Cited by 301Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lifestyle Change and Mobility in Obese Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have limitations in mobility that increase with age. An intensive lifestyle intervention that produces weight loss and improves fitness could slow the loss of mobility in such patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 5145 overweight or obese adults between the ages of 45 and 74 years with type 2 diabetes to either an intensive lifestyle intervention or a diabetes support-and-education program; 5016 participants contributed data. We used hidden Markov models to characterize disability states and mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression to estimate the probability of functional decline. The primary outcome was self-reported limitation in mobility, with annual assessments for 4 years. RESULTS: At year 4, among 2514 adults in the lifestyle-intervention group, 517 (20.6%) had severe disability and 969 (38.5%) had good mobility; the numbers among 2502 participants in the support group were 656 (26.2%) and 798 (31.9%), respectively. The lifestyle-intervention group had a relative reduction of 48% in the risk of loss of mobility, as compared with the support group (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.63; P<0.001). Both weight loss and improved fitness (as assessed on treadmill testing) were significant mediators of this effect (P<0.001 for both variables). Adverse events that were related to the lifestyle intervention included a slightly higher frequency of musculoskeletal symptoms at year 1. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss and improved fitness slowed the decline in mobility in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes. (Funded by the Department of Health and Human Services and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00017953.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1110294

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1272 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rejeski, W. J., Ip, E. H., Bertoni, A. G., Bray, G. A., Evans, G., Gregg, E. W., & Zhang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-03-29
Volume
366
Issue
13
Pages
1209-1217
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143015497
Cited by
301
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30dk046204-15)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG031827A, R01AG031827, P30AG021332)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL101066, HL076441-01A1, R18HL076441, R01HL076441)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-57171, DK 57136, DK57149, DK 57002, DK57182, DK56990, (DK 046204, DK57008, DK57177, DK 57078, DK57219, U01DK057149, DK-57178, U01DK057151, U01DK057135, U01DK057131, U01DK056990, DK-57135, U01DK057136, DK-56992, DK57154, U01DK057178, U01DK057182, U01DK057078, U01DK057154, U01DK057008, U01DK057171, DK57131, U01DK057002, U01DK057219, U01DK056992, U01DK057177, P30DK017047, P30DK048520, DK 57151, P30-DK046204, P30-DK 48520)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR-0021140, M01RR-00051, M01RR002719, M01RR-00211, M01RR000056, M01RR01346, M01RR000051, M01RR001066, M01RR001346, UL1RR024153, M0-1-RR-02719, M01RR000211, M01-RR01066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, obesity, mobility (physical function), functional decline, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, physical fitness, diabetes support and education, older adults, musculoskeletal symptoms
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Physical Fitness, Risk, Weight Loss, Overweight, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review