Cited by 261Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

A cognitive remediation programme for adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Stevenson, Caroline S, Whitmont, Stephanie, Bornholt, Laurel, Livesey, David, Stevenson, Richard J·2002·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is the first systematic examination of the efficacy of a cognitive remediation programme (CRP) for management of adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The CRP was designed to target problems commonly associated with adult ADHD, namely, attention problems, poor motivation, poor organizational skills, impulsivity, reduced anger control and low self-esteem. METHOD: In a randomized, controlled trial, a representative sample of adults with ADHD (some medicated, some not) were assigned to either a CRP (n = 22) or a waiting list control (n = 21). The CRP was delivered in an intensive format with eight two-hour, weekly sessions with support people who acted as coaches, and participant workbooks with homework exercises. RESULTS: Participants who completed the CRP reported reduced ADHD symptomatology (effect size (d) = 1.4), improved organizational skills (d = 1.2) and reduced levels of anger (d = 0.5). Clinically significant improvements in ADHD symptomatology (d = 1.4) and organizational skills (d = 1.3) were maintained one year after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the CRP provides a practical way of enhancing daily functioning for adults with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01052.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, C. S., Whitmont, S., Bornholt, L., Livesey, D., & Stevenson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-10
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
610-616
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2171546569
Cited by
261
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
adult ADHD, attention deficits, organizational skills, anger management, impulsivity, motivation, self-esteem, coaching, homework exercises, treatment efficacy, symptom maintenance
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Socialization, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review