Cited by 435SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19–Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance — VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021–January 2022

Open access
Ferdinands, Jill M., Rao, Suchitra, Dixon, Brian E., Mitchell, Patrick K., DeSilva, Malini B., Irving, Stephanie A., Lewis, Ned, Natarajan, Karthik +39 more·2022·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Persons categorized as having received 3 doses included those who received a third dose in a primary series or a booster dose after a 2 dose primary series (including the reduced-dosage Moderna booster). The VISION Network analyzed 241,204 ED/UC encounters** and 93,408 hospitalizations across 10 states during August 26, 2021-January 22, 2022. VE after receipt of both 2 and 3 doses was lower during the Omicron-predominant than during the Delta-predominant period at all time points evaluated. During both periods, VE after receipt of a third dose was higher than that after a second dose; however, VE waned with increasing time since vaccination. During the Omicron period, VE against ED/UC visits was 87% during the first 2 months after a third dose and decreased to 66% among those vaccinated 4-5 months earlier; VE against hospitalizations was 91% during the first 2 months following a third dose and decreased to 78% ≥4 months after a third dose. For both Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods, VE was generally higher for protection against hospitalizations than against ED/UC visits. All eligible persons should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations to best protect against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and ED/UC visits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferdinands, J. M., Rao, S., Dixon, B. E., Mitchell, P. K., DeSilva, M. B., Irving, S. A., Lewis, N., Natarajan, K., Stenehjem, E., Grannis, S. J., Han, J., McEvoy, C., Ong, T. C., Naleway, A. L., Reese, S. E., Embi, P. J., Dascomb, K., Klein, N. P., Griggs, E. P., Konatham, D., Kharbanda, A. B., Yang, D.-H., Fadel, W. F., Grisel, N., Goddard, K., Patel, P., Liao, I.-C., Birch, R., Valvi, N. R., Reynolds, S., Arndorfer, J., Zerbo, O., Dickerson, M., Murthy, K., Williams, J., Bozio, C. H., Blanton, L., Verani, J. R., Schrag, S. J., Dalton, A. F., Wondimu, M. H., Link-Gelles, R., Azziz-Baumgartner, E., Barron, M. A., Gaglani, M., Thompson, M. G., & Fireman, B.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ferdinands, Jill M.
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2022-02-18
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
255-263
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W4211242522
Cited by
435
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 194
FWCI
51.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, mRNA vaccines, vaccine effectiveness, waning immunity, booster vaccination, Omicron variant, Delta variant, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, hospitalization, adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, United States, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review