Cited by 532Treatment of Major DepressionSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Single-nucleus transcriptomics of the prefrontal cortex in major depressive disorder implicates oligodendrocyte precursor cells and excitatory neurons

Open access
Nagy, Corina, Maitra, Malosree, Tanti, Arnaud, Suderman, Matthew, Théroux, Jean-Francois, Davoli, Maria Antonietta, Perlman, Kelly, Yerko, Volodymyr +6 more·2020·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has an enormous impact on global disease burden, affecting millions of people worldwide and ranking as a leading cause of disability for almost three decades. Past molecular studies of MDD employed bulk homogenates of postmortem brain tissue, which obscures gene expression changes within individual cell types. Here we used single-nucleus transcriptomics to examine ~80,000 nuclei from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of male individuals with MDD (n = 17) and of healthy controls (n = 17). We identified 26 cellular clusters, and over 60% of these showed differential gene expression between groups. We found that the greatest dysregulation occurred in deep layer excitatory neurons and immature oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), and these contributed almost half (47%) of all changes in gene expression. These results highlight the importance of dissecting cell-type-specific contributions to the disease and offer opportunities to identify new avenues of research and novel targets for treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-020-0621-y

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the compendium, fourteen studies had control groups that included six or more samples.

    “Within our compendium, we identified a total of fourteen studies with control groups that included six or more samples5,6,15,49–59.”
  • Substantial evidence of preservation was found across all modules except INH-M1 in an snRNA-seq dataset of the PFC from donors with major depressive disorder and controls.

    “Finally, we tested for the preservation of these modules in 19,425 inhibitory neurons from an snRNA-seq dataset of the PFC from donors with major depressive disorder (MDD) and controls45 (34 samples), and we found substantial evidence of preservation across all modules except INH-M1 (Figures S10C–S10E).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nature Biotechnology 36, 411 (2018).
  2. Trapnell, C., et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nature Biotechnology 32, 381 (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagy, C., Maitra, M., Tanti, A., Suderman, M., Théroux, J.-F., Davoli, M. A., Perlman, K., Yerko, V., Wang, Y. C., Tripathy, S. J., Pavlidis, P., Mechawar, N., Ragoussis, J., & Turecki, G.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Turecki, Gustavo
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
771-781
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W3020538763
Cited by
532
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
35.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN148374, EGM141899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
major depressive disorder, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, single-nucleus transcriptomics, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, cell type-specific gene expression, synaptic plasticity, immune function, steroid hormones, postmortem brain
MeSH terms
Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Gene Regulatory Networks, Young Adult, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review