Cited by 739Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionLiver physiology and pathology3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Characterization of primary human hepatocyte spheroids as a model system for drug-induced liver injury, liver function and disease

Open access
Bell, Catherine C., Hendriks, Delilah F. G., Moro, Sabrina M. L., Ellis, Ewa, Walsh, Joanne, Renblom, Anna, Fredriksson Puigvert, Lisa, Dankers, Anita C. A. +11 more·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Liver biology and function, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and liver diseases are difficult to study using current in vitro models such as primary human hepatocyte (PHH) monolayer cultures, as their rapid de-differentiation restricts their usefulness substantially. Thus, we have developed and extensively characterized an easily scalable 3D PHH spheroid system in chemically-defined, serum-free conditions. Using whole proteome analyses, we found that PHH spheroids cultured this way were similar to the liver in vivo and even retained their inter-individual variability. Furthermore, PHH spheroids remained phenotypically stable and retained morphology, viability, and hepatocyte-specific functions for culture periods of at least 5 weeks. We show that under chronic exposure, the sensitivity of the hepatocytes drastically increased and toxicity of a set of hepatotoxins was detected at clinically relevant concentrations. An interesting example was the chronic toxicity of fialuridine for which hepatotoxicity was mimicked after repeated-dosing in the PHH spheroid model, not possible to detect using previous in vitro systems. Additionally, we provide proof-of-principle that PHH spheroids can reflect liver pathologies such as cholestasis, steatosis and viral hepatitis. Combined, our results demonstrate that the PHH spheroid system presented here constitutes a versatile and promising in vitro system to study liver function, liver diseases, drug targets and long-term DILI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep25187

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary cells maintain essential tissue-level interactions, structural organization, and functional stability, critical for modeling drug penetration, systemic toxicity, and tissue-specific response.

    “Furthermore, primary cells maintain essential tissue-level interactions, structural organization, and functional stability, which are critical for modeling drug penetration, systemic toxicity, and tissue-specific response (Bell et al. 2016).”

    From Primary cell cultures versus immortalized cell lines: critical comparative insights into biological fidelity and translational applications (2026) · cites this paper as Bell et al. 2016

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that 3D primary human hepatocyte spheroids recapitulate aspects of liver structure and maintain liver-specific functions; the Results show their use in studying drug-induced liver injury. The claim extends those findings to primary cells generally. The passages do not establish that the model captures drug penetration or systemic toxicity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple comparative studies indicate that spheroid cultures sustain elevated liver-specific functions such as albumin secretion, urea production, and drug-metabolizing enzyme activity, while demonstrating enhanced sensitivity to hepatotoxic compounds and a longer lifespan.

    “Multiple comparative studies indicate that spheroid cultures sustain elevated liver-specific functions, such as albumin secretion, urea production, and drug-metabolizing enzyme activity, while simultaneously demonstrating enhanced sensitivity to hepatotoxic compounds and a longer lifespan [26,27].”

    From The Hepatocyte Expansion Paradox: A Review of In Vitro Challenges and Advances (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid hepatic cultures have emerged as promising tools to assess mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, as they demonstrate enhanced liver phenotype, metabolic activity, and stability in culture not attainable with conventional two-dimensional hepatic models.

    “Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid hepatic cultures have emerged as promising tools to assess mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, as they demonstrate enhanced liver phenotype, metabolic activity, and stability in culture not attainable with conventional two-dimensional hepatic models.”
  • Increased sensitivity of these models to drug-induced cytotoxicity has been demonstrated with relatively small panels of hepatotoxicants.

    “Increased sensitivity of these models to drug-induced cytotoxicity has been demonstrated with relatively small panels of hepatotoxicants.”
  • Prolonged drug exposure of up to 28 days resulted in increased sensitivity for detection of DILI compounds amiodarone, bosentan, diclofenac, fialuridine, and tolcapone.

    “These data are in agreement with the findings of Bell et al. (2016) who noted prolonged drug exposure of up to 28 days resulted in increased sensitivity for detection of DILI compounds amiodarone, bosentan, diclofenac, fialuridine, and tolcapone (Bell et al. 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bell, C. C., Hendriks, D. F. G., Moro, S. M. L., Ellis, E., Walsh, J., Renblom, A., Fredriksson Puigvert, L., Dankers, A. C. A., Jacobs, F., Snoeys, J., Sison-Young, R. L., Jenkins, R. E., Nordling, Å., Mkrtchian, S., Park, B. K., Kitteringham, N. R., Goldring, C. E. P., Lauschke, V. M., & Ingelman-Sundberg, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-05-04
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
25187-25187
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2345415005
Cited by
739
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 15
FWCI
95.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (115336)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Technische Universität München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
primary human hepatocytes, hepatocyte spheroids, drug-induced liver injury, 3D cell culture, serum-free culture, hepatotoxicity, FIAU, chronic toxicity, cholestasis, steatosis, viral hepatitis, liver disease modeling, proteomics, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Arabinofuranosyluracil, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Models, Biological, Spheroids, Cellular, Proteome, Hepatocytes, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review