Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,782

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary Fat Intake and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women

Hu, Frank B., Stampfer, Meir J., Manson, JoAnn E., Rimm, Eric, Colditz, Graham A., Rosner, Bernard A., Hennekens, Charles H., Willett, Walter C.·1997·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejm199711203372102
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relation between dietary intake of specific types of fat, particularly trans unsaturated fat and the risk of coronary disease remains unclear. We therefore studied this relation in women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study. METHODS: We prospectively studied 80,082 women who were 34 to 59 years of age and had no known coronary disease, stroke, cancer, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes in 1980. Information on diet was obtained at base line and updated during follow-up by means of validated questionnaires. During 14 years of follow-up, we documented 939 cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease. Mutivariate analyses included age, smoking status, total energy intake, dietary cholesterol intake, percentages of energy obtained from protein and specific types of fat, and other risk factors. RESULTS: Each increase of 5 percent of energy intake from saturated fat, as compared with equivalent energy intake from carbohydrates, was associated with a 17 percent increase in the risk of coronary disease (relative risk, 1.17; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.41; P=0.10). As compared with equivalent energy from carbohydrates, the relative risk for a 2 percent increment in energy intake from trans unsaturated fat was 1.93 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.43 to 2.61; P<0.001); that for a 5 percent increment in energy from monounsaturated fat was 0.81 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.00; P=0.05); and that for a 5 percent increment in energy from polyunsaturated fat was 0.62 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.85; P= 0.003). Total fat intake was not signficantly related to the risk of coronary disease (for a 5 percent increase in energy from fat, the relative risk was 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.07; P=0.55). We estimated that the replacement of 5 percent of energy from saturated fat with energy from unsaturated fats would reduce risk by 42 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 23 to 56; P<0.001) and that the replacement of 2 percent of energy from trans fat with energy from unhydrogenated, unsaturated fats would reduce risk by 53 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 34 to 67; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that replacing saturated and trans unsaturated fats with unhydrogenated monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats is more effective in preventing coronary heart disease in women than reducing overall fat intake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199711203372102

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1161/01.CIR.65.5.839 · DOI
  2. Katan MB, 1997, N Engl J Med, 337, 563
  3. McGee DL, 1984, Am J Epidemiol, 119, 667, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113788 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1056/NEJM198503283121302 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kromhout D, 1984, Am J Epidemiol, 119, 733, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113794 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/01.CIR.63.3.500 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bmj.2.6098.1307 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1056/NEJM198101083040201 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Pietinen P, 1997, Am J Epidemiol, 145, 876, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009047 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ascherio A, 1996, BMJ, 313, 84, 10.1136/bmj.313.7049.84 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Willett WC. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  12. 10.1079/BJN19930035 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/archinte.151.6.1181 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90350-P · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/BF02680357 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF03028753 · DOI
  17. London SJ, 1991, Am J Clin Nutr, 54, 340, 10.1093/ajcn/54.2.340 · DOI
  18. Shekelle RB, 1982, Am J Epidemiol, 115, 506, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113332 · DOI
  19. Keys A, 1966, Am J Clin Nutr, 19, 175, 10.1093/ajcn/19.3.175 · DOI
  20. Krauss RM, 1996, Circulation, 94, 1795, 10.1161/01.CIR.94.7.1795 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1161/01.ATV.8.1.95 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00066-6 · DOI
  23. Stamler J, 1988, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 112, 1032
  24. 10.1097/00043798-199406000-00002 · DOI
  25. 10.2337/diacare.15.11.1572 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.87.10.3894 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jacobs D, 1992, Circulation, 86, 1046, 10.1161/01.CIR.86.3.1046 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2105/AJPH.84.5.722 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90273-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90274-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1146/annurev.nu.15.070195.002353 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kinsella JE, 1981, Am J Clin Nutr, 34, 2307, 10.1093/ajcn/34.10.2307 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90269-4 · DOI
  34. Trichopoulos D, 1995, Lancet, 345, 1108
  35. 10.2105/AJPH.87.5.740 · DOI

Cited by

Items 101–136 of 136

Metadata

Authors
Hu, F. B., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., Rimm, E., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B. A., Hennekens, C. H., & Willett, W. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
1997-11-20
Volume
337
Issue
21
Pages
1491-1499
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejm199711203372102
OpenAlex
W2331989640
Cited by
1,782
References
3
FWCI
67.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.