Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Multidimensional Measure of Fatigue for Use with Cancer Patients

Stein, Kevin D., Martin, Staci C., Hann, Danette M., Jacobsen, Paul B.·1998·Cancer Practice
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.006003143.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

purpose : The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a multidimensional measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients. description of study : Items for the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (MFSI) were generated through literature review, discussion with healthcare providers,and a survey of currently available measures of fatigue. The 83‐item MFSI was designed to assess global, somatic, affective, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms of fatigue. The instrument was administered on three occasions to 275 women who had received or were undergoing treatment for breast cancer and 70 women with no history of cancer. Reliability, validity, and factorialstructure of the MFSI were analyzed. results : The factor analysis produced five empirically derived scales that correspond generally to the five rationally derived scales. Reliability of the rationally and empirically derived scales was excellent (alpha coefficients .87 to .96). Estimates of test‐retest reliability were also favorable. Other results support the validity of both the rationally and empirically derived scales. The MFSI appears to be sensitive to fatigue, accurately discriminating cancer patients from control subjects and between patients with varying levels of performance status. clinical implications : The MFSI may be useful in identifying patterns of fatigue within individual patients and across treatment modalities. Such specificity may allow the clinician to develop, implement, and evaluate interventions that are targeted for differing patterns of fatigue. Because the measure is keyed to a 1‐week time frame, it may be useful during the course of cancer treatment. The MFSI appears to be a valid and reliable tool to assess the full spectrum of symptoms that characterize the construct of fatigue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.006003143.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Winningham ML, 1994, Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of knowledge., Oncol Nurs Forum, 21, 23
  2. JamarSC.Fatigue in women receiving chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. In: Funk S et al eds.Key Aspects of Comfort: Management of Pain and Nausea. Philadelphia: Springer;1989:224228. · DOI
  3. 10.1002/1097-0142(19890201)63:3<604::AID-CNCR2820630334>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/bjc.1996.42 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/00002820-199410000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/BF01681961 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90106-R · DOI
  8. Christensen T, 1987, Fatigue and muscle amino acids during surgical convalescence., Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, 153, 567
  9. 10.1002/bjs.1800770536 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00000542-199103000-00005 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/00140137308924554 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00012272-199203000-00007 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00002820-199304000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Christensen T, 1989, Fatigue and cardiac and endocrine metabolic response to exercise after abdominal surgery., Surgery, 105, 46
  15. 10.1097/00002820-198806000-00009 · DOI
  16. 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.5.678 · DOI
  17. Morrow GR, 1992, Chemotherapy‐induced fatigue and patient‐reported psychological depression (Meeting abstract)., Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 11, 1329
  18. 10.1192/bjp.153.1.1 · DOI
  19. RhotenD.Fatigue and the post‐surgical patient. In: Norris CM ed.Concept Clarification in Nursing. Rockville Md: Aspen Publishers Inc.;1982:277300.
  20. 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520280085020 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90027-M · DOI · Paper page
  23. PearsonPG&ByarsGE.The development and validation of a checklist measuring subjective fatigue (report no. 56‐115). School of Aviation. USAF Randolf AFB Tex 1956. · DOI
  24. 10.1097/00002820-197912000-00005 · DOI
  25. PiperB LindseyA DoddM FerketichS PaulS WellerS.Development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S Tournquist E Champagne M Copp L Weise R eds.Key Aspects of Comfort: Management of Pain Fatigue and Nausea. New York: Springer;1989:199208.
  26. PiperB.Fatigue. In: Carrieri V Lindsey A West C eds.Pathophysiological Phenomena in Nursing: Human Responses to Illness(2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders;1993:279302.
  27. Kogi K, 1970, Validity of three components of subjective fatigue feelings., J Sci Labour, 46, 251
  28. 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90104-N · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-O · DOI
  30. SpielbergerCD GorsuchRL LusheneRD.STAI: Manual for the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press 1970.
  31. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  34. 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.5.805 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stein, K. D., Martin, S. C., Hann, D. M., & Jacobsen, P. B.
Venue
Cancer Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
143-152
ISSN
  • 1065-4704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5394
DOI
10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.006003143.x
OpenAlex
W2047502650
Cited by
373
References
8
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1334 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.