaphoric framing on attitudes
Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.009 · Cited by 56
The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election
Schwalbe, M. C., Cohen, G. L., & Ross, L. D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912301117 · Cited by 54
The Selective Allure of Neuroscientific Explanations
Scurich, N., & Shniderman, A. B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107529 · Cited by 54
“In a classic study from the 1950s, students from two different Ivy League schools were asked to evaluate controversial calls made by an official during a football game; the students evaluated the legitimacy of the calls in a manner that was favorable to their institution, despite claims that their evaluations were neu…”
BackgroundRoese, N. J., & Maniar, S. D. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672972312002 · Cited by 55
Social Prediction and the “Allegiance Bias”
Markman, K. D., & Hirt, E. R. (2002) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.20.1.58.20943 · Cited by 53
Wann, D. L. L., & Dolan, T. J. (1994) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.547 · Cited by 55
Two of a kind: Perceptions of own and partner's attachment characteristics
Ruvolo, A. P., & FABIN, L. A. (1999) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00211.x · Cited by 54
Using Partially Structured Attitude Measures to Enhance the Attitude-Behavior Relationship
Vargas, P. T., von Hippel, W., & Petty, R. E. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203259931 · Cited by 54
“According to the logic behind this measure, different people should encode these scenarios in different ways ( Hastorf & Cantril, 1954 ).”
BackgroundIngroup Favoritism in Umpiring Decisions in Australian Football
Mohr, P. B., & Larsen, K. (1998) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224549809600403 · Cited by 53
Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.009 · Cited by 52
Zoning Out or Breaking Through? Linking Daydreaming to Creativity in the Workplace
Baer, M., Dane, E., & Madrid, H. P. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1283 · Cited by 53
Six Sigma failures: An escalation model
Chakravorty, S. S. (2009) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-009-0020-8 · Cited by 53
Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making
Simon, D., & Scurich, N. (2011) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01238.x · Cited by 56
Hostile Media and the Campaign Trail: Perceived Media Bias in the Race for Governor
Huge, M. E., & Glynn, C. J. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01473.x · Cited by 51
“This perception of relatively hostile news content (e.g., Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) leads to ideas that coverage will be perceived to be less favorable to one’s own position, relative to the coverage of the other position.”
BackgroundInfluentialClinical versus Actuarial Judgment
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.042 · Cited by 53
Social Verification Theory: A New Way to Conceptualize Validation, Dissonance, and Belonging
Hillman, J. G., Fowlie, D. I., & MacDonald, T. K. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221138384 · Cited by 63
“Biases in individuals’ subjective realities can lead to situations where two different individuals perceive the same stimuli but give divergent accounts of what was real (e.g., Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Vallone et al., 1985).”
BackgroundAllen, M. S., Robson, D. A., Martin, L. J., & Laborde, S. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219893995 · Cited by 51
“In one of the first documented observations of self-serving thought, two sets of opposing sports fans were asked to provide their thoughts on the behavior of their supported team and that of the opposition (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundCommitment: A variable in women's response to marital therapy
Beach, S. R. H., & Broderick, J. E. (1983) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926188308250143 · Cited by 50
Heuristics and Biases in Application
Fischhoff, B. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.043 · Cited by 51
Why do ineffective treatments seem helpful? A brief review
Hartman, S. E. (2009) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/1746-1340-17-10 · Cited by 50
The Cultural Patterning of Sympathy toward the Homeless and Other Victims of Misfortune
Bunis, W. K., Yancik, A., & Snow, D. A. (1996) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3096951 · Cited by 49
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.006 · Cited by 46
Ethical Decision Making: More Needed Than Good Intentions
Prentice, R. A. (2007) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v63.n6.4923 · Cited by 48
Krems, J. A., Hahnel-Peeters, R. K., Merrie, L. A., Williams, K. E. G., & Sznycer, D. (2023) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.02.008 · Cited by 52
“This hypothetical effect may partially explain, for example, partisan bias in the interpretation of events (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Ross, 1995; Vallone, Ross, & Lepper, 1985).”
BackgroundLike Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs
Gilovich, T. D., & Savitsky, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.036 · Cited by 50
The Effects of Construal Levels on Asymmetric Temptation-Goal Cognitive Associations
Fujita, K., & Sasota, J. A. (2011) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.2.125 · Cited by 46
Schuldt, J. P., & Roh, S. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.217 · Cited by 45
Kossowska, M., Czernatowicz‐Kukuczka, A., & Sekerdej, M. (2016) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12186 · Cited by 43
“This assumption is consistent with theory and research on motivated reasoning in general (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kunda, 1990; Webster & Kruglanski, 1994), and specific evidence that biased judgments occur across the political spectrum (Bartels, 2002; Crawford, 2012; Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979;…”
ResultBridge ties bind collective memories
Momennejad, I., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09452-y · Cited by 45
Self-imposed filter bubbles: Selective attention and exposure in online search
Ekström, A. G., Niehorster, D. C., & Olsson, E. J. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100226 · Cited by 45
When Do Self-Schemas Shape Social Perception?: The Role of Descriptive Ambiguity
Green, J. D., & Sedikides, C. (2001) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1010611922816 · Cited by 44
“Moving back to the empirical arena, the point that ambiguity is the norm in the social environment was made loud and clear approximately 50 years ago through the classic Hastorf and Cantril (1954) experiment and the Bruner (1951) review.”
BackgroundLieberman, M. D. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.028 · Cited by 46
“We see reckless people, not people that we have decided are reckless (Hastorf and Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundOyedeji, T. A. (2010) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764210376312 · Cited by 44
“The role of audiences’ worldview in their perception of media messages and media outlets has been studied across mass communication, political science, and social psychology literatures (Gunther, 1992; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Hinich & Munger, 1994; Lyons & Scheb, 1992).”
BackgroundArundale, R. B. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190210199.001.0001 · Cited by 47
Examining the behavioral manifestations of fan avidity in sports marketing
DeSarbo, W. S., & Madrigal, R. (2011) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465661111112511 · Cited by 44
“Studies have also considered fans use of counterfactual thinking and hindsight judgments (Roese and Maniar, 1997), and how biased processing affects their interpretation of game information (Hastorf and Cantril, 1954; Madrigal, 2008; Wann and Schrader, 2000).”
BackgroundMaking Sense of East Asian Self-Enhancement
Heine, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022103256481 · Cited by 44
“Building on the classic American studies by Hastorf and Cantril (1954) and Cialdini et al. (1976), they investigated whether Japanese would show the same kind of intergroup bias while watching their school’s football team play against a rival.”
BackgroundRemarks on Support Theory: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.029 · Cited by 45
Whites' ethnocentrism and their attributions for the behavior of blacks: A motivational bias1
Greenberg, J., & Rosenfield, D. (1979) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00214.x · Cited by 44
Political Attitudes Bias the Mental Representation of a Presidential Candidate’s Face
Young, A. I., Ratner, K. G., & Fázio, R. H. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613510717 · Cited by 41
“Attitudes have been shown to bias the construal of objects and events (e.g., Fazio & Williams, 1986; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979).”
BackgroundBauman, C. W., Trawalter, S., & Unzueta, M. M. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214543881 · Cited by 39
“…can create perceptual differences in a variety of seemingly objective judgments about aspects of situations ranging from the amount of rough play in football games (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) to the needs of survivors following natural disasters (Sommers, Apfelbaum, Dukes, Toosi, & Wang, 2006).”
BackgroundBranding in an Era of Retailer Dominance
de Chernatony, L. (1989) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.1989.11107109 · Cited by 43
Cooperation, association, and contest
Lüschen, G. (1970) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200277001400103 · Cited by 42
What is the 'Science of Science Communication'?Preprint
Kahan, D. M. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2562025 · Cited by 42
“Students from rival colleges, for example, can be expected to form opposing perceptions when viewing a film of a disputed officiating call in a football game between their schools, consistent with their stake in experiencing emotional solidarity with their peers [Hastorf and Cantril, 1954].”
BackgroundSaffarizadeh, K., University of Texas at Arlington, Keil, M., Georgia State University, Boodraj, M., Boise State University, Alashoor, T., & University of Navarra (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00839 · Cited by 41
The case for partisan motivated reasoning
Williams, D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04223-1 · Cited by 57
“…when they support their ingroup (Claassen & Ensley, 2016; Kopko, et al., 2011); they interpret events in ways favourable to their ingroup (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954 ; Kahan, et al., 2012; Stanovich & West, 2007); and they selectively learn and recall facts favourable to their ingroup (Frenda, et…”
BackgroundToward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
Simon, D., & Read, S. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231204579 · Cited by 47
“The classic study by Hastorf and Cantril (1954) demonstrated that belonging to a college community resulted in polarized distortions of a contested football game: which activities on the field amounted to rule breaking, how severe were those violations, who was to blame for the fracas, and how…”
Gergen, K. J. (2015) · The Journal of Humanistic Counseling · doi:10.1002/johc.12009 · Cited by 41
“In this light, consider the classic research in social psychology in which psychologists (Hastorf & Cantrill 1954) focused on students’ perceptions of a football game between Princeton and Dartmouth.”
BackgroundOne Field, Many Perspectives: Building the Foundations for Dialogue
Hermann, M. G. (1998) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00099 · Cited by 41
Attitude accessibility as a determinant of object construal and evaluation
Young, A. I., & Fázio, R. H. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.009 · Cited by 40
“Studies have found, for example, that needs (e.g., hunger: Radel & Clément-Guillotin, 2012; or poverty: Bruner & Goodman, 1947) and desires (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) can lead to very different construals of the exact same object or event.”
BackgroundPerceived Injustice and Sports Violence
Mark, M. M., Bryant, F. B., & Lehman, D. R. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5530-7_6 · Cited by 43
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.001.0001 · Cited by 103
Forming beliefs about adjudicated outcomes: Perceptions of risk and reservation values
Babcock, L. C., Farber, H. S., Fobian, C. S., & Shafir, E. B. (1995) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/0144-8188(95)00017-3 · Cited by 34
From “me” to “we”: The role of construal level in promoting maximized joint outcomes
Stillman, P. E., Fujita, K., Sheldon, O. J., & Trope, Y. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.004 · Cited by 40
Detrimental Citizenship Behaviour: A Multilevel Framework of Antecedents and Consequences
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/more.12015 · Cited by 40
“Moreover, as combined instrumental and psychological interests increase, so will the tendency to subjectively interpret situations in biased ways that favor themselves and their organizations and to adopt consensual thinking (i.e., norms) regarding behaviours (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundMass Media and the Spiral of Silence: The Philippines from Marcos to Aquino
González, H. (1988) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1988.tb02068.x · Cited by 38
Who Decides What Is Acceptable Speech on Campus? Why Restricting Free Speech Is Not the Answer
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618767324 · Cited by 38
“Research with adults has revealed that they •• exhibit selective perception, in which witnesses perceive the same event differently (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954); •• rate the quality of in-group members’ arguments more positively and adopt more extreme positions (E.-J. Lee, 2007); •• overestimate the…”
BackgroundInfluentialMeijers, M. H. C., Noordewier, M. K., Verlegh, P. W. J., Zebregs, S., & Smit, E. G. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518773148 · Cited by 37
“This absence of vicarious cleansing seems to be in line with the body of research documenting people’s tendency to be self-serving (Finch & Cialdini, 1989; Gino & Galinsky, 2012; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kunda, 1987; Sanitioso, Kunda, & Fong, 1990).”
ResultSpeaking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths
Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614566858 · Cited by 40
“…ideology, motivated reasoning, between-subjects design, within-subjects design People often see what they want to see (Dunning & Balcetis, 2013; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) and judge belief-congruent information more favorably than belief-incongruent information (Ditto & Lopez, 1992; Taber &…”
BackgroundUnderstanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic
Fujita, K., Carnevale, J. J., & Trope, Y. (2016) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2 · Cited by 37
“For example, a football fan may perceive his team’s play as a “hard hit” while a fan of the opposing team may construe the same maneuver as a “dirty play” [49].”
Backgroundvan Baar, J. M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2022) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000814 · Cited by 38
“Imagine if we reran the Dartmouth-Princeton football experiment (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) to test which psychological processing step was most crucial in driving the supporters’ biased judgments of the violence on the field.”
BackgroundMethodThe Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T. D., Vallone, R. P., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.035 · Cited by 39
Fandom Biases Retrospective Judgments Not Perception
Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Maurer, A. E., Meitz, T. G. K., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep43083 · Cited by 36
Fisher, G., & Neubert, E. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221093291 · Cited by 43
“This is commonly referred to as motivated reasoning,which is an unconscious tendency to seek out and then process information in a manner that suits an end goal extrinsic to the formation of accurate beliefs (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundEglit, G. M. L., Stenclik, J. H., Miele, A. S., Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2015) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2014.938809 · Cited by 36
Reflections on Communication and Sport
Wanta, W. (2013) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/2167479512471334 · Cited by 35
“Further, the source of the sports story also mattered—whether the sports story was in the newspaper of the hometown of a university, in the newspaper of the city of the cross-state rival’s university, or in a newspaper in a neutral site. by Hastrof and Cantril (1954).”
BackgroundSpontaneous Goal Inference (SGI)
Moskowitz, G. B., & Ökten, I. O. (2016) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12232 · Cited by 38
The Impact of Culture and Identity on Emotional Reactions to Insults
Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., Pauketat, J. V. T., & Smith, E. R. (2017) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117701194 · Cited by 35
“…& Smith, 2015; Mackie, Smith, & Ray, 2008; Smith, 1993) argues that when a specific group membership is made salient, individuals perceive events through a group lens, assessing the goals, motives, and resources the group has in relation to a given social context (e.g., Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundIllusory correlations in graphological inference.
King, R. N., & Koehler, D. J. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037//1076-898x.6.4.336 · Cited by 35
Curran, J., & Sparks, C. (1991) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/016344391013002006 · Cited by 33
Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory
Fisher, R. P. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00042229 · Cited by 33
A Negativity Bias in Reframing Shapes Political Preferences Even in Partisan Contexts
Boydstun, A. E., Ledgerwood, A., & Sparks, J. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617733520 · Cited by 31
“…instance, considerable research suggests that the motivation to see one’s own group (vs. an out-group) in a more favorable light can bias information processing (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Ledgerwood, Callahan, & Chaiken, 2014; Tajfel & Turner, 1986; Westen, Blagov, Harenski, Kilts, & Hamann, 2006).”
BackgroundSudden Shifts in Social Identity Swiftly Shape Implicit Evaluation
Xiao, Y. J., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.005 · Cited by 32
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Perspective Taking in Groups
Caruso, E. M., Nicholas Epley, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(06)08010-8 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1954-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254129346
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Physical education and sports games research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review