Cited by 149Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Deep sleep maintains learning efficiency of the human brain

Open access
Fattinger, Sara, de Beukelaar, Toon T., Ruddy, Kathy L., Volk, Carina, Heyse, Natalie C., Herbst, Joshua A., Hahnloser, Richard H. R., Wenderoth, Nicole +1 more·2017·Nature Communications

Abstract

It is hypothesized that deep sleep is essential for restoring the brain’s capacity to learn efficiently, especially in regions heavily activated during the day. However, causal evidence in humans has been lacking due to the inability to sleep deprive one target area while keeping the natural sleep pattern intact. Here we introduce a novel approach to focally perturb deep sleep in motor cortex, and investigate the consequences on behavioural and neurophysiological markers of neuroplasticity arising from dedicated motor practice. We show that the capacity to undergo neuroplastic changes is reduced by wakefulness but restored during unperturbed sleep. This restorative process is markedly attenuated when slow waves are selectively perturbed in motor cortex, demonstrating that deep sleep is a requirement for maintaining sustainable learning efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms15405

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adopting healthy sleep habits is critical for fostering learning and memory consolidation in both animal and human models.

    “it is well established that adopting healthy sleep habits is critical for fostering learning and memory consolidation in both animal and human models (9, 10).”

    From Nightly sleep duration predicts grade point average in the first year of college (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract reports that unperturbed deep sleep restores the capacity for motor learning in humans, while perturbing slow waves attenuates that effect. The paper does not establish the broader claim about adopting healthy sleep habits, memory consolidation, or animal models; its Results describe a human motor-learning experiment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Carson R. G., Ruddy K. L. & McNickle E. Progress in Motor Control; Theories and Translations (eds Laczko J., Latash M. L. ISBN 978-3-319-47312-3 Springer International Publishing AG.
  2. Keppel G. & Wickens T. D. Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook Prentice Hall (1991).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fattinger, S., de Beukelaar, T. T., Ruddy, K. L., Volk, C., Heyse, N. C., Herbst, J. A., Hahnloser, R. H. R., Wenderoth, N., & Huber, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Wenderoth, Nicole
  • Huber, Reto
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
15405-15405
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618704403
Cited by
148
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (149561, 153387, 320030)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0401.12)
  • Universität Zürich
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
slow-wave sleep, motor learning, neuroplasticity, motor cortex, slow waves, sleep deprivation, motor training, learning efficiency, wakefulness
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Behavior, Brain, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Motor Cortex, Motor Skills, Neuronal Plasticity, Sleep, Wakefulness, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review