Cited by 260Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Spatial exploration induces a persistent reversal of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus

Xu, Lin, Anwyl, Roger, Rowan, Michael J.·1998·Nature

Abstract

Experience-dependent long-lasting increases in excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus are believed to underlie certain types of memory. Whereas stimulation of hippocampal pathways in freely moving rats can readily elicit a long-term potentiation (LTP) of transmission that may last for weeks, previous studies have failed to detect persistent increases in synaptic efficacy after hippocampus-mediated learning. As changes in synaptic efficacy are contingent on the history of plasticity at the synapses, we have examined the effect of experience-dependent hippocampal activation on transmission after the induction of LTP. We show that exploration of a new, non-stressful environment rapidly induces a complete and persistent reversal of the expression of high-frequency stimulation-induced early-phase LTP in the CA1 area of the hippocampus, without affecting baseline transmission in a control pathway. LTP expression is not affected by exploration of familiar environments. We found that spatial exploration affected LTP within a defined time window because neither the induction of LTP nor the maintenance of long-established LTP was blocked. The discovery of a novelty-induced reversal of LTP expression provides strong evidence that extensive long-lasting decreases in synaptic efficacy may act in tandem with enhancements at selected synapses to allow the detection and storage of new information by the hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/29783

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, L., Anwyl, R., & Rowan, M. J.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-08
Volume
394
Issue
6696
Pages
891-894
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1519786933
Cited by
260
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, hippocampus, CA1, spatial exploration, novelty, synaptic plasticity, synaptic efficacy, memory, hippocampus-dependent learning, excitatory synaptic transmission
MeSH terms
Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review