Cited by 204Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Hierarchical clustering of brain activity during human nonrapid eye movement sleep

Open access
Boly, Mélanie, Perlbarg, Vincent, Marrelec, Guillaume, Schabus, Manuel, Laureys, Steven, Doyon, Julien, Pélégrini-Issac, Mélanie, Maquet, Pierre, Benali, Habib·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Consciousness is reduced during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep due to changes in brain function that are still poorly understood. Here, we tested the hypothesis that impaired consciousness during NREM sleep is associated with an increased modularity of brain activity. Cerebral connectivity was quantified in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging times series acquired in 13 healthy volunteers during wakefulness and NREM sleep. The analysis revealed a modification of the hierarchical organization of large-scale networks into smaller independent modules during NREM sleep, independently from EEG markers of the slow oscillation. Such modifications in brain connectivity, possibly driven by sleep ultraslow oscillations, could hinder the brain's ability to integrate information and account for decreased consciousness during NREM sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1111133109

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50009-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0900924106 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2015-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.282.5395.1846 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.066 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1634 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1112503108 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1087-0792(99)90012-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.020 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/25470707 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328347da94 · DOI
  12. M Steriade, RW McCarley Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2005).
  13. 10.1093/cercor/13.4.422 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1910-08.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0141-05.2005 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0305375101 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nrn2201 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.092 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.283.5401.549 · DOI · Paper page
  20. V Perlbarg, et al., NEDICA: Detection of group functional networks in fMRI using spatial independent component analysis. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Paris), pp. 1247–1250 (2008). · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.042 · DOI
  22. 10.1147/rd.41.0066 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.media.2008.02.002 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.057 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boly, M., Perlbarg, V., Marrelec, G., Schabus, M., Laureys, S., Doyon, J., Pélégrini-Issac, M., Maquet, P., & Benali, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Functional Neuroimaging Unit, Montreal Geriatrics Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada H3W 1W5
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale–Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 678, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Fonctionnelle, 75634 Cedex 13 Paris, France; and
Corresponding author
Maquet, Pierre
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-03-26
Volume
109
Issue
15
Pages
5856-5861
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2149745827
Cited by
204
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sleep Research Society
  • Austrian Science Fund (J 2470)
  • Université de Liège
  • Fondation Médicale Reine Elisabeth
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
NREM sleep, consciousness, brain connectivity, hierarchical clustering, network modularity, large-scale brain networks, resting-state functional connectivity, slow oscillations, information integration, wakefulness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review