Cited by 542Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex

Freedman, David J., Assad, John A.·2006·Nature

Abstract

Categorization is a process by which the brain assigns meaning to sensory stimuli. Through experience, we learn to group stimuli into categories, such as 'chair', 'table' and 'vehicle', which are critical for rapidly and appropriately selecting behavioural responses. Although much is known about the neural representation of simple visual stimulus features (for example, orientation, direction and colour), relatively little is known about how the brain learns and encodes the meaning of stimuli. We trained monkeys to classify 360 degrees of visual motion directions into two discrete categories, and compared neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal (LIP) and middle temporal (MT) areas, two interconnected brain regions known to be involved in visual motion processing. Here we show that neurons in LIP--an area known to be centrally involved in visuo-spatial attention, motor planning and decision-making-robustly reflect the category of motion direction as a result of learning. The activity of LIP neurons encoded directions of motion according to their category membership, and that encoding shifted after the monkeys were retrained to group the same stimuli into two new categories. In contrast, neurons in area MT were strongly direction selective but carried little, if any, explicit category information. This indicates that LIP might be an important nexus for the transformation of visual direction selectivity to more abstract representations that encode the behavioural relevance, or meaning, of stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature05078

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, D. J., & Assad, J. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Freedman, David J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2006-08-27
Volume
443
Issue
7107
Pages
85-88
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1975145078
Cited by
542
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
lateral intraparietal area, middle temporal area, parietal cortex, category learning, direction selectivity, visuospatial attention, neuronal encoding, perceptual categorization
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motion, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review