The DOI matches its Crossref record.
They saw a game: A case study
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Princeton students saw the Dartmouth team commit twice as many flagrant penalties and three times as many mild penalties as their own team.Dartmouth students, on the other hand, recorded an approximately equal number of penalties by both teams.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)
In the citing paper
“The self-serving bias affects not only individuals' evaluations of themselves, but also of groups they are affiliated with.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hastorf and Cantril (1954)
In the citing paper
“Participants who did not receive a self-aYrmation judged the activist who shared their convictions more favorably than the activist who did not (see also Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Hastorf & Cantril, 1954
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
“…3/17/11; Revision accepted 5/23/11 of ambiguous information and remarkably adept at reaching justifiable conclusions that mesh with their desires (Babcock & Loewenstein, 1997; Dawson, Gilovich, & Regan, 2002; Gilovich, 1983; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kunda, 1990; Zuckerman, 1979).”
BackgroundPolitical conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
(2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098 · Cited by 2,293
Conway, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 · Cited by 2,155
Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework
Fazio, R. H. (1990) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60318-4 · Cited by 2,002
The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38004-5 · Cited by 1,614
“Participants who did not receive a self‐aYrmation judged the activist who shared their convictions more favorably than the activist who did not (see also Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundFeeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015701 · Cited by 1,292
“Therefore, to obtain a clearer picture of congeniality biases, future research should explore the size and variability of the bias at information interpretation (Bargh, 1999; Bruner, 1957; Darley & Gross, 1983; Duncan, 1976; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979).”
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
“…make use of this form of information-processing to protect their stake in all manner of groups—including ones not connected to politics (Sherman & Cohen, 2006; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954)—there is no reason to expect it to be more pronounced among people who subscribe to any particular ideology.”
BackgroundThe Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
“Perceptions of what occurs on the field are heavily influenced by what the fan would like to happen (e.g., Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundA Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct
Rohan, M. J. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0403_4 · Cited by 1,129
“For example, perhaps the Dartmouth and Princeton football fans’ football club social value priorities were highly salient and therefore influenced their perceptions of the football game made famous by Hastorf and Cantril (1954).”
BackgroundExplaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109 · Cited by 1,071
Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009 · Cited by 931
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF THE SPORT FAN MOTIVATION SCALE
Wann, D. L. L. (1995) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/019372395019004004 · Cited by 804
On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses.
Fujita, K. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311411165 · Cited by 734
“…and behaviors do not necessarily reflect the objective features of their social worlds but rather their subjective interpretations or construals (e.g., Balcetis & Dunning, 2006; Bruner, 1957; Griffin & Ross, 1991; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kunda, 1990; Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, & Epstein, 2003).”
BackgroundContracts as Reference Points *
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (2008) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.1 · Cited by 711
Dunning, D. A., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.020 · Cited by 689
Die-Hard and Fair-Weather Fans: Effects of Identification on BIRGing and CORFing Tendencies
Wann, D. L. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/019372359001400203 · Cited by 659
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111 · Cited by 725
Sensory–perceptual episodic memory and its context: autobiographical memory
Conway, M. A. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0940 · Cited by 640
“Memories are encoded in terms of the self (cf. Hastorf & Cantril 1952 for an early, and still one of the best, studies of this) and experiences with strong self reference may receive privileged encoding that render them highly accessible and capable of evoking intense experiences of recollection,…”
BackgroundCheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049 · Cited by 646
Fixing the communications failure
Kahan, D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/463296a · Cited by 602
Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation1
Keil, M. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249627 · Cited by 594
“Psychological literature on selective perception (e.g., Allen and Marquis, 1964; Hastorf and Cantril, 1954; Hogarth, 1979) provides additional support for this notion.”
BackgroundWhen beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611011 · Cited by 584
Sonenshein, S. B. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585677 · Cited by 596
“ences in perception, Hastorf and Cantril (1954) asked Dartmouth and Princeton students to as”
BackgroundDitto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535
“…reasoning, particularly in the form of self-and group-enhancing biases, and these biases have been found in a multitude of different populations and contexts (Alicke, 1985; Billig & Tajfel, 1973; Darley & Gross, 1983; Ditto, 2009; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kunda, 1990; Mercier & Sperber, 2011).”
BackgroundOn the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects
Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fázio, R. H. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4 · Cited by 543
Media bias in presidential elections: a meta-analysis
D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x · Cited by 510
“It might be a matter of selective perception (Bauer, 1964), an example of two people observing the same message or event, but interpreting it differently (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective
Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613504114 · Cited by 520
Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members
Robert, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y.-T. C. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260210 · Cited by 514
“…of their team member’s behavior. the assessment and interpretation of the meaning of a behavior may vary across individuals; selective perception is a bias in information processing that often leaves individuals who view the same events with different interpretations of those events [55, 68].”
BackgroundMISPERCEPTIONS ABOUT PERCEPTUAL BIAS
Gerber, A. S., & GREEN, D. P. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.189 · Cited by 507
Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict
Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5 · Cited by 463
“It is well known that prior beliefs and knowledge influence the way that information is processed and encoded (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Cohen, 1981; Ross & Lepper, 1980).”
BackgroundKinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463195007003003 · Cited by 477
Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.008 · Cited by 424
Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60333-0 · Cited by 404
Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest
Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610332.006 · Cited by 401
Sloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 412
Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution
Ross, L. D., & Ward, A. C. (1995) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60407-4 · Cited by 385
Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. (2006) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x · Cited by 417
“And althoughHastorf and Cantrill (1954) demonstrated the effects of personal prejudice on perception in the 1950s, there was little discussion of the relevance of this to the legal”
How we see ourselves and how we see others
Pronin, E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154199 · Cited by 353
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6 · Cited by 345
“Unfortunately, divergent construal means that in many instances of conflict, both sides will view their ingroup as the victim, and the outgroup as the perpetrator (for the classic example of divergent construal, see Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundIdeology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study
Kahan, D. M. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2182588 · Cited by 331
The Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations
Cikara, M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614527464 · Cited by 378
“…study found that students from two different universities had very different perceptions of the same football game, recalling different “facts” about the game (e.g., irrespective of team allegiance, fans recalled with great certainty that the other team had played dirty; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
Same Story, Different Story: The Neural Representation of Interpretive Frameworks
Yeshurun, Y., Swanson, S., Simony, E., Chen, J., Lazaridi, C., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616682029 · Cited by 300
“For example, when Dartmouth and Princeton football fans watched the same game, each group of fans thought the other team was playing in an aggressive and unfair way, to such an extent that it seemed like they saw two very different games (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundInfra‐humanization: The Wall of Group Differences
Leyens, J., Demoulin, S., Vaes, J., Gaunt, R. A., & Paladino, M. P. (2007) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00006.x · Cited by 329
“Complementing those obtained by Hastorf and Cantril (1954) and Vallone et al.”
MethodSelf-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest
Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027409.88372.b4 · Cited by 322
“From books that trumpet the benefits of personal fulfillment (Robbins, 1986) to songs that see loving oneself as “the greatest love of all” (Houston, 2000), self-interest is no longer lumped together with greed as a deadly sin, but is now seen as one of the highest callings of human existence.”
BackgroundLeadership Behaviors in Sport: A Theoretical Model and Research Paradigm1
Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01462.x · Cited by 326
Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.002 · Cited by 312
Archie Bunker's Bigotry: A Study in Selective Perception and Exposure
Vidmar, N. J., & Rokeach, M. (1974) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00353.x · Cited by 304
Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage
Perloff, R. M. (1989) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365089016002004 · Cited by 307
Raudenbush, S. W. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.85 · Cited by 302
Zavyalova, A. A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. D. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0611 · Cited by 297
“For example, Hastorf and Cantril’s classic study of an American collegiate football game showed that students favored their alma mater versus the opponent when tracking penalties (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundNorm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.022 · Cited by 285
An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences.
Wondra, J. D., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039252 · Cited by 275
“Observers in this scenario might ignore their own team’s fault in the injury more than the injured player and differ in their agency appraisals (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) or they may simply feel happy about the 49 injury because of its goal-congruence (Ellsworth & Scherer, 2003).”
BackgroundWhy They Don’t Trust the Media: An Examination of Factors Predicting Trust
Lee, T.-T. (2010) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764210376308 · Cited by 243
“…controversial type of research, or a labor strike—that tend to believe the media unfairly favor their opponents (Christen, Kannaovakun, & Gunther, 1998; Giner-Sorolla & Chaiken, 1994; Gunther, Christen, Liebhart, & Chia, 2001; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Perloff, 1989; Vallone, Ross, & Lepper, 1985).”
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415 · Cited by 239
Group Identification and Historical Memory
Sahdra, B. K., & Ross, M. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206296103 · Cited by 241
“…favorably than groups to which they do elong, both when the basis of group categorization is ingful and when it is arbitrary or trivial (Brewer, ; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Hewstone, Rubin, & PSPB, Vol. 33 No. 3, March 2007 384-395 DOI: 10.1177/0146167206296103 © 2007 by the Society for…”
BackgroundInfluentialCompatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.014 · Cited by 235
Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614553947 · Cited by 234
“This tendency for people to perceive those who disagree with them as biased while neglecting their own biased perceptions has been documented in many influential studies (e.g., Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979; Vallone, Ross, & Lepper, 1985).”
ResultBiased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively
Houston, D. A., & Fázio, R. H. (1989) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.51 · Cited by 226
Hill, B., & Green, B. C. (2000) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1441-3523(00)70083-0 · Cited by 232
Affirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.
Sherman, D. K., Cohen, G. L., Nelson, L. D., Nussbaum, A. D., Bunyan, D. P., & Garcia, J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015451 · Cited by 223
Sports performance judgments from a social cognitive perspective
Plessner, H., & Haar, T. (2006) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.007 · Cited by 220
A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect
Perloff, R. M. (2015) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234 · Cited by 235
“A review of the classic work on ego-involvement (Hovland, Harvey, & Sherif, 1957; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Lord et al., 1979) shows how inextricably connected attitude extremity, personal importance of the issue, and self-relevant attributes are and how difficult they can be to entangle, though…”
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 215
Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News
Groeling, T. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-040811-115123 · Cited by 232
Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication
Friedman, R., & Currall, S. C. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267035611003 · Cited by 220
“…has occurred, it can easily become ‘locked in’ owing to biases in perception that make people see only evidence that reinforces their view of the other (e.g. Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) and attribute perceived bad actions to dispositional rather than situational causes (e.g. Hayden & Mischel, 1976).”
BackgroundA cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map
Connors, M. H., & Halligan, P. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01588 · Cited by 237
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00042114 · Cited by 206
“Individuals may experience the same event quite differently (Hastorf & Cantril 1954), Consequently, it is not clear what the test of correspondence should be.”
BackgroundMotivated Bayesians: Feeling Moral While Acting Egoistically
Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Weber, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.189 · Cited by 208
When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.021 · Cited by 211
Transcending Temptation Through Abstraction
Fujita, K., & Carnevale, J. J. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412449169 · Cited by 211
“A “hard hit” in the eyes of one sports fan might be construed as a “dirty play” by another (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundRestaurant tipping: an examination of three ‘rational’ explanations
Lynn, M., & Grassman, A. (1990) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(90)90002-q · Cited by 210
“Crusco and Wetzel (1984) and Lynn and Latane (1984) did examine the relationship between tipping and customers’ own evaluations of their service, but Crusco and Wetzel confounded customer ratings of the service, the dining experience and the atmosphere by averaging these ratings into a single index.”
BackgroundDunning, D. A., & Balcetis, E. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412463693 · Cited by 199
“Hastorf and Cantril (1954) played students footage of this game 1 week later and simply asked which team had started the rough play.”
BackgroundSynchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives
Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hyönä, J., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.022 · Cited by 180
“…b Advanced Magnetic Imaging Centre, Aalto NeuroImaging, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland c Department of Psychology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland d Brain Research Unit, O.V. Lounasmaa Laboratory, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076 Espoo,…”
BackgroundInfluentialMcNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.729 · Cited by 201
“Perceptual confirmation occurs when prior expectations for an event lead people to interpret the details of the event in ways that give rise to expectancy-consistent evaluations of the event (Darley & Gross, 1983; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Kelley, 1950; Miller & Turnbull, 1986).”
BackgroundPassarelli, F., & Tabellini, G. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/691700 · Cited by 185
Biased Assimilation of Sociopolitical Arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential Debate
Munro, G. D., Ditto, P. H., Lockhart, L. K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., & Peterson, E. (2002) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2401_2 · Cited by 191
Social Identity and Economic Policy
Shayo, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082019-110313 · Cited by 180
Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.013 · Cited by 195
Who's the Fairest of them All? An Empirical Test for Partisan Bias on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News
Groeling, T. J. (2008) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02668.x · Cited by 188
The Liberal Media Myth Revisited: An Examination of Factors Influencing Perceptions of Media Bias
Lee, T. (2005) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4 · Cited by 187
“…a single issue—such as Middle East conflicts, primate research, or a UPS strike—tend to believe the media unfairly favor the other side (Christen, Kannaovakun, & Gunther, 1998; Giner-Sorolla & Chaiken, 1994; Gunther et al., 2001; Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Perloff, 1989; Vallone et al., 1985).”
BackgroundAttributions of Highly Identified Sports Spectators
Wann, D. L. L., & Dolan, T. J. (1994) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1994.9923013 · Cited by 184
Rationalizing Democracy: The Perceptual Bias and (Un)Democratic Behavior
Krishnarajan, S. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000806 · Cited by 192
“…selective perception (Ceci and Williams 2018; Kahan 2016), altering their perceptions of a given event in ways that fit better with their initial beliefs and motivations (see also Anduiza, Gallego, and Muñoz 2013; Hastorf and Cantril 1954; Kahan et al. 2012; Kunda 1990; Walter and Redlawsk 2019).”
BackgroundDefending the Status Quo: Power and Bias in Social Conflict
Keltner, D. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672972310007 · Cited by 177
Bar‐Tal, D., & Antebi, D. (1992) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(92)90052-v · Cited by 177
TARGET ARTICLE: The Nonobvious Social Psychology of Happiness
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2005) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1604_04 · Cited by 191
“The “They Saw a Game” study by Hastorf and Cantril (1954)—which showed how Dartmouth and Princeton fans recalled two very different football games, although they viewed the same game—is a wonderful example in this area.”
Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs about Others' Altruism
Tella, R. D., Truglia, R. N. P., Babino, A., & Sigman, M. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141409 · Cited by 173
“4 See Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler (1986); Hoffman et al. (1994); and Bolton, Katok, and Zwick (1998). A vast literature studies different aspects of these preferences, including Rabin (1993); Fehr and Schmidt (1999); Bolton and Ockenfels (2000); Heinrich et al. (2001); and Malmendier, te Velde, and Weber (2014); int…”
InfluentialKay, A. C., & Ross, L. D. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00057-x · Cited by 166
Vandello, J. A., Goldschmied, N. P., & Richards, D. A. R. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207307488 · Cited by 169
Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.026 · Cited by 178
Attitude Accessibility and Motivation as Determinants of Biased Processing: A Test of the MODE Model
Schuette, R. A., & Fázio, R. H. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295217005 · Cited by 160
Inside the Planning Fallacy: The Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Time Predictions
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.016 · Cited by 169
A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization
Dimara, E., Franconeri, S., Catherine Plaisant, B., Bezerianos, A., & Dragicevic, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2872577 · Cited by 192
The neuroscience of in-group bias
Molenberghs, P. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002 · Cited by 174
A Social Identity Approach to Person Memory
Bavel, J. J. V., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212455829 · Cited by 155
“The current experiments suggest that people process the social (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954) and physical (Xiao & Van Bavel, 2012) world in a manner consistent with their social identity.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1954-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254129346
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Physical education and sports games research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
