Cited by 97Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Chronic cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys: impact on associative learning, cognitive control, and working memory

Open access
Porter, Jessica N., Olsen, Adam S., Gurnsey, Kate, Dugan, Brian P., Jedema, Hank P., Bradberry, Charles W.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Cocaine users display a wide range of cognitive impairments. Because treatment outcome is dependent on baseline cognitive ability, it is clinically important to understand the underlying neurobiology of these deficits. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether cocaine exposure by itself is an etiological factor and, if so, to determine the overall nature of cognitive deficits associated with cocaine use. This will help to guide therapeutic approaches that address cognitive components of cocaine use to improve treatment outcome. We used rhesus monkeys in a longitudinal study in which 14 animals were characterized before assignment to matched control (n = 6) and cocaine self-administration (n = 8) groups. Self-administration took place on 4 consecutive days/week over 9 months, with a maximum (and typical) daily cumulative intake of 3.0 mg/kg. Weekly cognitive assessments (total of 36) were conducted after a 72 h drug-free period. We used a stimulus discrimination task with reversal to evaluate associative learning and the cognitive control/flexibility needed to adapt to changes in reward contingencies. After extended self-administration, initial accuracy on the stimulus discrimination indicated intact associative learning. However, animals were impaired at maintaining high levels of accuracy needed to reach criterion and initiate the reversal. Increasing the reward contrast between stimuli permitted evaluation of reversal performance and revealed striking deficits in the cocaine group. Impairments in visual working memory were also observed using a delayed match-to-sample task. These results suggest a combination of generalized, possibly attentional, impairments, along with a more specific cognitive control impairment implicating orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5426-10.2011

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive deficits have been described in animals chronically exposed to drugs of abuse, indicating these impairments may be due to chronic drug use.

    “Similarly to humans, cognitive deficits have been described in animals chronically exposed to drugs of abuse (Crean et al., 2011; Porter et al., 2011) indicating that these impairments may be due to chronic drug use.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, J. N., Olsen, A. S., Gurnsey, K., Dugan, B. P., Jedema, H. P., & Bradberry, C. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Bradberry, Charles W.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-03-30
Volume
31
Issue
13
Pages
4926-4934
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1987621639
Cited by
97
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 25636, DA 10331, R01DA010331, R01DA025636)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
cocaine self-administration, cognitive impairment, associative learning, cognitive control, working memory, rhesus monkeys, stimulus discrimination, reversal learning, reward contingency, orbitofrontal cortex, attentional impairment, longitudinal cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Cocaine, Cognition, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Random Allocation, Self Administration, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review