Regulation of DNA‐damage responses and cell‐cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4
Open accessAbstract
The chromatin remodelling factor chromodomain helicase DNA‐binding protein 4 (CHD4) is a catalytic subunit of the NuRD transcriptional repressor complex. Here, we reveal novel functions for CHD4 in the DNA‐damage response (DDR) and cell‐cycle control. We show that CHD4 mediates rapid poly(ADP‐ribose)‐dependent recruitment of the NuRD complex to DNA‐damage sites, and we identify CHD4 as a phosphorylation target for the apical DDR kinase ataxia‐telangiectasia mutated. Functionally, we show that CHD4 promotes repair of DNA double‐strand breaks and cell survival after DNA damage. In addition, we show that CHD4 acts as an important regulator of the G1/S cell‐cycle transition by controlling p53 deacetylation. These results provide new insights into how the chromatin remodelling complex NuRD contributes to maintaining genome stability. This paper adds to the emerging concept that chromatin remodelling contributes to DNA‐damage responses. CHD4, a known NuRD component, is identified as ATM target, localizes to DNA breaks and contributes to repair while associating with PARPylated factors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other repressive complexes, such as NuRD and histone deacetylases (HDACs), also transiently accumulate at DSBs.
“Other repressive complexes, such as NuRD and histone deacetylases (HDACs) (43)(44)(45)(46), also transiently accumulate at DSBs, supporting this idea.”
From DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin (2014) · cites this paper as [43]
The Results section (page not provided) reports rapid, transient accumulation of the NuRD component CHD4 at laser-induced DNA-damage sites and detects HDAC1 there too. It does not establish that HDAC1’s accumulation is transient or that the observed recruitment is specific to double-strand breaks, although the Discussion links CHD4 to DSB repair. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredImmediately after DNA damage, both euchromatin and heterochromatin domains have similar structural organization, including high density of H3K9me3 and the presence of repressive complexes.
“Thus, immediately after DNA damage, both euchromatin and heterochromatin domains have similar structural organization, including high density of H3K9me3 and the presence of repressive complexes, such as kap-1, HP1α, methyltransferases, HDACs, and CHD3/CHD4 remodeling ATPases (31,32,(43)(44)(45)(46)(47).”
From DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin (2014) · cites this paper as [43]
The Results section (‘CHD4 is recruited to DNA-damage sites as part of the NuRD complex’; page unavailable) reports rapid CHD4 recruitment and detection of HDAC1 and MTA2 at damaged sites. It does not compare euchromatin with heterochromatin or establish similar structural organization, high H3K9me3 density, or the presence of the other listed complexes in both domains. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy
Farmer, H., McCabe, N., Lord, C. J., Tutt, A. N. J., Johnson, D. A., Richardson, T. B., Santarosa, M., Dillon, K. J., Hickson, I., Knights, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03445 · Cited by 6,683 · see citing works
Self-citationThe DNA-damage response in human biology and disease
Jackson, S. P., & Bartek, J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08467 · Cited by 6,092 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In response to DNA damage, cells initiate a coordinated programme of events, termed the DNA-damage response (DDR), which is critical for maintenance of genome integrity and the prevention of ageing and tumourigenesis (Harper and Elledge, 2007; Jackson and Bartek, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139
Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S., & Bonner, W. M. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858 · Cited by 5,438 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundBlinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage
Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B. A., Smogorzewska, A., McDonald, E. R., Hurov, K. E., Luo, J., Bakalarski, C. E., Zhao, Z., Solimini, N., Lerenthal, Y., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140321 · Cited by 3,075 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Interestingly, proteomic screens in human cells have identified CHD4 as a target for DDR kinases (Matsuoka et al, 2007; Mu et al, 2007; Stokes et al, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe biology of chromatin remodeling complexes.
Clapier, C. R., & Cairns, B. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223 · Cited by 2,384 · cited 3× · see citing works
“It is, therefore, possible that such factors will display synergistic and/or antagonistic functions in the regulation of chromatin compaction at DNA-damage sites, as happens in the context of transcription (Ramirez-Carrozzi et al, 2006; Clapier and Cairns, 2009).”
BackgroundAdvances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology
Abrahams, B. S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2346 · Cited by 1,866 · see citing works
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Harper, J. W., & Elledge, S. J. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015 · Cited by 1,705 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In response to DNA damage, cells initiate a coordinated programme of events, termed the DNA-damage response (DDR), which is critical for maintenance of genome integrity and the prevention of ageing and tumourigenesis (Harper and Elledge, 2007; Jackson and Bartek, 2009).”
BackgroundKruse, J.-P., & Gu, W. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.050 · Cited by 1,610 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundPARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond
Rouleau, M., Patel, A., Hendzel, M. J., Kaufmann, S. H., & Poirier, G. G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2812 · Cited by 1,298 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…DNA nicks also activate poly(ADP-ribose) poly- merase (PARP) enzymes that modify target proteins with poly(ADP-ribose) chains (PAR chains) at DNA-damage sites, thereby stimulating the recruitment and/or activity of repair factors (Malanga and Althaus, 2005; Hakme et al, 2008; Rouleau et al, 2010).”
BackgroundHickson, I., Zhao, Y., Richardson, C. J., Green, S. J., Martin, N. M. B., Orr, A. I., Reaper, P. M., Jackson, S. P., Curtin, N. J., & Smith, G. C. M. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-2727 · Cited by 1,220 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Furthermore, we found that this CHD4 phosphorylation was prevented when cells were incubated with Wortmannin (Sarkaria et al, 1998) or the ATM inhibitor KU-55933 (Hickson et al, 2004), but not the DNA-PK inhibitor NU-7441 (Leahy et al, 2004) (see Figure 3B; Supplementary Figure S4B).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFrequency of specific cancer types in dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a population-based study
Hill, C. L., Zhang, Y., Sigurgeirsson, B., Pukkala, ., Mellemkjær, L., Airio, A., Evans, S. R., & Felson, D. T. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03540-6 · Cited by 1,188 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These findings thereby help explain recent observa- tions linking NuRD to cellular ageing (Pegoraro et al, 2009) and might shed light on why patients expressing auto- antibodies against CHD4 display higher cancer incidence (Hill et al, 2001).”
BackgroundStucki, M., Clapperton, J. A., Mohammad, D. H., Yaffe, M. B., Smerdon, S. J., & Jackson, S. P. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.038 · Cited by 1,103 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSingle-strand break repair and genetic disease
Caldecott, K. W. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2380 · Cited by 1,034 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To address the biological significance of CHD4 to the DDR, we analysed the effects of its depletion, focusing initially on PARP-mediated repair of DNA breaks (Caldecott, 2008) and ATM-dependent signalling.”
BackgroundXue, Y., Wong, J., Moreno, G. T., Young, M. K., Côté, J., & Wang, W. (1998) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80299-3 · Cited by 983 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…complex (nucleosome remodelling deacetylase) that is unique in combining chromatin remodelling activity with histone deacetylase and demethylase functions involved in transcriptional repression (Wade et al, 1998; Xue et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1998; Denslow and Wade, 2007; Ramirez and Hagman, 2009).”
BackgroundDeacetylation of p53 modulates its effect on cell growth and apoptosis
Luo, J., Su, F., Chen, D., Shiloh, A., & Gu, W. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042612 · Cited by 818 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundInfluentialZhang, Y., LeRoy, G., Seelig, H.-P., Lane, W. S., & Reinberg, D. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81758-4 · Cited by 814 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…complex (nucleosome remodelling deacetylase) that is unique in combining chromatin remodelling activity with histone deacetylase and demethylase functions involved in transcriptional repression (Wade et al, 1998; Xue et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1998; Denslow and Wade, 2007; Ramirez and Hagman, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialO'Driscoll, M., Ruiz-Perez, V. L., Woods, C. G., Jeggo, P. A., & Goodship, J. A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1129 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
Essential function of histone deacetylase 1 in proliferation control and CDK inhibitor repression
Lagger, G., O'Carroll, D., Rembold, M., Khier, H., Tischler, J., Weitzer, G., Schuettengruber, B., Hauser, C., Brunmeir, R., Jenuwein, T., et al. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/21.11.2672 · Cited by 760 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Cells were analysed 48–72 h after transfection.”
BackgroundMurr, R., Loizou, J. I., Yang, Y.-G., Cuenin, C., Li, H., Wang, Z.-Q., & Herceg, Z. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1343 · Cited by 613 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, CHD4 appears to be one of the several, and possibly many, chromatin remodelling factors recruited to DNA breaks in mammalian cells (Murr et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Gottschalk et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Timinszky et al, 2009).”
BackgroundPoly(ADP-ribose)–Dependent Regulation of DNA Repair by the Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme ALC1
Ahel, D., Hořejší, Z., Wiechens, N., Polo, S. E., Garcia-Wilson, E., Ahel, I., Flynn, H., Skehel, M., West, S. C., Jackson, S. P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177321 · Cited by 588 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…it is tempting to speculate that this could be through local remo- delling of chromatin to facilitate DNA repair, perhaps in ways similar to those proposed for yeast and other mammalian chromatin remodelling complexes (Park et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Sinha et al, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPoly(ADP-ribose) Binds to Specific Domains in DNA Damage Checkpoint Proteins
Pleschke, J. M., Kleczkowska, H. E., Strohm, M., & Althaus, F. R. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m006520200 · Cited by 536 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…does not display canonical PAR-binding domains (Karras et al, 2005; Ahel et al, 2008), sequence analyses revealed the presence of putative PAR-binding motifs in the CHD4 amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions that loosely matched a characterized consensus (Pleschke et al, 2000; Gagne et al, 2008).”
Background(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response
van Attikum, H., & Gasser, S. M. (2009) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.001 · Cited by 515 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and Cairns, 2009; van Attikum and Gasser, 2009).”
BackgroundThe macro domain is an ADP‐ribose binding module
Karras, G. I., Kustatscher, G., Buhecha, H. R., Allen, M. D., Pugieux, C., Sait, F., Bycroft, M., & Ladurner, A. G. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600664 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Epigenetics in cancer: Targeting chromatin modifications
Ellis, L., Atadja, P. W., & Johnstone, R. W. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-08-0860 · Cited by 483 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…functions for CHD4 and other chromatin remodelling components is also relevant for cancer research in general, given that drugs targeting chromatin-modifying enzymes are being explored as anti- cancer therapies, both for use alone and in combination with DNA-damaging treatments (Ellis et al, 2009).”
BackgroundThe human Mi-2/NuRD complex and gene regulation
Denslow, S. A., & Wade, P. A. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210611 · Cited by 479 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…complex (nucleosome remodelling deacetylase) that is unique in combining chromatin remodelling activity with histone deacetylase and demethylase functions involved in transcriptional repression (Wade et al, 1998; Xue et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1998; Denslow and Wade, 2007; Ramirez and Hagman, 2009).”
BackgroundDistinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage.
Lukas, C., Falck, J., Bartkova, J., Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2003) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb945 · Cited by 474 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Localized DNA damage was generated by exposure of cells to a UV-A laser (Limoli and Ward, 1993; Lukas et al, 2003).”
BackgroundThe emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance
Misteli, T., & Soutoglou, E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2651 · Cited by 468 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.”
BackgroundRamirez-Carrozzi, V., Nazarian, A. A., Li, C.-Y. C., Gore, S., Sridharan, R., Imbalzano, A., & Smale, S. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1383206 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Wade, P. A., Jones, P. L., Vermaak, D., & Wolffe, A. P. (1998) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70328-8 · Cited by 433 · cited 6× · see citing works
“CHD4 is well characterized as a catalytic subunit of the NuRD transcriptional repressor complex (Wade et al, 1998; Xue et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1998; Denslow and Wade, 2007; Ramirez and Hagman, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPoly(ADP-ribose)-binding zinc finger motifs in DNA repair/checkpoint proteins
Ahel, I., Ahel, D., Matsusaka, T., Clark, A. J., Pines, J., Boulton, S. J., & West, S. C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06420 · Cited by 429 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and Cairns, 2009; van Attikum and Gasser, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodLeahy, J. J. J., Golding, B. T., Griffin, R. J., Hardcastle, I. R., Richardson, C. J., Rigoreau, L. J. M., & Smith, G. C. M. (2004) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.060 · Cited by 417 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Furthermore, we found that this CHD4 phosphorylation was prevented when cells were incubated with Wortmannin (Sarkaria et al, 1998) or the ATM inhibitor KU-55933 (Hickson et al, 2004), but not the DNA-PK inhibitor NU-7441 (Leahy et al, 2004) (see Figure 3B; Supplementary Figure S4B).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA macrodomain-containing histone rearranges chromatin upon sensing PARP1 activation
Timinszky, G., Till, S., Hassa, P. O., Hothorn, M., Kustatscher, G., Nijmeijer, B., Colombelli, J., Altmeyer, M., Stelzer, E. H. K., Scheffzek, K., et al. (2009) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1664 · Cited by 416 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, CHD4 appears to be one of the several, and possibly many, chromatin remodelling factors recruited to DNA breaks in mammalian cells (Murr et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Gottschalk et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Timinszky et al, 2009).”
BackgroundGagné, J., Isabelle, M., Lo, K. S., Bourassa, S., Hendzel, M. J., Dawson, V. L., Dawson, T. M., & Poirier, G. G. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn771 · Cited by 416 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…does not display canonical PAR-binding domains (Karras et al, 2005; Ahel et al, 2008), sequence analyses revealed the presence of putative PAR-binding motifs in the CHD4 amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions that loosely matched a characterized consensus (Pleschke et al, 2000; Gagne et al, 2008).”
BackgroundPoly(ADP-ribosyl)ation directs recruitment and activation of an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler
Gottschalk, A. J., Timinszky, G., Kong, S. E., Jin, J., Cai, Y., Swanson, S. K., Washburn, M. P., Florens, L. A., Ladurner, A. G., Conaway, J. W., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906920106 · Cited by 358 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, CHD4 appears to be one of the several, and possibly many, chromatin remodelling factors recruited to DNA breaks in mammalian cells (Murr et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Gottschalk et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Timinszky et al, 2009).”
Background'Protein Modifications: Beyond the Usual Suspects' Review Series
Ikeda, F., & Đikić, I. (2008) · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Profiling of UV-induced ATM/ATR signaling pathways
Stokes, M. P., Rush, A. J., MacNeill, J., Ren, J. M., Sprott, K. M., Nardone, J., Yang, V., Beausoleil, S. A., Gygi, S. P., Livingstone, M., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707579104 · Cited by 313 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Notably, CHD4 is a likely target for DDR kinases (Matsuoka et al, 2007; Mu et al, 2007; Stokes et al, 2007), and loss of function of CHD4 or other NuRD components causes accumulation of DNA damage and features of accelerated ageing (Pegoraro et al, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAgeing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex
Pegoraro, G., Kubben, N., Wickert, U., Goehler, H., Hoffmann, K., & Misteli, T. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1971 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Chromatin dynamics and the preservation of genetic information
Downs, J. A., Nussenzweig, M. C., & Nussenzweig, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05980 · Cited by 285 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and Cairns, 2009; van Attikum and Gasser, 2009).”
BackgroundMammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double‐strand break repair by promoting γ‐H2AX induction
Park, J., Park, E., Lee, H.-S., Kim, S. J., Hur, S.-K., Imbalzano, A. N., & Kwon, J. (2006) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601291 · Cited by 280 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…it is tempting to speculate that this could be through local remo- delling of chromatin to facilitate DNA repair, perhaps in ways similar to those proposed for yeast and other mammalian chromatin remodelling complexes (Park et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Sinha et al, 2009).”
BackgroundThe role of poly(ADP-ribose) in the DNA damage signaling network
Malanga, M., & Althaus, F. R. (2005) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/o05-038 · Cited by 274 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…DNA nicks also activate poly(ADP-ribose) poly- merase (PARP) enzymes that modify target proteins with poly(ADP-ribose) chains (PAR chains) at DNA-damage sites, thereby stimulating the recruitment and/or activity of repair factors (Malanga and Althaus, 2005; Hakme et al, 2008; Rouleau et al, 2010).”
BackgroundGlobal chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response
Murga, M., Jaco, I., Fan, Y., Soria, R., Martínez-Pastor, B., Cuadrado, M., Yang, S.-M., Blasco, M. A., Skoultchi, A. I., & Fernández-Capetillo, Ó. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200704140 · Cited by 236 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, compacted chromatin can be refractory to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and…”
BackgroundRegulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks
Panier, S., & Durocher, D. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.013 · Cited by 193 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This then brings about further chromatin alterations that permit recruitment of additional DDR mediators such as p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) and breast cancer 1 (BRCA1; Panier and Durocher, 2009).”
BackgroundBRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response
Peng, G., Yim, E.-K., Dai, H., Jackson, A. P., van der Burgt, I., Pan, M., Hu, R., Li, K., & Lin, S. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1895 · Cited by 186 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…it is tempting to speculate that this could be through local remo- delling of chromatin to facilitate DNA repair, perhaps in ways similar to those proposed for yeast and other mammalian chromatin remodelling complexes (Park et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Sinha et al, 2009).”
Mu, J., Wáng, Y., Luo, H., Leng, M., Zhang, J., Yang, T., Besusso, D., Jung, S. Y., & Qin, J. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c700079200 · Cited by 172 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Notably, CHD4 is a likely target for DDR kinases (Matsuoka et al, 2007; Mu et al, 2007; Stokes et al, 2007), and loss of function of CHD4 or other NuRD components causes accumulation of DNA damage and features of accelerated ageing (Pegoraro et al, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe expanding field of poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation reactions
Hakmé, A., Wong, H., Dantzer, F., & Schreiber, V. (2008) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2008.191 · Cited by 148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…DNA nicks also activate poly(ADP-ribose) poly- merase (PARP) enzymes that modify target proteins with poly(ADP-ribose) chains (PAR chains) at DNA-damage sites, thereby stimulating the recruitment and/or activity of repair factors (Malanga and Althaus, 2005; Hakme et al, 2008; Rouleau et al, 2010).”
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair
Osley, M. A., Tsukuda, T., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2007) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.07.011 · Cited by 141 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and Cairns, 2009; van Attikum and Gasser, 2009).”
BackgroundA New Method for Introducing Double-Strand Breaks into Cellular DNA
Limoli, C. L., & Ward, J. F. (1993) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3578455 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Localized DNA damage was generated by exposure of cells to a UV-A laser (Limoli and Ward, 1993; Lukas et al, 2003).”
BackgroundHakmé, A., Wong, H., Dantzer, F., & Schreiber, V. (2008) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2008.213 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Chromatin remodeling in DNA double-strand break repair
Bao, Y., & Shen, X. (2007) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2007.02.010 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to full DDR activation (Murga et al, 2007), and accumulating evidence suggests pivotal and direct functions for chromatin remodelling factors in relieving such inhibitory effects (Bao and Shen, 2007; Downs et al, 2007; Osley et al, 2007; Clapier and Cairns, 2009; van Attikum and Gasser, 2009).”
BackgroundRamírez, J. A., & Hagman, J. R. (2009) · Epigenetics · doi:10.4161/epi.4.8.10108 · Cited by 99 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…complex (nucleosome remodelling deacetylase) that is unique in combining chromatin remodelling activity with histone deacetylase and demethylase functions involved in transcriptional repression (Wade et al, 1998; Xue et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1998; Denslow and Wade, 2007; Ramirez and Hagman, 2009).”
BackgroundRecombinational Repair within Heterochromatin Requires ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling
Sinha, M., Watanabe, S., Johnson, A. M., Moazed, D., & Peterson, C. L. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.013 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…it is tempting to speculate that this could be through local remo- delling of chromatin to facilitate DNA repair, perhaps in ways similar to those proposed for yeast and other mammalian chromatin remodelling complexes (Park et al, 2006; Ahel et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2009; Sinha et al, 2009).”
BackgroundModifications of p53: competing for the lysines
Carter, S., & Vousden, K. H. (2009) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2008.11.010 · Cited by 54 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Consistent with this, we found that depletion of the p300 acetyltransferase, which is responsible for p53 Lys-382 acetylation (Carter and Vousden, 2009; Kruse and Gu, 2009), reduced both p53 acetylation and p21 levels, and moreover, rescued cell-cycle progression in CHD4-depleted cells (Figure 6F and G), supporting th…”
BackgroundSpecies richness: Does flower power explain beetle-mania?
Barraclough, T. G., Barclay, M. V. L., & Vogler, A. P. (1998) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00527-1 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368 · see citing works
“…22, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 181 182 Molecular Cell 40, October 22, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. recruitment of DNA repair and chromatin modifying complexes, such as polycomb and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes, at DNA damage sites (Polo et al., 2010; Schreiber et al., 2006; Chou et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling
Ray Chaudhuri, A., & Nussenzweig, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.53 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more
Shiloh, Y., & Ziv, Y. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3546 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy
Jones, P. A., Issa, J. J., & Baylin, S. B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.93 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications
Polo, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2021311 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
“PARylation at DNA breaks is also required for accrual of the chromatin remodeling factors ALC1 and CHD4 (Ahel et al. 2009; Gottschalk et al. 2009; Chou et al. 2010; Polo et al. 2010), the Polycomb histone-modifying complex (Chou et al. 2010), and the histone variant macroH2A (Timinszky et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationATP-dependent chromatin remodeling: genetics, genomics and mechanisms
Hargreaves, D. C., & Crabtree, G. R. (2011) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2011.32 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Lukas, J., Lukas, C., & Bartek, J. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2344 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
“Although binding to PAR chains seems to recruit these complexes to DNA break”
BackgroundChromatin Remodeling at DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Price, B. D., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.011 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
“The recruitment of NuRD complexes to DSBs requires PARylation of the chromatin by PARP1 (Chou et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010).”
InfluentialCancer biology and NuRD: a multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex
Lai, A. Y., & Wade, P. A. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3091 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
“Other NuRD complex subunits have also been shown to have post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation and acetylatio”
BackgroundThe diverse roles and clinical relevance of PARPs in DNA damage repair: Current state of the art
Vos, M. D., Schreiber, V., & Dantzer, F. (2012) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2012.03.018 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Adamson, B., Smogorzewska, A., Sigoillot, F. D., King, R. W., & Elledge, S. J. (2012) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2426 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
“PARP1 mediates recruitment of repair proteins to DNA damage via the transient polymerization of branched poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) structures; and it is likely that RBMX localization is similarly facilitated 1, 22, 23 .”
Study, T. I., Sifrim, A., Study, T. D. D. D., Hitz, M., Wilsdon, A., Breckpot, J., Turki, S. H. A., Thienpont, B., McRae, J. F., Fitzgerald, T. W., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3627 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Gallo, M. L., O’Hara, A. J., Rudd, M. L., Urick, M. E., Hansen, N. F., O’Neil, N. J., Price, J. C., Zhang, S., England, B. M., Godwin, A. K., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2455 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Ayrapetov, M. K., Gursoy-Yuzugullu, O., Xu, C., Xu, Y., & Price, B. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403565111 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease
Ordovás, J. M., & Smith, C. E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2010.104 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
SIRT6 recruits SNF2H to DNA break sites, preventing genomic instability through chromatin remodeling
Toiber, D., Erdel, F., Bouazoune, K., Silberman, D. M., Zhong, L., Mulligan, P., Sebastian, C., Cosentino, C., Martinez-Pastor, B., Giacosa, S., et al. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.018 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
“Various chromatin remodelers, including INO80 (Gospodinov et al., 2011; Kashiwaba et al., 2010; Neumann et al., 2012; Papamichos-Chronakis et al., 2011), SMARCAD1 (Fun 30 in yeast) (Chen et al., 2012; Costelloe et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2010), p400 (Xu et al., 2010, 2012), chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4 (…”
Li, L., Shi, L., Yang, S., Yan, R., Zhang, D., Yang, J., He, L., Li, W., Yi, X., Sun, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12235 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
“KU-55933 (118500) and NADþ (20-221) were from Millipore.”
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Prime, Repair, Restore: The Active Role of Chromatin in the DNA Damage Response
Soria, G., Polo, S. E., & Almouzni, G. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.002 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular Genetics of Endometrial Carcinoma
Bell, D. W., & Ellenson, L. H. (2018) · Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043609 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
ATM and ATR signaling at a glance
Awasthi, P., Foiani, M., & Kumar, A. (2015) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.169730 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“ATM-mediated pathways have also been shown to be involved in chromatin relaxation (Goodarzi et al., 2008; Moyal et al., 2011; Polo et al., 2010; Ziv et al., 2006), nucleosome remodeling (Goodarzi et al.”
BackgroundMastrocola, A. S., Kim, S. H., Trinh, A. T., Rodenkirch, L. A., & Tibbetts, R. S. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.497974 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
“Both the SSB repair protein XRCC1 and chromatin remodeling factor CHD4 are recruited to DNA damage in a PARP-dependent manner (21, 68); however, depletion of FUS did not disrupt targeting of either XRCC1 or CHD4 (data not shown).”
BackgroundGoodarzi, A. A., Kurka, T., & Jeggo, P. A. (2011) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2077 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
SIRT1 collaborates with ATM and HDAC1 to maintain genomic stability in neurons
Dobbin, M. M., Madabhushi, R., Pan, L., Chen, Y., Kim, D., Gao, J., Ahanonu, B., Pao, P.-C., Qiu, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3460 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Histone methylation and the DNA damage response
Gong, F., & Miller, K. M. (2017) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.09.003 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“Interestingly, PARP plays an important role in damage-induced transcriptional repression, including by promoting the recruitment of the ZMYND8-NuRD chromatin remodeling complex to damage chromatin where it participates in repressing transcription in the vicinity of DSBs [80, 95, 99, 100], Given these results for other…”
BackgroundGong, F., Chiu, L.-Y., Cox, B., Aymard, F., Clouaire, T., Leung, J. W., Cammarata, M., Perez, M., Agarwal, P., Brodbelt, J. S., et al. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.252189.114 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“The DNA damage recruitment dynamics of ZMYND8 are similar to those reported for the NuRD complex (i.e., CHD4) (Polo et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialChromatin and the genome integrity network
Papamichos‐Chronakis, M., & Peterson, C. L. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3345 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Murata, M. M., Kong, X., Moncada, E., Chen, Y., Imamura, H., Wang, P., Berns, M. W., Yokomori, K., & Digman, M. A. (2019) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e18-10-0650 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
The Repair and Signaling Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Goodarzi, A. A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2013) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407676-1.00001-9 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in the DNA-damage response
Lans, H., Marteijn, J. A. F., & Vermeulen, W. (2012) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-5-4 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“Furthermore, many subunits of NuRD are recruited to DSBs in a, at least for CHD4 and MTA1, poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent manner, but surprisingly, do not require phosphorylation of H2AX [128-131].”
BackgroundInfluentialActivation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin
Burgess, R. C., Burman, B., Kruhlak, M. J., & Misteli, T. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“Somewhat paradoxically, proteins that promote chromatin compaction, such as HP1, KAP-1, SPOC1, su(var)3-9 methyltransferase variant 1 (SUV3-9), PDRM2 methyltransferase, macro H2A, and histone deacetylases (HDACs), have also been shown to be recruited to the sites of DSBs (Ayoub et al., 2009; Ayrapetov et al., 2014; Ba…”
BackgroundInfluentialAllen, H. F., Wade, P. A., & Kutateladze, T. G. (2013) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-012-1256-2 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“NuRD complex rapidly accumulates in cells at sites of doublestrand breaks in a manner dependent on the activity of poly(ADP ribose) polymerase, PARP [95, 97].”
Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response
Dantuma, N. P., & van Attikum, H. (2015) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201592595 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“…was therefore proposed that the PAR-recruited NuRD complex facilitates the latter process by imposing a transient repressive chromatin state at DNA lesions, although a causal CHD4 contribution to the removal of RNA polymerase II still needs to be established (Chou et al , 2010; Polo et al , 2010).”
InfluentialXia, L., Huang, W., Bellani, M. A., Seidman, M. M., Wu, K., Fan, D., Nie, Y., Cai, Y., Zhang, Y. W., Yu, L., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.005 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
“One defined role of CHD4 in DSB repair is to recruit repressive chromatin to open chromatin regions in active gene promoters (Chou et al., 2010; Larsen et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010), serving to protect transcribed regions during repair (Chou et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialHistone ADP-ribosylation in DNA repair, replication and transcription
Messner, S., & Hottiger, M. O. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.06.001 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
XRCC1 prevents toxic PARP1 trapping during DNA base excision repair
Demin, A. A., Hirota, K., Tsuda, M., Adamowicz, M., Hailstone, R., Bražina, J., Gittens, W. H., Kalasová, I., Shao, Z., Zha, S., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.05.009 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex in development and disease
Basta, J., & Rauchman, M. (2015) · Translational Research · doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2014.05.003 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“p53 acetylation status, [2]), independent of regulating gene expression.”
Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers
Liu, G., Chen, T., Zhang, X., Ma, X., & Shi, H. (2022) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.181 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
DNA single-strand break repair and human genetic disease
Caldecott, K. W. (2022) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2022.04.010 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Chromatin remodelers: We are the drivers!!
Tyagi, M. V., Imam, N., Verma, K., & Patel, A. K. (2016) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2016.1211217 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
“other syndromes and multi-system developmental disorders.(113) Studies have shown temporal and tissue specific function of chromatin remodelers during heart development and thereby any mutation leads to the advancement of many cardiovascular tissues.”
BackgroundHistone demethylase KDM5A regulates the ZMYND8–NuRD chromatin remodeler to promote DNA repair
Gong, F., Clouaire, T., Aguirrebengoa, M., Legube, G., & Miller, K. M. (2017) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201611135 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
“…and PARP inhibitors in cancer settings deficient in the KDM5A-ZMY ND8–NuRD JCB • Volume 216 • NumBer 7 • 20171968 pathway, given the therapeutic benefit associated with these treatments in DDR-deficient cancers (Helleday et al., 2008; Chou et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010; Spruijt et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIzhar, L., Adamson, B., Ciccia, A., Lewis, J., Vaites, L. P., Leng, Y., Liang, A. C. T., Westbrook, T. F., Harper, J. W., & Elledge, S. J. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.053 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
“…(PAR) structures and are responsible for the recruitment of a number of factors to sites of DNA damage, including ALC1, RBMX, and components of MRN and NuRD complexes, among others (Adamson et al., 2012; Ahel et al., 2009; Chou et al., 2010; Haince et al., 2008; Polo et al., 2010).”
InfluentialMansfield, R. E., Musselman, C. A., Kwan, A. H., Oliver, S. S., Garske, A. L., Davrazou, F., Denu, J. M., Kutateladze, T. G., & Mackay, J. P. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.208207 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Reprogramming cellular events by poly(ADP-ribose)-binding proteins
Krietsch, J., Rouleau, M., Pic, É., Ethier, C., Dawson, T. M., Dawson, V. L., Masson, J., Poirier, G. G., & Gagné, J. (2012) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.005 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Hu, Y., Petit, S. A., Ficarro, S. B., Toomire, K. J., Xie, A., Lim, E., Cao, S. A., Park, E., Eck, M. J., Scully, R., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0891 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
“Among their interacting partners are proteins recently shown to be involved in cellular responses to DSBs, including SFPQ (15), CHD4 (16), and UBR5 (17) (Supplementary Fig.”
Krietsch, J., Caron, M., Gagné, J., Ethier, C., Vignard, J., Vincent, M., Rouleau, M., Hendzel, M. J., Poirier, G. G., & Masson, J. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks798 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“To date, many proteins have been shown to be recruited in a PAR-dependent manner by cell imaging techniques: MRE11 (6), NBS1 (6), APLF (46), XRCC1 (57), CHD4 (58), NuRD (59) and ALC1 (47).”
BackgroundQuantitative proteomics profiling of the poly(ADP-ribose)-related response to genotoxic stress
Gagné, J., Pic, É., Isabelle, M., Krietsch, J., Éthier, C., Paquet, É. R., Kelly, I., Boutin, M., Moon, K., Foster, L. J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks486 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“The recent identification of chromatinassociated proteins whose recruitment to DNA damage sites is pADPr-dependent [e.g.: CHD4 (38,73), MTA1(73), MRE11(74), NBS1(74), ALC1(39,40), APLF (75,76), XRCC1 (68), BMI-1 (77), MEL-18 (73)] also points towards this model.”
Epigenetic regulation of autophagy by the methyltransferase EZH2 through an MTOR-dependent pathway
Wei, F.-Z., Cao, Z., Wang, X., Wang, H., Cai, M.-Y., Li, T., Hattori, N., Wang, D., Du, Y., Song, B., et al. (2015) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1117734 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
DDB2 promotes chromatin decondensation at UV-induced DNA damage
Luijsterburg, M. S., Lindh, M., Ács, K., Vrouwe, M. G., Pines, A., van Attikum, H., Mullenders, L. H. F., & Dantuma, N. P. (2012) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201106074 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Additionally, the DNA damage– induced reduction in histone density also required the activity of PARP1, which has recently been linked to chromatin remodeling in response to double-strand DNA breaks (Ahel et al., 2009; Gottschalk et al., 2009; Chou et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010).”
Khoury-Haddad, H., Guttmann‐Raviv, N., Ipenberg, I., Huggins, D. J., Jeyasekharan, A. D. D., & Ayoub, N. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317585111 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“Similarly, it was recently shown that PARP1 and Really Interesting New Gene finger protein (RNF)8 ubiquitin ligase regulate the recruitment of the catalytic subunit of the NuRD repressor complex, CHD4, to DNA-breakage sites (49, 61).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHistone demethylase KDM5B is a key regulator of genome stability
Li, X., Liu, L., Yang, S., Song, N., Zhou, X., Gao, J., Yu, N., Shan, L., Wang, Q., Liang, J., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1324036111 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Smeenk, G., Wiegant, W. W., Marteijn, J. A. F., Luijsterburg, M. S., Sroczynski, N., Costelloe, T., Romeijn, R. J., Pastink, A., Mailand, N., Vermeulen, W., et al. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.109413 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“itself and acceptor proteins, directs the recruitment of the chromatin remodeling enzymes ALC1 and CHD4 to DSBs (Ahel et al., 2009; Chou et al., 2010; Gottschalk et al., 2009; Luijsterburg et al., 2012a; Polo et al., 2010).”
BackgroundChromatin and the DNA damage response: The cancer connection
Luijsterburg, M. S., & van Attikum, H. (2011) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2011.06.001 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Snf2-family proteins: chromatin remodellers for any occasion
Ryan, D., & Owen‐Hughes, T. (2011) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.022 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“Kinetic analysis of Alc1 retention at laserinduced damage sites suggest Alc1 acts at an early stage in the DDR. 48.”
BackgroundInfluentialWeiss, K., Terhal, P. A., Cohen, L., Bruccoleri, M., Irving, M. D., Martinez, A. F., Rosenfeld, J. A., Machol, K., Yang, Y., Liu, P., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.001 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Robert, C., & Rassool, F. V. (2012) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394387-3.00003-3 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Automodification switches PARP-1 function from chromatin architectural protein to histone chaperone
Muthurajan, U. M., Chassé, M. H., Hieb, A. R., Clark, N., Kramer, M., Yao, T., & Luger, K. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405005111 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The multifaceted influence of histone deacetylases on DNA damage signalling and DNA repair
Roos, W. P., & Krumm, A. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw922 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“For DSBs, PARP1 and the PAR chains cause the recruitment of the nucleosome remodelling deacetylase (NuRD) complex (100,101) and the polycomb group (PcG) proteins (101–103), all of which are essential for the effective repair of DSBs (100,102–104) (Figure 1C).”
BackgroundThe histone demethylase LSD1/KDM1A promotes the DNA damage response
Mosammaparast, N., Kim, H., Laurent, B., Zhao, Y. J., Lim, H. J., Majid, M. C., Dango, S., Luo, Y., Hempel, K., Sowa, M. E., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201302092 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“…chromatin marks, such as methylation of H3K9, and recruitment of the NuRD–CHD4 complex are two other examples of a transient, repressive chromatin state that appear to be critical for the DDR (Chou et al., 2010; Larsen et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010; Smeenk et al., 2010; Chiolo et al., 2011).”
InfluentialAcetylation Reader Proteins: Linking Acetylation Signaling to Genome Maintenance and Cancer
Gong, F., Chiu, L.-Y., & Miller, K. M. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006272 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
NuRD–ZNF827 recruitment to telomeres creates a molecular scaffold for homologous recombination
Conomos, D., Reddel, R. R., & Pickett, H. A. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2877 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Cai, Y., Geutjes, E.-J., de Lint, K., Roepman, P., Bruurs, L. J. M., Yu, L., Wang, W., van Blijswijk, J., Mohammad, H. P., de Rink, I., et al. (2013) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2013.178 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
The Chromatin Response to DNA Breaks: Leaving a Mark on Genome Integrity
Smeenk, G., & van Attikum, H. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-174504 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“In contrast, both RNF8 and PARP activity appeared to contribute to CHD4 assembly at sites of DNA damage (132, 135).”
BackgroundSellou, H., Lebeaupin, T., Chapuis, C., Smith, R., Hegele, A., Singh, H. R., Kozłowski, M., Bultmann, S., Ladurner, A., Timinszky, G., et al. (2016) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e16-05-0269 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“Additionally, PARylation is also involved in the recruitment and the regulation of several chromatin-remodeling enzymes whose ATP-dependent activity could promote chromatin relaxation (Chou et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010; Smeenk et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe recognition and removal of cellular poly( ADP ‐ribose) signals
Barkauskaite, E., Jankevicius, G., Ladurner, A. G., Ahel, I., & Timinszky, G. (2013) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12358 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Zhao, Z., Cetin, N. S., Song, C., & Grummt, I. (2018) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.311688.118 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“CHD4 is phosphorylated at multiple sites (Bouazoune and Brehm 2005; Polo et al. 2010; Urquhart et al. 2011).”
Structure and Mechanisms of Lysine Methylation Recognition by the Chromodomain in Gene Transcription
Yap, K. L., & Zhou, M. (2011) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi101885m · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“CHD4 (Mi-2b) Refs (46,108-111) NuRD complex; checkpoint signaling and DNA damage repair; promotes CD4 gene expression during T cell development.”
BackgroundCREBBP and p300 lysine acetyl transferases in the DNA damage response
Dutto, I., Scalera, C., & Prosperi, E. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2717-4 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“In fact, for other important DDR players, the information available indicates that p300/CBP may interact with them, while there is no evidence of their acetylation.”
BackgroundInfluentialCHD3 and CHD4 form distinct NuRD complexes with different yet overlapping functionality
Hoffmeister, H., Fuchs, A., Erdel, F., Pinz, S., Gröbner-Ferreira, R., Bruckmann, A., Deutzmann, R., Schwartz, U., Maldonado, R., Huber, C., et al. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx711 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Pan, M., Hsieh, H.-J., Dai, H., Hung, W.-C., Li, K., Peng, G., & Lin, S. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.287037 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Chromatin regulation: How complex does it get?
Meier, K., & Brehm, A. (2014) · Epigenetics · doi:10.4161/15592294.2014.971580 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A new non‐catalytic role for ubiquitin ligase RNF8 in unfolding higher‐order chromatin structure
Luijsterburg, M. S., Ács, K., Ackermann, L., Wiegant, W. W., Bekker‐Jensen, S., Larsen, D. H., Khanna, K. K., van Attikum, H., Mailand, N., & Dantuma, N. P. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.104 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“Endogenous CHD4 was recruited to laser-generated DSBs marked by phosphorylated histone H2AX ( g H2AX; Figure 6A), in line with several recent reports (Chou et al , 2010; Larsen et al , 2010; Polo et al , 2010; Smeenk et al , 2010).”
InfluentialPatching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks
Gürsoy-Yüzügüllü, Ö., House, N. C. M., & Price, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.021 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The tale of a tail: histone H4 acetylation and the repair of DNA breaks
Dhar, S., Gürsoy-Yüzügüllü, Ö., Parasuram, R., & Price, B. D. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0284 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
McMurchy, A. N., Stempor, P., Gaarenstroom, T., Wysolmerski, B., Yan, D., Ausiannikava, D., Appert, A., Huang, N., Kolasinska-Zwierz, P., Sapetschnig, A., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21666 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Beck, C., Boehler, C., Guirouilh‐Barbat, J., Bonnet, M.-E., Illuzzi, G., Rondé, P., Gauthier, L., Magroun, N., Rajendran, A., López, B. S., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku174 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“The alternative pathway (A-EJ) is initiated by an Mre11-mediated end-resection activity in a manner similar to HR and involves additional proteins such as PARP1, XRCC1, DNA ligase III and histone H1 (14–20).”
BackgroundInfluentialSpruijt, C. G., Luijsterburg, M. S., Menafra, R., Lindeboom, R. G. H., Jansen, P. W. T. C., Edupuganti, R. R., Baltissen, M. P. A., Wiegant, W. W., Voelker-Albert, M., Matarese, F., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.037 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“This could reconcile our results with previous studies and possibly explain how both PAR and ZMYND8 could stimulate the recruitment of CHD4 and MBD2 (Chou et al., 2010; Luijsterburg et al., 2012; Polo et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRegulation of DNA Repair Mechanisms: How the Chromatin Environment Regulates the DNA Damage Response
Stadler, J., & Richly, H. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18081715 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“The chromatin surrounding DSBs is rapidly and transiently PARylated (Figure 2) causing the recruitment of the NuRD complex [72,73], which harbors both ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and histone deacetylase activities.”
BackgroundMetastasis-Associated Protein 1/Nucleosome Remodeling and Histone Deacetylase Complex in Cancer
Li, D., Pakala, S. B., Nair, S. S., Eswaran, J., & Kumar, R. (2012) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2345 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
CHD chromatin remodelers and the transcription cycle
Murawska, M., & Brehm, A. (2011) · Transcription · doi:10.4161/trns.2.6.17840 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
PHF6 Interacts with the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylation (NuRD) Complex
Todd, M. A. M., & Picketts, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr3004369 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
SIRT6 coordinates with CHD4 to promote chromatin relaxation and DNA repair
Hou, T., Cao, Z., Zhang, J., Tang, M., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Lu, X., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Wei, F., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa006 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“We thus proposed that SIRT6 and CHD4 may coordinate their action in DDR.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Cardiac TBX5 Interactome Reveals a Chromatin Remodeling Network Essential for Cardiac Septation
Wasson, L. K., Steimle, J. D., Greco, T. M., Gomez, N. C., Dorr, K. M., Kweon, J., Temple, B. R. S., Yang, X. H., Wilczewski, C. M., Davis, I. J., et al. (2016) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.009 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“GFP tagged full length, C-terminal, and N-terminal human CHD4 constructs were generously provided by Stephen Jackson (Cambridge) (Polo et al., 2010).”
BackgroundCHD4 in the DNA-damage response and cell cycle progression: not so NuRDy now
O’Shaughnessy, A., & Hendrich, B. (2013) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20130027 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in DNA damage response and cancer chemotherapy
Li, M., & Yu, X. (2014) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2014.295 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Nio, K., Yamashita, T., Okada, H., Kondo, M., Hayashi, T., Hara, Y., Nomura, Y., Zeng, S. S., Yoshida, M., Hayashi, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.009 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“Recent studies have shown the importance of CHD4 in response to ionizing radiation and PARP inhibitors [29-32, 38].”
BackgroundNucleosome-CHD4 chromatin remodeler structure maps human disease mutations
Farnung, L., Ochmann, M., & Cramer, P. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56178 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“It is essential for cell cycle progression (Polo et al., 2010), DNA damage response (Larsen et al.”
BackgroundPoly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in regulation of chromatin structure and the DNA damage response
Tallis, M., Morra, R., Barkauskaite, E., & Ahel, I. (2013) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-013-0442-9 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“PARP1 is involved in the early recruitment of theMRN complex to DSBs (Haince et al. 2008) and interacts with cNHEJ components such as WRN (Adelfalk et al. 2003), Ku (Li et al. 2004) and DNAPK (Spagnolo et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrabarz, A., Barascu, A., Guirouilh‐Barbat, J., & López, B. S. (2012) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications
Kim, J. J., Lee, S. Y., & Miller, K. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409238.2019.1620676 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“PARP also promotes the recruitment of the ZMYND8-NuRD chromatin remodeling complex to damaged chromatin where it participates in repressing transcription in the vicinity of DSBs (Chou et al. 2010; Polo et al. 2010; Gong et al. 2015; Spruijt et al. 2016).”
BackgroundNucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair
Seeber, A., Hauer, M., & Gasser, S. M. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.008 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Smith, R., Sellou, H., Chapuis, C., Huet, S., & Timinszky, G. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky334 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Sims, J. K., & Wade, P. A. (2011) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-03-0258 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“3100 | J. K. Sims and P. A. Wade Molecular Biology of the Cell mal chromatin architecture, including the Mi-2/NuRD complex (Sillibourne et al., 2007; Pegoraro et al., 2009; Chou et al., 2010; Cohet et al., 2010; Larsen et al., 2010; Misteli, 2010; Polo et al., 2010; Smeenk et al., 2010).”
InfluentialAwwad, S. W., Abu‐Zhayia, E. R., Guttmann‐Raviv, N., & Ayoub, N. (2017) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201643191 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A Poly-ADP-Ribose Trigger Releases the Auto-Inhibition of a Chromatin Remodeling Oncogene
Singh, H. R., Nardozza, A. P., Möller, I. R., Knobloch, G., Kistemaker, H. A. V., Hassler, M., Harrer, N., Blessing, C., Eustermann, S., Kotthoff, C., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.019 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“Sites of high PARP1 activity in vivo recruit ATP-dependent remodelers, including ALC1 (Amplified in Liver Cancer 1; also known as CHD1L), CHD2, CHD4, SMARCA5/SNF2H and Drosophila Mi-2 (Chou et al., 2010; Murawska et al., 2011; Polo et al., 2010; Smeenk et al., 2013).”
BackgroundDuan, M., & Smerdon, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.540732 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
CTCF facilitates DNA double-strand break repair by enhancing homologous recombination repair
Hilmi, K., Jangal, M., Marques, M., Zhao, T., Saad, A., Zhang, C., Luo, V. M., Syme, A., Rejon, C. A., Yu, Z., et al. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601898 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Ma, C., Wang, F., Han, B., Zhong, X., Si, F., Ye, J., Hsueh, E. C., Robbins, L., Kiefer, S. M., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0824-y · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“of the G1/S cell cycle transition and ATM-associated DNA damage responses [56].”
BackgroundMor, N., Rais, Y., Sheban, D., Peles, S., Aguilera-Castrejon, A., Zviran, A., Elinger, D., Viukov, S., Geula, S., Krupalnik, V., et al. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.07.004 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Zhao, Y. J., Brickner, J. R., Majid, M. C., & Mosammaparast, N. (2014) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.01.005 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Originally identified as a key component of a histone deacetylase complex that promotes transcriptional repression [58], CHD4/NuRD binds directly to poly-ADP-ribose and requires PARP activity for its recruitment to damage sites [55, 56].”
- Authors
- Polo, S. E., Kaidi, A., Baskcomb, L., Galanty, Y., & Jackson, S. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Stephen P
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2010-08-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3130-3139
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC2944064
- OpenAlex
- W2020084014
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Cancer Research UK (11224, A5290, A4361)
- European Commission (512113, 201630, LSHG-CT-2005-512113)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- CHD4, chromatin remodeling, NuRD complex, DNA damage response, cell cycle regulation, G1/S transition, p53 deacetylation, ATM phosphorylation, DNA double-strand break repair, poly(ADP-ribose), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, genome stability, transcriptional repressor
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autoantigens, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Histones, Humans, Phosphorylation, Poly Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Western, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Mice, Knockout, Cell Cycle Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Immunoprecipitation, Mice, Mi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review