The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 82 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Open accessAbstract
Computers are physical systems: the laws of physics dictate what they can and cannot do. In particular, the speed with which a physical device can process information is limited by its energy and the amount of information that it can process is limited by the number of degrees of freedom it possesses. Here I explore the physical limits of computation as determined by the speed of light c, the quantum scale ℏ and the gravitational constant G. As an example, I put quantitative bounds to the computational power of an ‘ultimate laptop’ with a mass of one kilogram confined to a volume of one litre.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Lloyd derives physical limits on computation from the speed of light, quantum scale, and gravitational constant, using a 1-kg, 1-L “ultimate laptop” as an example. Energy limits speed to \(2E/\pi\hbar\) operations per second, while entropy limits memory, yielding \(5.4258\times10^{50}\) operations per second and about \(10^{31}\) bits in the thermal/black-body estimate.
Key findings
- The ultimate laptop has mass 1 kg, volume 1 L, and energy \(E=mc^2=8.9874\times10^{16}\) J; it can perform a maximum of \(5.4258\times10^{50}\) logical operations per second and, using all memory, about \(10^{19}\) operations per bit per second.
- Speed is energy-limited: an elementary logical operation in time \(\Delta t\) requires \(E \ge \pi\hbar/2\Delta t\), so a system with average energy \(E\) can perform at most \(2E/\pi\hbar\) operations per second; this total is independent of parallel versus serial architecture.
- Memory is entropy-limited: information is \(I=S(E)/k_B\ln 2\). A black-body estimate for 1 kg in 1 L gives \(T=5.87\times10^8\) K, \(S=2.04\times10^8\) J/K, and \(I=2.13\times10^{31}\) bits; a 1-kg black-hole limit gives \(3.827\times10^{16}\) bits and the same \(5.4258\times10^{50}\) operations per second, but fully serial computation.
- Error correction imposes a thermal load: black-body radiation allows \(B=7.195\times10^{42}\) bits per m² per second; with surface area \(10^{-2}\) m² and about \(10^{50}\) operations per second, the error rate must be less than \(10^{-10}\) per operation, with energy throughput \(4.04\times10^{26}\) W, suggesting operation below the maximum speed.
Methods
- Theoretical derivations from \(c\), \(\hbar\), \(G\), and \(k_B\), using the quantum speed limit from time-energy uncertainty and the Margolus-Levitin result; universal logic is discussed via Toffoli/Controlled-Controlled-NOT operations.
- For memory, the 1-kg, 1-L system is modeled as a collection of elementary-particle modes in the canonical ensemble at fixed average energy; maximum entropy is estimated, with a lower bound from black-body photons and a black-hole entropy calculation for the compressed limit.
- Comparisons are made to existing quantum computers (NMR, optical-atomic, ion-trap) and to parallel/serial trade-offs via communication time versus bit-flip time.
Limitations
- The paper states that there is no guarantee these limits will ever be attained; black-hole computation is likely extremely difficult or impossible to realize, complete control over all degrees of freedom is difficult, packaging issues make the memory limit unlikely, and exact Planck-scale behavior requires a theory of quantum gravity.
- The paper states that error-correction thermal loads suggest operating slower than the maximum, and that Avogadro-scale memory would face severe input/output problems (e.g., \(10^{23}\) bits at \(10^{12}\) bits/s would take about 10,000 years for a serial read/write).
- Evident from the text: the numerical estimates depend on simplifying assumptions, including zero angular momentum and electric charge, a black-body lower bound, species-count estimates, and applying the canonical ensemble to a closed system with acknowledged subtlety.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 82 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combining this formula with the formula 2 E/π ¯ h for the number of logical operations that can be performed per second, we see that when it is using all its memory, the number of operations per bit per second that our ultimate laptop can perform is k B 2 ln 2 E/π ¯ hS ∝ k B T/ ¯ h , where T = ( ∂S/∂E ) -1 is the temperature of a kilogram of matter in a maximum entropy in a liter volume.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, the ultimate laptop can perform a maximimum of 5 . 4258 × 10 50 operations per second.”
- Also stated in: § 1.3 Ultimate limits to speed of computation · p. 5 · plain
“Applying this result to a one kilogram computer with energy E = mc 2 = 8 . 9874 × 10 16 joules show that our ultimate laptop can perform a maximum of 5 . 4258 × 10 50 operations per second.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1.3 Ultimate limits to speed of computation · p. 5 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that in this parallel case, the overall spread in energy of the computer as a whole is considerably smaller than the average energy: in general ∆ E = √∑ ℓ ∆ E 2 ℓ ≈ √ N ∆ E ℓ while E = ∑ E ℓ ≈ NE ℓ .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integrating the relationship T = ( ∂S/∂E ) -1 over E yields T = CE/S , where C is a constant of order unity (e.g., C = 4 / 3 for black-body radiation, C = 3 / 2 for an ideal gas, and C = 1 / 2 for a black hole).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A one kilogram computer has average energy E = mc 2 = 8 . 9874 × 10 16 joules.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, applying the potential effects a NOT operation in a time that attains the limit given by quantum mechanics.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conventional laptops operate much more slowly than the ultimate laptop.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, a conventional computer employs many degrees of freedom (billions and billions of electrons) for registering a single bit.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a computer that has been compressed to its Schwarzschild radius, the energy per bit is E/I = mc 2 /I = ln2¯ hc 3 / 4 πmG = ln2 k B T/ 2, where T = ( ∂S/∂E ) -1 = ¯ hc/ 4 πk B R S is the temperature of the Hawking radiation emitted by the hole.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At an input/output rate of 10 12 bits per second, an Avogadro-scale computer with 10 23 bits would take about 10 , 000 years to perform a serial read/write operation on the entire memory.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is not the case: if one spreads the energy E amongst N logic gates, each one operates at a rate 2 E/π ¯ hN . The total number of operations per second, N 2 E/π ¯ hN = 2 E/π ¯ h , remains the same.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, most of the energy is locked up in the mass of the particles of which the computer is constructed, leaving only an infinitesimal fraction for performing logic.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the energy is allocated to fewer logic gates (more serial operation), the rate 1 / ∆ t ℓ at which they operate and the spread in energy per gate ∆ E ℓ go up. If the energy is allocated to more logic gates (more parallel operation) then the rate at which they operate and the spread in energy per gate go down.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, r = 2, and for a one kilogram computer confined to a volume of a liter we have k B T = 8 . 10 × 10 -15 joules, or T = 5 . 87 × 10 8 K.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Energy and entropy are dominated by black body radiation consisting of photons.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A kilogram of ordinary matter holds on the order of 10 25 nuclei.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For O (10 1 -10 2 ) such species, C is on the order of 10 -3 -10 -2 , leading to a lifetime for a 1 kilogram black hole of ≈ 10 -19 seconds, during which time the hole can perform ≈ 10 32 operations on its ≈ 10 16 bits.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, in addition, one uses the natural electromagnetic interactions between nuclei and electrons in the matter to perform logical operations, one is limited to a rate of approximately 10 15 operations per bit per second, yielding an overall information processing rate of ≈ 10 40 operations per second in ordinary matter.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The entropy is S = 2 . 04 × 10 8 joule/K, which corresponds to an amount of available memory space I = S/k B ln 2 = 2 . 13 × 10 31 bits.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Energy and entropy are dominated by black body radiation consisting of photons.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All current designs for quantum computers operate at low energy levels and temperatures, exactly so that precise control can be exerted on their parts.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time it takes a bit to flip from a state | ↑〉 to an orthogonal state | ↓〉 is given by π ¯ h/ 2 µB = π ¯ h/ 2 E , where µ is the spin's magnetic moment, B is the magnetic field, and E = µB is the average energy of interaction between the spin and the magnetic field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if it achieves such an error rate, it must have an energy throughput (free energy in and thermal energy out) of 4 . 04 × 10 26 watts turning over its own rest mass energy of mc 2 ≈ 10 17 joules in a nanosecond!”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the ultimate laptop, with 2 R = 10 -1 meters, 2 E/π ¯ h ≈ 10 51 operations per second, and S/k B ln 2 ≈ 10 31 bits, t com /tfl ip ≈ 10 10 .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A computer compressed to the size of a black hole can perform 5 . 4258 × 10 50 operations per second, the same as the 1 liter computer.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, the maximum error rate that the ultimate computer can tolerate is ǫ ≤ π ln 2¯ hcS/ 2 ER = 2 tfl ip /t com . That is, the maximum error rate that can be tolerated by the ultimate computer is the inverse of its degree of parallelization.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amount of information that can be stored by the ultimate laptop, ≈ 10 31 bits, is much higher than the ≈ 10 10 bits stored on current laptops.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the Planck scale, gravitational effects and quantum effects are both important: the Compton wavelength of a particle of mass m , λ C = 2 π ¯ h/mc is on the order of its Schwarzschild radius, 2 Gm/c 2 .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amount of time it takes to send a message from one side of a computer of radius R to the other is t com = 2 R/c .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The maximum entropy can be estimated to be approximately to be 4 per relativistic pion (to within a factor of less than 2 associated with the overall production rate per mesons) of which there are approximately 10 4 per central collision in which only a few tens of nucleons are spectators. Accordingly, the total amount of memory space available is S/k B ln 2 ≈ 10 4 -10 5 bits.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ultimate laptop performs 2 mc 2 /π ¯ h = 5 . 4258 × 10 50 logical operations per second on ≈ 10 31 bits.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the ultimate laptop, each bit can flip ≈ 10 19 times per second, while the time to communicate from one side of the one liter computer to the other is on the order of 10 9 seconds: the ultimate laptop is highly parallel.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Before presenting methods for calculating these limits, it is important to note that there is no guarantee that these limits will ever be attained, no matter how ingenious computer designers become.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Computers are physical systems: what they can and cannot do is dictated by the laws of physics 1 -86 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 1 -86
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A collection of m two-state systems has 2 m accessible states and can register m bits of information.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The difference between the entropy as calculated using the canonical ensemble and that calculated using the microcanonical ensemble is minimal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Redundancy is required for error correction, however, as will be discussed below.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The precise, correct statement of the role of entropy in computation was due to Landauer 5 , who showed that reversible, i.e. one-to-one, logical operations such as NOT can be performed without dissipation in principle, but that irreversible, many-to-one operations such as AND or ERASE require dissipation at least k B ln 2 for each bit of information lost.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Landauer, R. Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183–191 (1961). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the information goes into observable degrees of freedom of the computer, such as another bit, then it has not been erased but merely moved; but if it goes into unobservable degrees of freedom such as the microscopic motion of molecules it results in an increase of entropy of at least k B ln 2.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Electronic circuits based on reversible logic have been built and exhibit considerable reductions in dissipation over conventional reversible circuits 33 -35 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Seitz, C. L. et al. in Proceedings of the 1985 Chapel Hill Conference on VLSI (ed. Fuchs, H.) (Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1985).
- Not checked yetcites [34] Merkle, R. C. Reversible electronic logic using switches. Nanotechnology 34, 21–40 (1993). source
- Not checked yetcites [35] Younis, S. G. & Knight, T. F. in Proceedings of the 1993 Symposium on Integrated Systems, Seattle, Washington (eds Berrielo, G. & Ebeling, C.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Computers in which energy is relatively evenly distributed over a larger volume are better suited for performing parallel computations. More compact computers and computers with an uneven”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Existing quantum logic gates in optical-atomic and NMR quantum computers actually attain this limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Parallelization can help perform certain computations more efficiently, but it does not alter the total number of operations per second.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The entropy governs the amount of information the system can register and the temperature governs the number of operations per bit per second it can perform.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, a computer can perform no more than”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The laws of physics do not require redundancy to perform logical operations: recently constructed quantum microcomputers use one quantum degree of freedom for each bit and operate at the Heisenberg limit ∆ t = π ¯ h/ 2∆ E for the time needed to flip a bit 64 -65 , 76 -80 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Turchette, Q. A., Hood, C. J., Lange, W., Mabuchi, H. & Kimble, H. J. Measurement of conditional phase-shifts for quantum logic. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710– 4713 (1995). source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Monroe, C., Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E., Itano, W. M. & Wineland, D. J. Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714–4717 (1995). source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F. & Havel, T. F. in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Computation—PhysComp96 (eds Toffoli, T., Biafore, M. & Leão, J.) 87–91 (New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, MA, 1996).
- Not checked yetcites [77] Gershenfeld, N. A. & Chuang, I. L. Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science 275, 350– 356 (1997). source
- Not checked yetcites [78] Chuang, I. L., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Zhou, X., Leung, D. W. & Lloyd, S. Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm. Nature 393, 143– 146 (1998). source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Jones, J. A., Mosca, M. & Hansen, R. H. Implementation of a quantum search algorithm on a quantum computer. Nature 393, 344– 346 (1998). source
- Not checked yetcites [80] Chuang, I. L., Gershenfeld, N. & Kubinec, M. Experimental implementation of fast quantum searching . Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3408– 3411 (1998). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Information is stored on nuclear spins, with one spin registering one bit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, the well-known statement that 'a black hole has no hair'-i.e., from a distance all black holes with the same charge and angular momentum look essentially alike - is now known to be not always true 91 -93 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Fiola, T. M., Preskill, J. & Strominger A. Black-hole thermodynamics and information loss in 2 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 50, 3987– 4014 (1994). source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Susskind, L. & Uglum, J. Black-hole entropy in canonical quantum-gravity and superstring theory. Phys. Rev. D 50, 2700–2711 (1994). source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Strominger A. & Vafa, C. Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Phys. Lett. B 37, 99– 104 (1996). source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the energy density in the computer goes up, different regimes in high energy physics are necessarily explored in the course of the computation. First the weak unification scale is reached, then the grand unification scale. Finally, as the linear size of the computer approaches its Schwarzchild radius, the Planck scale is reached.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although NMR quantum computers already operate at the limits to computation set by physics, they are nonetheless much slower and process much less information than the ultimate laptop described above.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is because conventional laptops use many degrees of freedom to store a bit where the ultimate laptop uses just one.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is because their energy is largely locked up in mass, thereby limiting both their speed and their memory.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the number of operations per second 2 E/π ¯ h is independent of the number of bits available, the number of operations per bit per second can be increased by using a smaller number of bits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As ordinary matter obeys the Beckenstein bound 20 -22 , k B RE/ ¯ hcS > 1 / 2 π , however, as one compresses the computer t com /tfl ip ≈ k B RE/ ¯ hcS will remain greater than one: i.e., the operation will still be somewhat parallel.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Bekenstein, J. D. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ration for bounded systems . Phys. Rev. D 23, 287– 298 (1981). source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Bekenstein, J. D. Energy cost of information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 623–626 (1981). source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Bekenstein, J. D. Entropy content and information flow in systems with limited energy. Phys. Rev. D 30, 1669–1679 (1984). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The computation can be speeded up and made more serial by compressing the computer.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, as seems highly unlikely, it is possible to extrapolate the exponential progress of Moore's law into the future, then it will only take two hundred and fifty years to make up the forty orders of magnitude in performance between current computers that perform 10 10 operations per second on 10 10 bits and our one kilogram ultimate laptop that performs 10 51 operations per second on 10 31 bits.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The heavy ion system could be programmed by manipulating and preparing the initial momenta and internal nuclear states of the ions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(The fact that only one operation per bit is performed suggests that there is insufficient time to reach thermal equilibrium, an observation that is confirmed by detailed simulations.)”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the theoretical evidence that most systems are computationally universal, the computer on which I am writing this article provides strong experimental evidence that whatever the correct underlying theory of physics is, it supports universal computation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
We have complete control over the actual state of the ultimate laptop, and are able to guide it through its logical steps while insulating it from all uncontrolled degrees of freedom.
“As above, we assume that we have complete control over the actual state of the ultimate laptop, and are able to guide it through its logical steps while insulating it from all uncontrolled degrees of freedom.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The computer encodes erroneous bits in the form of black-body radiation at the characteristic temperature 5.87 × 10^8 K of the computer's memory.
“To estimate the rate at which it can reject errors to the environment, assume that the computer encodes erroneous bits in the form of black-body radiation at the characteristic temperature 5 . 87 × 10 8 K of the computer's memory.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The volume occupied by the computer can be modeled as a collection of modes of elementary particles with total average energy E.
“The idea is simple: model the volume occupied by the computer as a collection of modes of elementary particles with total average energy E .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The only conserved quantities other than the computer's energy are angular momentum and electric charge, which are taken to be zero.
“For this calculation, assume that the only conserved quantities other than the computer's energy are angular momentum and electric charge, which we take to be zero.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Energy and entropy are dominated by black body radiation consisting of photons.
“A lower bound on the entropy can be obtained by assuming that energy and entropy are dominated by black body radiation consisting of photons.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All available bits are used.
“In keeping with the prescription that the ultimate laptop operates at the absolute limits given by physics, in what follows, we assume that all available bits are used.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Control of highly energetic systems in which all energy is put to use is possible in principle.
“In discussing the computational power of physical systems in which all energy is put to use, we assumed that such control is possible in principle, although it is certainly not possible in current practice.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is possible to prepare initial states of black-hole or quantum-gravity systems that cause their natural time evolution to carry out a computation.
“At the greater extremes of a black hole computer, we assumed that whatever theory (string theory, M theory?) turns out to be the correct theory of quantum matter and gravity, it is possible to prepare initial states of such systems that causes their natural time evolution to carry out a computation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the maximal rate with which quantum information can be processed [26]”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“As noted by Lloyd, the rate at which a computer can process a computation is limited by the energy available.”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“From equation ( 51) we clearly see that the more energy invested in a particular operation implies the faster it can be performed [26].”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“As a main result, we establish a rigorous link between this speed, the quantum speed limit, and the (energetic) cost of implementing such a shortcut to adiabaticity.”
From Trade-Off Between Speed and Cost in Shortcuts to Adiabaticity (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“which can be interpreted as the probability of mistaking r for s in a single-shot measurement.”
From Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit (2010) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Error-rate formula disagrees with the defined time ratio
MinorUsing the paper's definitions of tfl ip and t com gives 2 tfl ip/t com = π ̄hcS/(2 k B ln 2 ER). That does not equal the expression printed for the maximum error rate.
“Accordingly, the maximum error rate that the ultimate computer can tolerate is ǫ ≤ π ln 2¯ hcS/ 2 ER = 2 tfl ip /t com .”
“The amount of time it takes to send a message from one side of a computer of radius R to the other is t com = 2 R/c . The average time it takes a bit to flip in the ultimate laptop is the inverse of the number of operations per bit per second calculated above: tfl ip = π ¯ hS/k B 2 ln 2 E .”
Black-hole energy per bit disagrees with the stated temperature
MinorSubstituting R S = 2 Gm/c2 into the stated temperature gives k B T = ̄ hc3/(8πGm). The stated energy per bit is therefore 2 ln 2 k B T, not ln 2 k B T/2-a factor-of-four discrepancy.
“the energy per bit is E/I = mc 2 /I = ln2¯ hc 3 / 4 πmG = ln2 k B T/ 2, where T = ( ∂S/∂E ) -1 = ¯ hc/ 4 πk B R S”
“The Schwarzschild radius of a 1 kilogram computer is R S = 2 Gm/c 2 = 1 . 485 × 10 -27 meters.”
Figure 2 gives an incompatible communication time
MinorFigure 2 says communication across the laptop takes about 10^9 seconds, while a bit flips about 10^19 times per second. Those values give roughly 10^28 flips per communication time, contradicting the paper's stated ratio of about 10^10.
“In the ultimate laptop, each bit can flip ≈ 10 19 times per second, while the time to communicate from one side of the one liter computer to the other is on the order of 10 9 seconds: the ultimate laptop is highly parallel.”
“For the ultimate laptop, with 2 R = 10 -1 meters, 2 E/π ¯ h ≈ 10 51 operations per second, and S/k B ln 2 ≈ 10 31 bits, t com /tfl ip ≈ 10 10 .”
Citations
Cites
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata
Schwartz, J. T., von Neumann, J., & Burks, A. W. (1967) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2005041 · Cited by 5,468
Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process
Landauer, R. (1961) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.53.0183 · Cited by 4,980
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Logical Reversibility of Computation
Bennett, C. H. (1973) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.176.0525 · Cited by 3,679
Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.
Kojima, K.-I. (1969) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3,648
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Self-citationMicroscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
Strominger, A., & Vafa, C. (1996) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0 · Cited by 3,072
Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV
Roy, H. L. L., LeCam, L. M., & Neyman, J. (1969) · Revue de l Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute · doi:10.2307/1402306 · Cited by 2,878
Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.793 · Cited by 2,677
Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process
Landauer, R. W. (2000) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.441.0261 · Cited by 2,665
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
Strominger, A., & Vafa, C. (1996) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,109
The thermodynamics of computation—a review
Bennett, C. H. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02084158 · Cited by 2,006
Science and Information Theory
Brillouin, L., & Hellwarth, R. W. (1956) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3059856 · Cited by 1,928
Fredkin, E., & Toffoli, T. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857727 · Cited by 1,896
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Demonstration of a Fundamental Quantum Logic Gate
Monroe, C., Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E., Itano, W. M., & Wineland, D. J. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4714 · Cited by 1,586
Bulk Spin-Resonance Quantum Computation
Gershenfeld, N. A., & Chuang, I. L. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5298.350 · Cited by 1,528
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509
Measurement of Conditional Phase Shifts for Quantum Logic
Turchette, Q. A., Hood, C. J., Lange, W., Mabuchi, H., & Kimble, H. J. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4710 · Cited by 1,409
Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit
Mooij, J. E., Orlando, T. P., Levitov, L. S., Tian, L., van der Wal, C. H., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1036 · Cited by 1,356
Self-citationFredkin, E., & Toffoli, T. (2001) · Cited by 1,307
Quantum computational networks
Deutsch, D. E. (1989) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1989.0099 · Cited by 1,270
Benioff, P. (1980) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01011339 · Cited by 1,244
�ber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen
Szilard, L. (1929) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01341281 · Cited by 1,226
Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems
Bekenstein, J. D. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.287 · Cited by 1,182
Quantum Computation Over Continuous Variables
Lloyd, S., & Braunstein, S. L. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1784 · Cited by 1,145
Self-citationParticle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole
Page, D. N. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.198 · Cited by 1,133
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Feynman, R. P. (1985) · Optics News · doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 · Cited by 1,023
Preskill, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0167 · Cited by 994
Perfect Quantum Error Correcting Code
Laflamme, R., Miquel, C., Paz, J. P., & Zurek, W. H. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.198 · Cited by 966
Reversible logic and quantum computers
Peres, A. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.32.3266 · Cited by 913
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887
Landauer, R. W. (1991) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881299 · Cited by 804
Anandan, J., & Aharonov, Y. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1697 · Cited by 794
Decoherence, Continuous Observation, and Quantum Computing: A Cavity QED Model
Pellizzari, T., Gardiner, S. A., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3788 · Cited by 786
Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory
Susskind, L., & Uglum, J. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.2700 · Cited by 754
Experimental Implementation of Fast Quantum Searching
Chuang, I. L., Gershenfeld, N., & Kubinec, M. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.3408 · Cited by 707
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Mayer, M. E. (1994) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2808757 · Cited by 703
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Self-citationKnill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5349.342 · Cited by 663
A Potentially Realizable Quantum Computer
Lloyd, S. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.261.5128.1569 · Cited by 649
Self-citationProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Bubeck, S., Coester, C., & Rabani, Y. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3564246 · Cited by 615
Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm
Chuang, I. L., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Zhou, X., Leung, D. W., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30181 · Cited by 604
Self-citationImplementation of a quantum search algorithm on a quantum computer
Jones, J. A., Mosca, M., & Hansen, R. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30687 · Cited by 558
Yates, F., Garfinkel, A., Walter, D., & Yates, G. B. (1987) · Life Science Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0883-6 · Cited by 542
The physical nature of information
Landauer, R. W. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00453-7 · Cited by 526
Realizable Universal Quantum Logic Gates
Sleator, T., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4087 · Cited by 515
Complexity as thermodynamic depth
Lloyd, S., & Pagels, H. R. (1988) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(88)90094-2 · Cited by 514
Self-citationTime in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy
Aharonov, Y., & Bohm, D. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.122.1649 · Cited by 482
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Cited by 475
Simulating quantum systems on a quantum computer
Zalka, C. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0162 · Cited by 420
Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes
Das, S. R., & Mathur, S. D. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00453-1 · Cited by 380
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Fault-Tolerant Error Correction with Efficient Quantum Codes
Divincenzo, D. P., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3260 · Cited by 333
Universality in Quantum ComputationPreprint
Deutsch, D., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Cited by 322
Quantum Mechanical Models of Turing Machines That Dissipate No Energy
Benioff, P. A. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1581 · Cited by 305
Demons, Engines and the Second Law
Bennett, C. H. (1987) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1187-108 · Cited by 295
Thermodynamic cost of computation, algorithmic complexity and the information metric
Zurek, W. H. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341119a0 · Cited by 272
Proceedings 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(1997) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1997 · Cited by 271
Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics Implies Polynomial-Time Solution for NP -Complete and # P Problems
Abrams, D. S., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3992 · Cited by 269
Self-citationMinimal Energy Dissipation in Logic
Keyes, R. W., & Landauer, R. W. (1970) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.142.0152 · Cited by 262
Energy cost of information transfer
Bekenstein, J. D. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.46.623 · Cited by 252
Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two dimensions
Fiola, T. M., Preskill, J., Strominger, A., & Trivedi, S. P. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3987 · Cited by 242
Quantum-mechanical Maxwell’s demon
Lloyd, S. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.3374 · Cited by 229
Self-citationMaxwell, J. C. (1872) · AReg · Cited by 215
Dissipation and noise immunity in computation and communication
Landauer, R. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335779a0 · Cited by 208
(1990) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750307595 · Cited by 194
HOYLE, F., Fowler, W. A., Burbidge, G. R., & Burbidge, E. M. (1964) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/147825 · Cited by 185
Reversible electronic logic using switches
Merkle, R. C. (1993) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/4/1/002 · Cited by 178
Wilder, J. (1962) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1962.16.2.326 · Cited by 163
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1095-140 · Cited by 150
Self-citationClassical and quantum limitations on energy consumption in computation
Likharev, K. K. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857733 · Cited by 140
The Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics as the Language of Nature
Haisley, W. E., & Pagels, H. R. (1984) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1575004 · Cited by 116
Reversibility and Stability of Information Processing Systems
Zurek, W. H. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.391 · Cited by 112
Use of mutual information to decrease entropy: Implications for the second law of thermodynamics
Lloyd, S. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.39.5378 · Cited by 108
Self-citationEntropy content and information flow in systems with limited energy
Bekenstein, J. D. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.1669 · Cited by 104
The Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics as the Language of Nature
Pagels, H. R., & Layzer, D. (1982) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2914892 · Cited by 101
Coleman, S., Preskill, J. P., & Wilczek, F. A. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1975 · Cited by 71
Information transmission by electromagnetic field
Lebedev, D. S., & Levitin, L. B. (1966) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(66)90074-x · Cited by 69
Minimum energy requirements of information transfer and computing
Bremermann, H. J. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857726 · Cited by 63
Answer to Fock Concerning the Time Energy Indeterminacy Relation
Aharonov, Y., & Bohm, D. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.b1417 · Cited by 48
Physical limitations of rate, depth, and minimum energy in information processing
Levitin, L. B. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857732 · Cited by 45
MARGOLUS, N. (1986) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12451.x · Cited by 38
Quantum-mechanical computers and uncomputability
Lloyd, S. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.943 · Cited by 31
Self-citationPreskill, J. (1991) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1991/t36/028 · Cited by 29
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Quantum Computation
Lloyd, S. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552341 · Cited by 19
Self-citationEnergy cost of information transmission (along the path to understanding)
Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00051-7 · Cited by 18
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Levitin, L. B. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Radio Electronics part 3, 1–15 (Varna, Bulgaria, 1970).
- Margolus, N. & Levitin, L. B. in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Computation—PhysComp96 (eds Toffoli, T., Biafore, M. & Leão, J.) (New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, MA, 1996).
- Lecerf, Y. Machines de Turing réversibles. C.R. Acad. Sci. 257, 2597–2600 (1963).
- Seitz, C. L. et al. in Proceedings of the 1985 Chapel Hill Conference on VLSI (ed. Fuchs, H.) (Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1985).
- Younis, S. G. & Knight, T. F. in Proceedings of the 1993 Symposium on Integrated Systems, Seattle, Washington (eds Berrielo, G. & Ebeling, C.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).
- Margolus, N. in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity Vol. VIII (ed. Zurek, W. H.) 273–288 (Addison Wesley, Redwood City, 1991).
- Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F. & Havel, T. F. in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Computation—PhysComp96 (eds Toffoli, T., Biafore, M. & Leão, J.) 87–91 (New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, MA, 1996).
- Zel'dovich, Ya. B. & Novikov, I. D. Relativistic Astrophysics (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971 ).
- Novikov, I. D. & Frolov, V. P. Black Holes (Springer, Berlin, 1986).
- Thorne, K. S., Zurek, W. H. & Price R. H. in Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm Ch. VIII (eds Thorne, K. S., Price, R. H. & Macdonald, D. A.) 280– 340 (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 1986).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Self-citationExperimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics
Bérut, A., Arakelyan, A., Petrosyan, A., Ciliberto, S., Dillenschneider, R., & Lutz, E. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10872 · Cited by 1,248
Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. G., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.191301 · Cited by 830
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?
Bostrom, N. (2003) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00309 · Cited by 822
Complexity, action, and black holes
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. G., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.086006 · Cited by 661
Metadata
- Authors
- Lloyd, S.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lloyd, Seth
- ORCID
- Lloyd, Seth
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 406
- Issue
- 6799
- Pages
- 1047-1054
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1615222761
- Semantic Scholar
- 8eb5eab2824dda5f6600ba8fee378b6e725365a1
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- physical limits of computation, computational power, speed of light, quantum scale, gravitational constant, degrees of freedom, information processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review