Cited by 20Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Effects of high-protein diets on the cardiometabolic factors and reproductive hormones of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wang, Fang, Dou, Pan, Wei, Wei, Liu, Peng Ju·2024·Nutrition & Diabetes

Abstract

The optimal dietary regimen for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has not been identified. High-protein diets (HPDs) are effective for weight control in individuals with metabolic abnormalities, but no systematic meta-analyses have yet summarised the effects of HPDs on PCOS. Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to 30 April 2023, and studies comparing the effects of HPDs and other diets on the anthropometrics, metabolic factors, and hormonal profiles for PCOS were identified. Data were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool. Eight trials involving 300 women with PCOS were included. Compared with isocaloric balanced diets (BDs), HPDs significantly reduced fasting insulin (−2.69 μIU/mL, 95% CI [−3.81, −1.57], P < 0.0001, I2 = 46%) and homoeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR−0.41, 95% CI [−0.80, −0.02], P = 0.04, I2 = 94%) in women with PCOS. However, HPDs and BDs had comparable effects on weight loss, abdominal adiposity, lipid profiles, and reproductive hormones (all P ≥ 0.05). HPDs may benefit women with PCOS in terms of improving insulin resistance, supporting for their use as one of the dietary management options for PCOS, however further RCTs in larger and broader settings are required to confirm these observations and investigate the mechanism behind it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41387-024-00263-9

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-protein and low-carbohydrate diets improve satiety, preserve muscle mass, and reduce insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism.

    “High-protein and low-carbohydrate diets improve satiety, preserve muscle mass, and reduce insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism [15, 16].”

    From Nutritional and herbal interventions for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a comprehensive review of dietary approaches, macronutrient impact, and herbal medicine in management (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion says high-protein diets can preserve lean mass and increase satiety, and reports improved insulin-resistance measures in women with PCOS. But the Results (Reproductive hormones; page unavailable) found no significant overall reduction in total testosterone or free androgen index versus isocaloric balanced diets. The claim’s assertion that these diets reduce hyperandrogenism is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have proven that a protein-rich diet can, to some extent, be beneficial for PCOS management.

    “Studies have proven that a protein-rich diet can, to some extent, be beneficial for PCOS management [114, 115].”

    From Nutritional and herbal interventions for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a comprehensive review of dietary approaches, macronutrient impact, and herbal medicine in management (2025) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Discussion reports that high-protein diets reduced fasting insulin and insulin resistance more than balanced diets in women with PCOS, supporting a limited management benefit. But the paper calls for further research and notes that the diets had similar effects on weight, lipids, and sex hormones; its findings do not warrant the claim that benefit has been ‘proven.’ (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, F., Dou, P., Wei, W., & Liu, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Peng Ju
Venue
Nutrition & Diabetes
Published
2024-02-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
2044-4052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392298271
Cited by
20
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition and Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, high-protein diet, insulin resistance, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, reproductive hormones, weight loss, abdominal fat, lipid profile, dietary management, women
MeSH terms
Diet, High-Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review