Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indications for allo- and auto-SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2015

Sureda, A, Bader, P, Cesaro, S, Dreger, P, Duarte, R F, Dufour, C, Falkenburg, J H F, Farge-Bancel, D, Gennery, A, Kröger, N, Lanza, F, Marsh, J C, Nagler, A, Peters, C, Velardi, A, Mohty, M, Madrigal, A, for the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation·2015·Bone Marrow Transplantation
DOI 10.1038/bmt.2015.6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This is the sixth special report that the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation regularly publishes on the current practice and indications for haematopoietic SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders in Europe. Major changes have occurred in the field of haematopoietic SCT over the last years. Cord blood units as well as haploidentical donors have been increasingly used as stem cell sources for allo-SCT, thus, augmenting the possibility of finding a suitable donor for a patient. Continuous refinement of conditioning strategies has also expanded not only the number of potential indications but also has permitted consideration of older patients or those with co-morbidity for a transplant. There is accumulating evidence of the role of haematopoietic SCT in non-haematological disorders such as autoimmune diseases. On the other hand, the advent of new drugs and very effective targeted therapy has challenged the role of SCT in some instances or at least, modified its position in the treatment armamentarium of a given patient. An updated report with revised tables and operating definitions is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bmt.2015.6

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Sureda, A., Bader, P., Cesaro, S., Dreger, P., Duarte, R. F., Dufour, C., Falkenburg, J. H. F., Farge-Bancel, D., Gennery, A., Kröger, N., Lanza, F., Marsh, J. C., Nagler, A., Peters, C., Velardi, A., Mohty, M., Madrigal, A., & for the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Venue
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
1037-1056
ISSN
  • 0268-3369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5365
DOI
10.1038/bmt.2015.6
OpenAlex
W2044804132
Cited by
337
References
146
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.