Cited by 309Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Cued memory reactivation during sleep influences skill learning

Open access
Antony, James W, Gobel, Eric W, O'Hare, Justin K, Reber, Paul J, Paller, Ken A·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Information acquired during waking can be reactivated during sleep, promoting memory stabilization. After people learned to produce two melodies in time with moving visual symbols, we enhanced relative performance by presenting one melody during an afternoon nap. Electrophysiological signs of memory processing during sleep corroborated the notion that appropriate auditory stimulation that does not disrupt sleep can nevertheless bias memory consolidation in relevant brain circuitry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3152

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When only one of two melodies learned on a piano keyboard was presented again during posttraining SWS, performance on just this reactivated melody was improved at a later retest compared with the nonreactivated melody.

    “When only one of the melodies was presented again during a period of posttraining SWS, performance on just this reactivated melody was improved at a later retest, compared with performance on the nonreactivated melody.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [40]

  • Information flow during coordinated reactivation events appears organized in a loop-like manner, with cortical activity predicting hippocampal reactivations during SPW-Rs, and hippocampal reactivations leading extrahippocampal regions.

    “information flow during such coordinated reactivation events appears be organized in a loop-like manner, with activity in cortical regions predicting the content of hippocampal reactivations during SPW-Rs, 89 and hippocampal reactivations, in turn, leading reactivations in extrahippocampal regions.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

    The paper’s Abstract discusses sleep-cued memory reactivation and spindle activity, and its Online Methods describe scalp EEG recordings. Neither passage addresses cortical activity predicting hippocampal reactivation during SPW-Rs or hippocampal reactivation leading extrahippocampal activity. Searches for both directional relationships found no passage supporting the claimed loop-like information flow. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parallel recordings revealed close temporal coordination of reactivation across hippocampus and cortical/subcortical regions.

    “parallel recordings from both hippocampus and cortical or subcortical regions revealed a close temporal coordination of reactivation across sites 92,100,102”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Online Methods, ‘Sleep Recording’ section (page not provided) describes scalp EEG recordings, not parallel recordings from the hippocampus and cortical or subcortical sites. The copy does not report temporal coordination of reactivation across those sites; searches for parallel recordings and hippocampal–cortical coordination found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antony, J. W., Gobel, E. W., O'Hare, J. K., Reber, P. J., & Paller, K. A.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Paller, Ken A
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1114-1116
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2077366486
Cited by
309
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32ag020418-08)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32-AG020418, T32AG020506)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS047987)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, memory reactivation, motor sequence learning, napping, skill acquisition, memory stabilization
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Cues, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Music, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Sleep, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review