Cited by 384Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention

Open access
Asplund, Christopher L, Todd, J Jay, Snyder, Andy P, Marois, René·2010·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Attention is the process that selects which sensory information is preferentially processed and ultimately reaches our awareness. Attention, however, is not a unitary process; it can be captured by unexpected or salient events (stimulus driven) or it can be deployed under voluntary control (goal directed), and these two forms of attention are implemented by largely distinct ventral and dorsal parieto-frontal networks. For coherent behavior and awareness to emerge, stimulus-driven and goal-directed behavior must ultimately interact. We found that the ventral, but not dorsal, network can account for stimulus-driven attentional limits to conscious perception, and that stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention converge in the lateral prefrontal component of that network. Although these results do not rule out dorsal network involvement in awareness when goal-directed task demands are present, they point to a general role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in the control of attention and awareness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2509

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Karnath HO Milner AD Vallar G The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect 2002 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asplund, C. L., Todd, J. J., Snyder, A. P., & Marois, R.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Asplund, Christopher L
  • Marois, René
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2010-03-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
507-512
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2019815181
Cited by
384
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH70776, R01MH070776)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
lateral prefrontal cortex, top-down attention, bottom-up attention, awareness, attentional control
MeSH terms
Attention, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review