Cited by 2,450Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchRNA Research and Splicing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers

Open access

Abstract

We used genome-wide sequencing methods to study stimulus-dependent enhancer function in mouse cortical neurons. We identified approximately 12,000 neuronal activity-regulated enhancers that are bound by the general transcriptional co-activator CBP in an activity-dependent manner. A function of CBP at enhancers may be to recruit RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), as we also observed activity-regulated RNAPII binding to thousands of enhancers. Notably, RNAPII at enhancers transcribes bi-directionally a novel class of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) within enhancer domains defined by the presence of histone H3 monomethylated at lysine 4. The level of eRNA expression at neuronal enhancers positively correlates with the level of messenger RNA synthesis at nearby genes, suggesting that eRNA synthesis occurs specifically at enhancers that are actively engaged in promoting mRNA synthesis. These findings reveal that a widespread mechanism of enhancer activation involves RNAPII binding and eRNA synthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09033

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kawashima, T. et al. Synaptic activity-responsive element in the Arc/Arg3.1 promoter essential for synapse-to-nucleus signaling in activated neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 316–321 (2009) · DOI
  2. Robertson, A. G. et al. Genome-wide relationship between histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and tri-methylation and transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 18, 1906–1917 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lin, Y. et al. Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4. Nature 455, 1198–1204 (2008) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,007

Metadata

Authors
Kim, T.-K., Hemberg, M., Gray, J. M., Costa, A. M., Bear, D. M., Wu, J., Harmin, D. A., Laptewicz, M., Barbara-Haley, K., Kuersten, S., Markenscoff-Papadimitriou, E., Kuhl, D., Bito, H., Worley, P. F., Kreiman, G., & Greenberg, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Epicentre (FR)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, Michael E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-04-14
Volume
465
Issue
7295
Pages
182-187
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2014787267
Cited by
2,450
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 167 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 204 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 187 · 2012: 140
FWCI
62.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od006461-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH053608, MH-053608)
  • National Eye Institute (R21EY019710)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS028829, R01NS028829, R37NS028829)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD018655)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
enhancer RNA, CBP, RNA polymerase II, enhancer activation, H3K4 monomethylation, cortical neurons, electrical activity, gene expression regulation, mouse brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Methylation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, RNA Polymerase II, Transcription, Genetic, Consensus Sequence, Genes, fos, Genes, Reporter, RNA, Untranslated, CREB-Binding Protein, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review