Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

CDH6 and HAGH protein levels in plasma associate with Alzheimer’s disease in APOE ε4 carriers

Open access
Ahmad, Shahzad, Milan, Marta del Campo, Hansson, Oskar, Demirkan, Ayse, Agustin, Ruiz, Sáez, Maria E., Giagtzoglou, Nikolaos, Cabrera-Socorro, Alfredo +12 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Many Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genes including Apolipoprotein E (APOE) are found to be expressed in blood-derived macrophages and thus may alter blood protein levels. We measured 91 neuro-proteins in plasma from 316 participants of the Rotterdam Study (incident AD = 161) using Proximity Extension Ligation assay. We studied the association of plasma proteins with AD in the overall sample and stratified by APOE. Findings from the Rotterdam study were replicated in 186 AD patients of the BioFINDER study. We further evaluated the correlation of these protein biomarkers with total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and amyloid-beta (Aβ) 42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (N = 441). Finally, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify the genetic variants determining the blood levels of AD-associated proteins. Plasma levels of the proteins, CDH6 (β = 0.638, P = 3.33 × 10−4) and HAGH (β = 0.481, P = 7.20 × 10−4), were significantly elevated in APOE ε4 carrier AD patients. The findings in the Rotterdam Study were replicated in the BioFINDER study for both CDH6 (β = 1.365, P = 3.97 × 10−3) and HAGH proteins (β = 0.506, P = 9.31 × 10−7) when comparing cases and controls in APOE ε4 carriers. In the CSF, CDH6 levels were positively correlated with t-tau and p-tau in the total sample as well as in APOE ε4 stratum (P < 1 × 10−3). The HAGH protein was not detected in CSF. GWAS of plasma CDH6 protein levels showed significant association with a cis-regulatory locus (rs111283466, P = 1.92 × 10−9). CDH6 protein is implicated in cell adhesion and synaptogenesis while HAGH protein is related to the oxidative stress pathway. Our findings suggest that these pathways may be altered during presymptomatic AD and that CDH6 and HAGH may be new blood-based biomarkers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-65038-5

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APOE isoforms differentially modulate components of cadherin-catenin complexes.

    “Cadherin signaling has also been linked to synaptic adhesion stability and neurodegeneration (Ando et al., 2011; Arikkath and Reichardt, 2008; Laszlo and Lele, 2022; Mysore et al., 2008), and APOE isoforms differentially modulate components of cadherin–catenin complexes (Ahmad et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2024).”

    From Isogenic human stem cell models reveal mutation-dependent protective mechanisms of APOE3 Christchurch (2026) · cites this paper as Ahmad et al., 2020

    The Results (‘Association of proteins with APOE’; page unavailable) report different plasma levels of CDH6, a cadherin, across APOE genotype groups. The paper does not show that APOE isoforms modulate cadherin–catenin complexes or their components beyond CDH6, and the observed association does not establish modulation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. [1]Au R Piers RJ Lancashire L Back to the future: Alzheimer’s disease heterogeneity revisited Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2015 1 368 370 27077132 PMC4827150
  2. [2]Corder EH Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families Science 1993 261 921 3 10.1126/science.8346443 8346443 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Seshadri S Drachman DA Lippa CF Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele and the lifetime risk of Alzheimer’s disease. What physicians know, and what they should know Arch Neurol 1995 52 1074 9 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540350068018 7487559 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]van der Lee SJ The effect of APOE and other common genetic variants on the onset of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: a community-based cohort study Lancet Neurol 2018 17 434 444 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30053-X 29555425 · DOI
  5. [7]Sunderland T Cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid1-42 and tau in control subjects at risk for Alzheimer’s disease: the effect of APOE epsilon4 allele Biol Psychiatry 2004 56 670 6 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.021 15522251 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]de la Torre JC Is Alzheimer’s disease a neurodegenerative or a vascular disorder? Data, dogma, and dialectics Lancet Neurol 2004 3 184 90 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00683-0 14980533 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [9]Larsson SC Modifiable pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis BMJ 2017 359 j5375 10.1136/bmj.j5375 29212772 PMC5717765 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Henstridge, C.M., Hyman, B.T. & Spires-Jones, T.L. Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1 (2019). PMC6545070 30643230
  9. [11]Kunkle BW Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Abeta, tau, immunity and lipid processing Nat Genet 2019 51 414 430 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 30820047 PMC6463297 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Zlokovic BV Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011 12 723 10.1038/nrn3114 22048062 PMC4036520 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Katusic ZS Austin SA Endothelial nitric oxide: protector of a healthy mind European heart journal 2013 35 888 894 10.1093/eurheartj/eht544 24357508 PMC3977136 · DOI
  12. [15]Koizumi K Wang G Park L Endothelial dysfunction and amyloid-β-induced neurovascular alterations Cellular and molecular neurobiology 2016 36 155 165 10.1007/s10571-015-0256-9 26328781 PMC4775455 · DOI
  13. [18]Park L Brain Perivascular Macrophages Initiate the Neurovascular Dysfunction of Alzheimer Abeta Peptides Circ Res 2017 121 258 269 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311054 28515043 PMC5522360 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [19]Hye A Proteome-based plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease Brain 2006 129 3042 50 10.1093/brain/awl279 17071923 · DOI
  15. [20]Ray S Classification and prediction of clinical Alzheimer’s diagnosis based on plasma signaling proteins Nature medicine 2007 13 1359 10.1038/nm1653 17934472 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [21]Soares HD Plasma biomarkers associated with the apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease Archives of neurology 2012 69 1310 1317 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1070 22801723 PMC3683865 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [22]Ringman JM Plasma signaling proteins in persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease: influence of APOE genotype Archives of neurology 2012 69 757 764 22689192 PMC3668092
  18. [23]Hu WT Plasma multianalyte profiling in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease Neurology 2012 79 897 905 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318266fa70 22855860 PMC3425844 · DOI
  19. [24]Llano DA Devanarayan V Simon AJ Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I Evaluation of plasma proteomic data for Alzheimer disease state classification and for the prediction of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 2013 27 233 243 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31826d597a 23023094 · DOI
  20. [26]Blankenburg M Haberland L Elvers HD Tannert C Jandrig B High-Throughput Omics Technologies: Potential Tools for the Investigation of Influences of EMF on Biological Systems Curr Genomics 2009 10 86 92 10.2174/138920209787847050 19794880 PMC2699823 · DOI
  21. [28]Phizicky E Bastiaens PI Zhu H Snyder M Fields S Protein analysis on a proteomic scale Nature 2003 422 208 15 10.1038/nature01512 12634794 · DOI
  22. [29]Emilsson V Co-regulatory networks of human serum proteins link genetics to disease Science 2018 361 769 773 10.1126/science.aaq1327 30072576 PMC6190714 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [30]Sun BB Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome Nature 2018 558 73 79 10.1038/s41586-018-0175-2 29875488 PMC6697541 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [32]Zhao B Genome-wide association analysis of 19,629 individuals identifies variants influencing regional brain volumes and refines their genetic co-architecture with cognitive and mental health traits Nature genetics 2019 51 1637 1644 10.1038/s41588-019-0516-6 31676860 PMC6858580 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [33]Harper L Patterns of atrophy in pathologically confirmed dementias: a voxelwise analysis Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2017 88 908 916 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314978 PMC5740544 28473626 · DOI
  26. [35]Hesse C Transient increase in total tau but not phospho-tau in human cerebrospinal fluid after acute stroke Neuroscience letters 2001 297 187 190 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01697-9 11137759 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [36]Lv J Quantitative proteomics reveals that PEA15 regulates astroglial Abeta phagocytosis in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model J Proteomics 2014 110 45 58 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.028 25108202 · DOI
  28. [37]Ye L Abeta seeding potency peaks in the early stages of cerebral beta-amyloidosis EMBO Rep 2017 18 1536 1544 10.15252/embr.201744067 28701326 PMC5579388 · DOI
  29. [38]Asada‐Utsugi M N‐cadherin enhances APP dimerization at the extracellular domain and modulates Aβ production Journal of neurochemistry 2011 119 354 363 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07364.x 21699541 PMC3395082 · DOI
  30. [39]Henriques AG Altered protein phosphorylation as a resource for potential AD biomarkers Sci Rep 2016 6 30319 10.1038/srep30319 27466139 PMC4964585 · DOI
  31. [40]Gul IS Hulpiau P Saeys Y van Roy F Evolution and diversity of cadherins and catenins Exp Cell Res 2017 358 3 9 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.001 28268172 · DOI
  32. [41]Fannon AM Colman DR A model for central synaptic junctional complex formation based on the differential adhesive specificities of the cadherins Neuron 1996 17 423 34 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80175-0 8816706 · DOI
  33. [42]Obst-Pernberg K Redies C Cadherins and synaptic specificity J Neurosci Res 1999 58 130 8 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19991001)58:1<130::AID-JNR13>3.0.CO;2-8 10491578 · DOI
  34. [43]Yamagata M Duan X Sanes JR Cadherins Interact With Synaptic Organizers to Promote Synaptic Differentiation Front Mol Neurosci 2018 11 142 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00142 29760652 PMC5936767 · DOI
  35. [44]Arikkath J Reichardt LF Cadherins and catenins at synapses: roles in synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity Trends Neurosci 2008 31 487 94 10.1016/j.tins.2008.07.001 18684518 PMC2623250 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [45]Sancisi V Cadherin 6 is a new RUNX2 target in TGF-beta signalling pathway PLoS One 2013 8 e75489 10.1371/journal.pone.0075489 24069422 PMC3772092 · DOI
  37. [46]Clay MR Halloran MC Cadherin 6 promotes neural crest cell detachment via F-actin regulation and influences active Rho distribution during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition Development 2014 141 2506 15 10.1242/dev.105551 24917505 PMC4050695 · DOI
  38. [48]Inoue T Tanaka T Suzuki SC Takeichi M Cadherin-6 in the developing mouse brain: expression along restricted connection systems and synaptic localization suggest a potential role in neuronal circuitry Dev Dyn 1998 211 338 51 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199804)211:4<338::AID-AJA5>3.0.CO;2-I 9566953 · DOI
  39. [49]Kuhn, P.H. et al. Systematic substrate identification indicates a central role for the metalloprotease ADAM10 in axon targeting and synapse function. Elife5 (2016). PMC4786429 26802628
  40. [50]Malinverno M Synaptic localization and activity of ADAM10 regulate excitatory synapses through N-cadherin cleavage Journal of Neuroscience 2010 30 16343 16355 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1984-10.2010 21123580 PMC6634827 · DOI
  41. [51]Marambaud P A CBP binding transcriptional repressor produced by the PS1/ϵ-cleavage of N-cadherin is inhibited by PS1 FAD mutations Cell 2003 114 635 645 10.1016/j.cell.2003.08.008 13678586 · DOI
  42. [52]Andreyeva A C-terminal fragment of N-cadherin accelerates synapse destabilization by amyloid-beta Brain 2012 135 2140 54 10.1093/brain/aws120 22637581 · DOI
  43. [53]Hu NW Extracellular Forms of Abeta and Tau from iPSC Models of Alzheimer’s Disease Disrupt Synaptic Plasticity Cell Rep 2018 23 1932 1938 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.040 29768194 PMC5972225 · DOI
  44. [54]Togashi H Cadherin regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis Neuron 2002 35 77 89 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00748-1 12123610 · DOI
  45. [55]Chen F Role for glyoxalase I in Alzheimer’s disease Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 7687 92 10.1073/pnas.0402338101 15128939 PMC419667 · DOI
  46. [56]Thornalley PJ The glyoxalase system: new developments towards functional characterization of a metabolic pathway fundamental to biological life Biochem J 1990 269 1 11 10.1042/bj2690001 2198020 PMC1131522 · DOI
  47. [57]Xu Y Chen X Glyoxalase II, a detoxifying enzyme of glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal and a target of p63 and p73, is a pro-survival factor of the p53 family J Biol Chem 2006 281 26702 13 10.1074/jbc.M604758200 16831876 · DOI
  48. [58]Desai KM Oxidative stress and aging: is methylglyoxal the hidden enemy? Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2010 88 273 84 10.1139/Y10-001 20393592 · DOI
  49. [59]Takeuchi M Involvement of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in Alzheimer’s disease Curr Alzheimer Res 2004 1 39 46 10.2174/1567205043480582 15975084 · DOI
  50. [60]Ko SY Lin YP Lin YS Chang SS Advanced glycation end products enhance amyloid precursor protein expression by inducing reactive oxygen species Free Radic Biol Med 2010 49 474 80 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.005 20471471 · DOI
  51. [61]Wang JZ Wang ZH Tian Q Tau hyperphosphorylation induces apoptotic escape and triggers neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease Neurosci Bull 2014 30 359 66 10.1007/s12264-013-1415-y 24627329 PMC5562660 · DOI
  52. [62]More SS Vartak AP Vince R Restoration of glyoxalase enzyme activity precludes cognitive dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease ACS Chem Neurosci 2013 4 330 8 10.1021/cn3001679 23421684 PMC3582295 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [64]Shea TB Rogers E Ashline D Ortiz D Sheu MS Apolipoprotein E deficiency promotes increased oxidative stress and compensatory increases in antioxidants in brain tissue Free Radic Biol Med 2002 33 1115 20 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01001-8 12374623 · DOI
  54. [65]Baldeiras I Peripheral oxidative damage in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease J Alzheimers Dis 2008 15 117 28 10.3233/JAD-2008-15110 18780972 · DOI
  55. [67]Hofman A The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update Eur J Epidemiol 2015 30 661 708 10.1007/s10654-015-0082-x 26386597 PMC4579264 · DOI
  56. [68]Folstein MF Folstein SE McHugh PR Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 189 98 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 1202204 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [69]Copeland JR A semi-structured clinical interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly: the Geriatric Mental State Schedule. I. Development and reliability Psychol Med 1976 6 439 49 10.1017/S0033291700015889 996204 · DOI
  58. [70]Roth M CAMDEX. A standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia Br J Psychiatry 1986 149 698 709 10.1192/bjp.149.6.698 3790869 · DOI · Paper page
  59. [71]McKhann G Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease Neurology 1984 34 939 44 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 6610841 · DOI · Paper page
  60. [73]Brann E Inflammatory markers in late pregnancy in association with postpartum depression-A nested case-control study Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017 79 146 159 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.029 28285186 · DOI
  61. [74]Slooter AJ Apolipoprotein E genotype and progression of Alzheimer’s disease: the Rotterdam Study J Neurol 1999 246 304 8 10.1007/s004150050351 10367700 · DOI
  62. [76]Roshchupkin GV Fine-mapping the effects of Alzheimer’s disease risk loci on brain morphology Neurobiol Aging 2016 48 204 211 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.024 27718423 · DOI
  63. [77]McCarthy S A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation Nat Genet 2016 48 1279 83 10.1038/ng.3643 27548312 PMC5388176 · DOI · Paper page
  64. [78]Das S Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods Nat Genet 2016 48 1284 7 10.1038/ng.3656 27571263 PMC5157836 · DOI · Paper page
  65. [79]Delaneau O Marchini J Genomes Project, C. & Genomes Project, C. Integrating sequence and array data to create an improved 1000 Genomes Project haplotype reference panel Nat Commun 2014 5 3934 10.1038/ncomms4934 25653097 PMC4338501 · DOI
  66. [82]van der Flier WM Scheltens P Amsterdam Dementia Cohort: Performing Research to Optimize Care J Alzheimers Dis 2018 62 1091 1111 10.3233/JAD-170850 29562540 PMC5870023 · DOI
  67. [83]van der Flier WM Optimizing patient care and research: the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort Journal of Alzheimer’s disease 2014 41 313 327 10.3233/JAD-132306 24614907 · DOI
  68. [84]Reijs BLR The Central Biobank and Virtual Biobank of BIOMARKAPD: a resource for studies on neurodegenerative diseases Frontiers in neurology 2015 6 216 10.3389/fneur.2015.00216 26528237 PMC4606063 · DOI
  69. [85]Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300 (1995).
  70. [86]Zhan X Hu Y Li B Abecasis GR Liu DJ RVTESTS: an efficient and comprehensive tool for rare variant association analysis using sequence data Bioinformatics 2016 32 1423 6 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw079 27153000 PMC4848408 · DOI
  71. [87]Watanabe K Taskesen E van Bochoven A Posthuma D Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA Nat Commun 2017 8 1826 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5 29184056 PMC5705698 · DOI · Paper page
  72. [88]Consortium GT The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project Nat Genet 2013 45 580 5 10.1038/ng.2653 23715323 PMC4010069 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, S., Milan, M. D. C., Hansson, O., Demirkan, A., Agustin, R., Sáez, M. E., Giagtzoglou, N., Cabrera-Socorro, A., Bakker, M. H. M., Ramirez, A., Hankemeier, T., Stomrud, E., Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Scheltens, P., van der Flier, W. M., Ikram, M. A., Malarstig, A., Teunissen, C. E., Amin, N., & van Duijn, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • AbbVie (Germany) (DE)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Shahzad
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-05-19
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
8233-8233
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026116304
Cited by
31
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Weston Brain Institute
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (115975)
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 115975, 014-93-015)
  • ZonMw (733051021, 050-060-810)
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum (050-060-810, 014-93-015)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (050.060.810, 014-93-015, 911-03-012, 175.010.200, 175.010.2005.011)
  • Stichting Dioraphte
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (115975)
  • Alzheimer Nederland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, CDH6, APOE ε4 carriers, plasma biomarkers, blood-based biomarkers, neuroproteins, total tau, phosphorylated tau, amyloid-beta 42, cerebrospinal fluid, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, oxidative stress, cell adhesion, synaptogenesis, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Hydroxyacylglutathione Hydrolase, Alzheimer Disease, Genetic Carrier Screening, Humans, Thiolester Hydrolases, Biomarkers, Cadherins, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review