Cited by 55Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Causal manipulation of self-other mergence in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex

Open access
Wittmann, Marco K., Trudel, Nadescha, Trier, Hailey A., Klein-Flügge, Miriam C., Sel, Alejandra, Verhagen, Lennart, Rushworth, Matthew F.S.·2021·Neuron

Abstract

To navigate social environments, people must simultaneously hold representations about their own and others' abilities. During self-other mergence, people estimate others' abilities not only on the basis of the others' past performance, but the estimates are also influenced by their own performance. For example, if we perform well, we overestimate the abilities of those with whom we are co-operating and underestimate competitors. Self-other mergence is associated with specific activity patterns in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Using a combination of non-invasive brain stimulation, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and computational modeling, we show that dmPFC neurostimulation silences these neural signatures of self-other mergence in relation to estimation of others' abilities. In consequence, self-other mergence behavior increases, and our assessments of our own performance are projected increasingly onto other people. This suggests an inherent tendency to form interdependent social representations and a causal role of the dmPFC in separating self and other representations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.027

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vertex site (MNI: x = 0, y = -34, z = 72) served as a non-active control site, based on previous studies.

    “The vertex site (MNI: x = 0, y = -34, z = 72), which served as a non-active control site, was based on previous studies.”
  • In previous studies, dmPFC has been linked to confidence and the sense of agency.

    “In previous studies, dmPFC has been linked to confidence and the sense of agency.7”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction and Discussion link dmPFC to estimates of one’s own and others’ abilities and to maintaining a calibrated sense of self. They do not address confidence or the sense of agency as such; searches for both terms found no passage establishing the claimed links. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-other mergence is associated with differences in activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and disrupting this area using transcranial magnetic stimulation leads to greater self-other mergence.

    “This intertwining of models of self-and other-performance was associated with differences in activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and disrupting this area using transcranial magnetic simulation (TMS) led to greater self-other mergence (Wittmann et al. 2021)”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Wittmann et al. 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittmann, M. K., Trudel, N., Trier, H. A., Klein-Flügge, M. C., Sel, A., Verhagen, L., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Wittmann, Marco K.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
109
Issue
14
Pages
2353-2361.e11
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176565698
Cited by
55
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação Bial (44/16)
  • Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z, 103184/Z/13/Z, WT100973AIA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, non-invasive brain stimulation, social representations, self-other distinction, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review