Cited by 92Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Reward-Guided Learning with and without Causal Attribution

Open access
Jocham, Gerhard, Brodersen, Kay H., Constantinescu, Alexandra O., Kahn, Martin C., Ianni, Angela M., Walton, Mark E., Rushworth, Matthew F.S., Behrens, Timothy E.J.·2016·Neuron

Abstract

When an organism receives a reward, it is crucial to know which of many candidate actions caused this reward. However, recent work suggests that learning is possible even when this most fundamental assumption is not met. We used novel reward-guided learning paradigms in two fMRI studies to show that humans deploy separable learning mechanisms that operate in parallel. While behavior was dominated by precise contingent learning, it also revealed hallmarks of noncontingent learning strategies. These learning mechanisms were separable behaviorally and neurally. Lateral orbitofrontal cortex supported contingent learning and reflected contingencies between outcomes and their causal choices. Amygdala responses around reward times related to statistical patterns of learning. Time-based heuristic mechanisms were related to activity in sensorimotor corticostriatal circuitry. Our data point to the existence of several learning mechanisms in the human brain, of which only one relies on applying known rules about the causal structure of the task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.018

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Area 47/12o has been linked to the process of assigning the credit for a specific outcome to a specific choice.

    “It has been linked to the process of assigning the credit for a specific outcome to a specific choice.27”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion links lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) activity to correctly assigning credit for contingent rewards, and the Results report lOFC responses aligned with choice–outcome contingencies. Our copy does not identify that region specifically as area 47/12o, so the claim’s anatomical specificity is not established. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jocham, G., Brodersen, K. H., Constantinescu, A. O., Kahn, M. C., Ianni, A. M., Walton, M. E., Rushworth, M. F. S., & Behrens, T. E. J.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Jocham, Gerhard
  • Brodersen, Kay H.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
177-190
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294594699
Cited by
92
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104765/Z/14/Z, WT088312AIA, WT090051MA, WT104765MA, 099715/Z/12/Z, 100973/Z/13/Z)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (1501067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
causal attribution, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, corticostriatal circuits, statistical learning, causal structure
MeSH terms
Heuristics, Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mesencephalon, Neural Pathways, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review