The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 54 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning
Open accessAbstract
The superiority of spaced vs. massed training is a fundamental feature of learning. Here, we describe unanticipated timing rules for the production of long-term potentiation (LTP) in adult rat hippocampal slices that can account for one temporal segment of the spaced trials phenomenon. Successive bouts of naturalistic theta burst stimulation of field CA1 afferents markedly enhanced previously saturated LTP if spaced apart by 1 h or longer, but were without effect when shorter intervals were used. Analyses of F-actin-enriched spines to identify potentiated synapses indicated that the added LTP obtained with delayed theta trains involved recruitment of synapses that were “missed” by the first stimulation bout. Single spine glutamate-uncaging experiments confirmed that less than half of the spines in adult hippocampus are primed to undergo plasticity under baseline conditions, suggesting that intrinsic variability among individual synapses imposes a repetitive presentation requirement for maximizing the percentage of potentiated connections. We propose that a combination of local diffusion from initially modified spines coupled with much later membrane insertion events dictate that the repetitions be widely spaced. Thus, the synaptic mechanisms described here provide a neurobiological explanation for one component of a poorly understood, ubiquitous aspect of learning.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In adult rat hippocampal slices, a second theta burst stimulation delivered 60 min or more after the first produced additional LTP, whereas shorter delays did not, and this added potentiation recruited synapses missed by the first train. The findings suggest intrinsic spine threshold differences plus delayed membrane insertion events impose a spacing requirement that may explain one temporal component of distributed practice.
Key findings
- TBS2 at 10 or 30 min after TBS1 caused short-term but not additional long-term facilitation; at 60 min it doubled potentiation, and 90 min gave the same degree of LTP as 60 min. A third train at 60 min again increased potentiation, whereas a fourth and fifth had no effect.
- F-actin labeling showed TBS2 doubled the population of densely F-actin-positive spines above TBS1 alone; in GFP–phalloidin experiments, TBS1 left about 10% of spines with high F-actin versus 18% after TBS2 (P < 0.04), and the percentage of 5-μm dendritic segments with two or more labeled spines doubled after TBS2 (P < 0.005).
- Single-spine glutamate uncaging enlarged only ∼40% of targeted adult spines, compared with >80% of young spines (P < 0.005); adult spines that enlarged were refractory to successive induction even when uncaging events were separated by more than 1 h.
- Brefeldin A applied after TBS1 blocked additional LTP by TBS2 and caused LTP1 to decay; the ampakine CX614 increased LTP1 and substantially reduced LTP2.
Methods
- Acute hippocampal slices from young adult male Sprague–Dawley rats or C57BL/6 mice; Schaffer–commissural afferents in field CA1b were stimulated with TBS consisting of 10 bursts of 4 pulses at 100 Hz separated by 200 ms, with baseline/test responses at 3 pulses/min. Brefeldin A and CX614 were bath-applied at 20 μM.
- F-actin was imaged with Alexa Fluor 568–phalloidin and GFP-expressing mice using confocal microscopy; single-spine glutamate uncaging used two-photon imaging/uncaging in eGFP mice (2–3 or 8–10 wk), MNI-caged L-glutamate, and a >50% spine volume change threshold.
- Electrophysiology data are group means ± SEM with two-tailed Student t tests unless otherwise noted, significance at P < 0.05; spine volume statistics used t tests, one-way ANOVA, and repeated-measures ANOVA in SPSS and Excel.
Limitations
- Stated: the paper calls for future research on whether transcriptional mechanisms interact with the synapse-specific processes described, on longer intervals (days, weeks), and on unknown cell biological variables; the mechanism of the late priming step remains unresolved.
- Stated: brefeldin after TBS1 unexpectedly caused LTP1 to decay, and predicted AMPA receptor insertion would increase EPSPs at 30–60 min after TBS1, which was not observed, requiring alternative explanations.
- Evident: the findings are from acute hippocampal slices rather than behavioral learning or memory tests, and the uncaging experiments do not state the sex of the mice used.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 54 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within-train facilitation of theta burst responses was not detectably different at the 10–20-min vs. 60–90-min delays”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Single spine glutamate-uncaging experiments confirmed that less than half of the spines in adult hippocampus are primed to undergo plasticity under baseline conditions”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the same stimulation doubled the level of potentiation when delayed by 60 min (Fig. 1 A and B).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TBS2 delivered 90 min after TBS1 resulted in the same degree of LTP as obtained with a 60-min delay (Fig. 1E).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of F-actin-enriched spines to identify potentiated synapses indicated that the added LTP obtained with delayed theta trains involved recruitment of synapses that were “missed” by the first stimulation bout.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Automated counting showed that TBS1 causes a marked increase in densely F-actin-positive spines that is of comparable size at 15 and 75 min after stimulation (Fig. 2 A and B).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“similarly, 1-min trains of 5-Hz pulses fully reversed LTP2 when delivered 60 s, but not 60 min, after TBS2 (Fig. 1F).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The induction probability was not dependent on the time that the slice was in the recording chamber (Fig. 3E, Right).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Spines that enlarged after glutamate uncaging were refractory to successive attempts at induction, even when the timing between uncaging events was extended beyond one hour (Fig. 3E, Left).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The percentage of 5-μm dendritic segments with two or more labeled spines after TBS2 was double that found after TBS1 (P < 0.005) (Fig. 4B, Right).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 21
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A third train delayed by 60 min after TBS2 again increased potentiation, whereas a fourth and fifth had no effect (Fig. 1D).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TBS2 caused short-term, but not additional long-term, response facilitation when delivered at 10 or 30 min after TBS1.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Successive bouts of naturalistic theta burst stimulation of field CA1 afferents markedly enhanced previously saturated LTP if spaced apart by 1 h or longer, but were without effect when shorter intervals were used.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Forty-minute treatments that immediately preceded TBS1, or that ended 10 min before the theta bursts, had no effect on baseline physiology or the induction of LTP1 (Fig. 4D, Left).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as shown in Fig. 4D, brefeldin administered after TBS1 also produced a dramatic and unexpected result: it caused LTP1 to gradually decay back to baseline, again without affecting responses to a control input.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Head volume changes did not occur in neighboring spines, confirming that the stimulation protocol produces plasticity at a single synapse.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the enlargement probability was significantly greater in young than in adult slices (P < 0.005) even though the targeted spines were of similar volume and the same induction protocol was used (Fig. 3D).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such an event would necessarily increase excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) at 30–60 min after TBS1 and this is not observed.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Regarding the cellular bases for the distinction between low and high threshold spines, we found that brief treatments with a drug that selectively enhances AMPA receptor-gated synaptic currents markedly increases both the number of spines in which TBS1 triggers actin polymerization and the magnitude of LTP1.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the glutamate-uncaging experiments were designed to produce maximal stimulation of NMDARs and yet detected two classes of spines in the proportions expected from the LTP studies.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, and, in particular, long-term potentiation (LTP) of glutamatergic transmission, is thought to underlie rapid storage of new information (5, 6).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Lynch G, Rex CS, Chen LY, Gall CM. Synaptic mechanisms for encoding memory. In: Koob G, Thompson RF, Le Moal M, editors. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience. London: Academic; 2009. pp. 356–366. section ed Shors T. [Google Scholar]
- Not checked yetcites [6] Morris RG. Long-term potentiation and memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:643–647. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other studies using variable stimulation intensities suggest that additional potentiation can be induced four hours after induction of LTP1 (10, 12).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Frey U, Morris RG. Synaptic tagging: Implications for late maintenance of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:181–188. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01189-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Frey U, Schollmeier K, Reymann KG, Seidenbecher T. Asymptotic hippocampal long-term potentiation in rats does not preclude additional potentiation at later phases. Neuroscience. 1995;67:799–807. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00117-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Low-frequency (5-Hz) stimulation erases LTP1 if applied shortly after TBS but then becomes progressively less effective over the following 30 min (8, 14);”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Huang CC, Liang YC, Hsu KS. A role for extracellular adenosine in time-dependent reversal of long-term potentiation by low-frequency stimulation at hippocampal CA1 synapses. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9728–9738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-22-09728.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Barrionuevo G, Schottler F, Lynch G. The effects of repetitive low frequency stimulation on control and “potentiated” synaptic responses in the hippocampus. Life Sci. 1980;27:2385–2391. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(80)90509-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In all, the present results show that LTP has a previously undetected refractory period, lasting for 30–60 min, which creates an analog of the behavioral spaced trials effect (13).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Anderson MJ, Jablonski SA, Klimas DB. Spaced initial stimulus familiarization enhances novelty preference in Long-Evans rats. Behav Processes. 2008;78:481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves local spreading of signaling cascades from the activated spine to its neighbors, and some of these spreading signals are potent drivers of F-actin dynamics (24–26).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Murakoshi H, Wang H, Yasuda R. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature. 2011;472:100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature09823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Harvey CD, Yasuda R, Zhong H, Svoboda K. The spread of Ras activity triggered by activation of a single dendritic spine. Science. 2008;321:136–140. doi: 10.1126/science.1159675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Rex CS, et al. Different Rho GTPase-dependent signaling pathways initiate sequential steps in the consolidation of long-term potentiation. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:85–97. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200901084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The spaced-trial effect operates across multiple time frames, ranging from a few seconds to weeks (30).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:354–380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Previous efforts to find neurobiological explanations for the advantages of distributed practice obtained evidence that spaced trials can offset memory defects in mice lacking two variants of the transcription factor CREB (31, 32).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Kogan JH, et al. Spaced training induces normal long-term memory in CREB mutant mice. Curr Biol. 1997;7:1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Yin JC, et al. Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell. 1994;79:49–58. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90399-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This form of plasticity shares many properties with Schaffer collateral LTP, including dependence on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), Rho GTPase signaling, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) phosphorylation, F-actin polymerization and synaptic AMPAR insertion (20–24).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Harvey CD, Svoboda K. Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature. 2007;450:1195–1200. doi: 10.1038/nature06416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature. 2004;429:761–766. doi: 10.1038/nature02617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Honkura N, Matsuzaki M, Noguchi J, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. The subspine organization of actin fibers regulates the structure and plasticity of dendritic spines. Neuron. 2008;57:719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Makino H, Malinow R. AMPA receptor incorporation into synapses during LTP: The role of lateral movement and exocytosis. Neuron. 2009;64:381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Murakoshi H, Wang H, Yasuda R. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature. 2011;472:100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature09823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter finding points to a hypothesis in which similarly delayed events set in motion by TBS1 serve to anchor LTP in one set of spines and to provide ingredients needed for potentiation in a second.”
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The low success rate in adults was unlikely related to technical issues because we used a strong induction protocol (20) that caused structural plasticity in >80% of young spines (Fig. 3C), a value in good agreement with previous studies (20, 21).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Harvey CD, Svoboda K. Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature. 2007;450:1195–1200. doi: 10.1038/nature06416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature. 2004;429:761–766. doi: 10.1038/nature02617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and (ii) conversion of TBS1-resistant spines into the low threshold state, which provides a refreshed pool of synapses capable of responding to TBS2.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Precise alignment of the stimulation scanner to the image scanner was confirmed by ablation of a 0.5-μm tetraspec bead (Invitrogen) with a high-energy pulse of 720-nm light.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“several studies have shown that the kinase PKMζ is engaged at ≥1 h after induction and then contributes to maintenance of LTP (39).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Sacktor TC. PKMzeta, LTP maintenance, and the dynamic molecular biology of memory storage. Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One aspect of our data links the requirement for long delays to machinery that also serves to stabilize previously induced LTP and, thereby, supports consolidation explanations (43) for the behavioral effects.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Glenberg AM. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Mem Cognit. 1979;7:95–112. doi: 10.3758/bf03197590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prior work suggesting that strong stimulation of single synapses causes the spread of active GTPases to neighboring spines (24, 25) is of interest in this regard because these enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Murakoshi H, Wang H, Yasuda R. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature. 2011;472:100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature09823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Harvey CD, Yasuda R, Zhong H, Svoboda K. The spread of Ras activity triggered by activation of a single dendritic spine. Science. 2008;321:136–140. doi: 10.1126/science.1159675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“because these enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“spines (24, 25) is of interest in this regard because these enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Murakoshi H, Wang H, Yasuda R. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature. 2011;472:100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature09823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Harvey CD, Yasuda R, Zhong H, Svoboda K. The spread of Ras activity triggered by activation of a single dendritic spine. Science. 2008;321:136–140. doi: 10.1126/science.1159675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, it implies that the delayed membrane insertion step indicated by the brefeldin experiments involves delivery of AMPA receptors to synapses.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This threshold was chosen before the experiments were conducted and was based on prior studies (21).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature. 2004;429:761–766. doi: 10.1038/nature02617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Volume changes at nearby spines were also analyzed to ensure that laser targeting of individual spines was specific.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, previously undetected cellular mechanisms impose temporal spacing requirements for synaptic plasticity and, thereby, provide a neurobiological explanation for one temporal segment of a ubiquitous feature of learning.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Reports that induction of LTP is accompanied by prolonged activation of CaMKII (38), a kinase localized to synapses, suggest a candidate for this role.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Lisman J, Schulman H, Cline H. The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:175–190. doi: 10.1038/nrn753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spine threshold component of the present results implies that spaced trials capture a greater percentage of the information carried by activated afferent systems, something that would allow for easier cue recognition during retention tests.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The priming effect of TBS1 on nonresponsive spines occurs at a stage located between the transmitter receptors and the multiple steps leading to the assembly and stabilization of actin filaments.
“We, therefore, assume that the priming effect of TBS1 on nonresponsive spines occurs at a stage located between the transmitter receptors and the multiple steps leading to the assembly and stabilization of actin filaments.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, for longer intervals (60 or 90 minutes), a cumulative increase in LTP was observed over three bursts of stimulation.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Theta-burst stimuli applied at intervals of 10 or 40 minutes did not cumulatively increase LTP.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“The second theta-burst stimulus yielded polymerization in spines that were not apparently affected by the first stimulus, if the second followed the first by 60 or 90 minutes.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“This 60-minute interval was predicted to be optimal for learning because stimuli separated by 60 minutes had previously been found to enhance LTP in wild-type rodents47.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“For the spaced LTP protocol of Gall, Lynch and colleagues47,48, an interval of 40–60 minutes is needed for successive theta-burst stimuli to further increase LTP.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Kramár et al.47 noted that in hippocampal slices, additional potentiation can be induced up to 4 hours after induction of the first LTP increment81.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“The required refractory period of ~1 hour between successive theta-burst stimuli to induce progressive increments in hippocampal LTP46,47 may be in line with the first of these variants, which is that short intervals are insufficient for consolidation and consequent summation of memory traces.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
CREB study described as involving mice is cited as a Drosophila study
MinorThe discussion describes references 31 and 32 as studies of memory defects in mice, but reference 32 explicitly concerns Drosophila.
“Previous efforts to find neurobiological explanations for the advantages of distributed practice obtained evidence that spaced trials can offset memory defects in mice lacking two variants of the transcription factor CREB (31, 32).”
“32.Yin JC, et al. Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila.”
Citations
Cites
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,268
Imaging Neuronal Subsets in Transgenic Mice Expressing Multiple Spectral Variants of GFP
Feng, G., Mellor, R. H., Bernstein, M., Keller-Peck, C., Nguyen, Q. T., Wallace, M., Nerbonne, J. M., Lichtman, J. W., & Sanes, J. R. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2 · Cited by 3,042
Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02617 · Cited by 2,483
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888 · cited 2×
“Discussion The spaced-trial effect operates across multiple time frames, ranging from a few seconds to weeks (30).”
BackgroundThe molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory
Lisman, J., Schulman, H., & Cline, H. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn753 · Cited by 1,860
Brefeldin A: insights into the control of membrane traffic and organelle structure.
Klausner, R. D., Donaldson, J. G., & Lippincott‐Schwartz, J. (1992) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.116.5.1071 · Cited by 1,843
Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila
Yin, J. C. P., Wallach, J. S., Del Vecchio, M., Wilder, E. L., Zhou, H., Quinn, W. G., & Tully, T. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90399-9 · Cited by 959
Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites
Harvey, C. D., & Svoboda, K. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06416 · Cited by 625
Synaptic tagging: implications for late maintenance of hippocampal long-term potentiation
Frey, U., & Morris, R. G. M. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01189-2 · Cited by 615
Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines
Murakoshi, H., Wang, H., & Yasuda, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09823 · Cited by 564
AMPA Receptor Incorporation into Synapses during LTP: The Role of Lateral Movement and Exocytosis
Makino, H., & Malinow, R. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.035 · Cited by 501
The Subspine Organization of Actin Fibers Regulates the Structure and Plasticity of Dendritic Spines
Honkura, N., Matsuzaki, M., Noguchi, J., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.013 · Cited by 490
Brefeldin A: Deciphering an Enigmatic Inhibitor of Secretion
Nebenführ, A., Ritzenthaler, C., & Robinson, D. G. (2002) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.011569 · Cited by 487
Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
Glenberg, A. M. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197590 · Cited by 444
The Spread of Ras Activity Triggered by Activation of a Single Dendritic Spine
Harvey, C. D., Yasuda, R., Zhong, H., & Svoboda, K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159675 · Cited by 434
Regulation of Cell Migration by the Calcium-dependent Protease Calpain
Huttenlocher, A., Palecek, S. P., Lu, Q., Zhang, W., Mellgren, R. L., Lauffenburger, D. A., Ginsberg, M. H., & Horwitz, A. F. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.52.32719 · Cited by 390
Hintzman, D. L. (1976) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60464-8 · Cited by 388
A Role of Actin Filament in Synaptic Transmission and Long-Term Potentiation
Kim, C.-H., & Lisman, J. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04314.1999 · Cited by 386
Krucker, T., Siggins, G. R., & Halpain, S. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.100139797 · Cited by 374
Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning
Kim, J. J., & Thompson, R. F. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10081-3 · Cited by 358
Spaced training induces normal long-term memory in CREB mutant mice
Kogan, J. H., Frankland, P. W., Blendy, J. A., Coblentz, J., Marowitz, Z., Schütz, G., & Silva, A. J. (1997) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00022-4 · Cited by 350
Rex, C. S., Lin, C.-Y., Kramár, E. A., Chen, L. Y., Gall, C. M., & Lynch, G. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4037-06.2007 · Cited by 324
Self-citationBarrionuevo, G., Schottler, F., & Lynch, G. (1980) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(80)90509-3 · Cited by 321
Self-citationLocal protein synthesis, actin dynamics, and LTP consolidation
Bramham, C. R. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.013 · Cited by 301
Rex, C. S., Chen, L. Y., Sharma, A., Liu, J., Babayan, A. H., Gall, C. M., & Lynch, G. (2009) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200901084 · Cited by 293
Self-citationÜber das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie
Ebbinghaus, H. (2018) · Cited by 286
Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5432 · Cited by 266
Long-term potentiation and memory
Morris, R. G. M. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1230 · Cited by 232
Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1974) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198154 · Cited by 224
Integrin-driven actin polymerization consolidates long-term potentiation
Kramár, E. A., Lin, B., Rex, C. S., Gall, C. M., & Lynch, G. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601354103 · Cited by 221
Self-citationLTP consolidation: Substrates, explanatory power, and functional significance
Lynch, G., Rex, C. S., & Gall, C. M. (2007) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.027 · Cited by 214
Self-citationPharmacology of Ampakine Modulators: From AMPA Receptors to Synapses and Behavior
Arai, A., & Kessler, M. (2007) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/138945007780618490 · Cited by 211
Chapter 2 PKMζ, LTP maintenance, and the dynamic molecular biology of memory storage
Sacktor, T. C. (2008) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(07)00002-7 · Cited by 208
Ebbinghaus, H. (1996) · University of Toronto eBooks · Cited by 203
Vanderklish, P. W., Krushel, L. A., Holst, B. H., Gally, J. A., Crossin, K. L., & Edelman, G. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.040565597 · Cited by 163
Fanselow, M. S. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81002-8 · Cited by 159
Arai, A., Kessler, M., Rogers, G. A., & LYNCH, G. S. (2000) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.58.4.802 · Cited by 141
Self-citationAMPA receptor modulators as cognitive enhancers
LYNCH, G. S. (2003) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2003.09.009 · Cited by 138
Self-citationHuang, C.-C., Liang, Y.-C., & Hsu, K.-S. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-09728.1999 · Cited by 127
Fanselow, M. S., & Tighe, T. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.2.187 · Cited by 101
Frey, U., Schollmeier, K., Reymann, K. G., & Seidenbecher, T. (1995) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(95)00117-2 · Cited by 93
Die Assoziationsfestigkeit in ihrer Abh?ngigkeit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen.
Smith, W. G. (1897) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0065777 · Cited by 88
Proteases involved in long-term potentiation
Tomimatsu, Y., Idemoto, S., Moriguchi, S., Watanabe, S., & Nakanishi, H. (2002) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(02)02285-3 · Cited by 88
Teo, J., Swayne, O. B. C., Cheeran, B., Greenwood, R., & Rothwell, J. C. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq231 · Cited by 88
Thorndike, E. L. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 73
Sassoé‐Pognetto, M., Utvik, J. K., Camoletto, P., Watanabe, M., Stephenson, F. A., Bredt, D. S., & Ottersen, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10745 · Cited by 45
Lin, C., LYNCH, G. S., & Gall, C. M. (2005) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03203.x · Cited by 37
Self-citationSpaced initial stimulus familiarization enhances novelty preference in Long-Evans rats
Anderson, M. J., Jablonski, S. A., & Klimas, D. B. (2008) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.005 · Cited by 30
Synaptic Mechanisms for Encoding Memory
LYNCH, G. S., Rex, C. S., Chen, L. Y., & Gall, C. M. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-045396-5.00149-4 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Cole, E. J., Stimpson, K. H., Bentzley, B. S., Gulser, M., Cherian, K., Tischler, C., Nejad, R., Pankow, H., Choi, E., Aaron, H., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720 · Cited by 802
Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Cole, E. J., Phillips, A. L., Bentzley, B. S., Stimpson, K. H., Nejad, R., Barmak, F., Veerapal, C., Khan, N., Cherian, K., Felber, E., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429 · Cited by 795
Dendritic Spines: The Locus of Structural and Functional Plasticity
Sala, C., & Segal, M. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00012.2013 · Cited by 491
Structural Components of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory ConsolidationPreprint
Bailey, C. H., Kandel, E. R., & Harris, K. M. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021758 · Cited by 419
The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning
Smolen, P., Zhang, Y., & Byrne, J. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.18 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramár, E. A., Babayan, A. H., Gavin, C. F., Cox, C. D., Jafari, M., Gall, C. M., Rumbaugh, G., & Lynch, G.
- Affiliations
- Departments of aAnatomy and Neurobiology and
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-03-12
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5121-5126
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3323981
- OpenAlex
- W1998698062
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH083346)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS045260, NS045260, R01NS064079, NS064079)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- spaced learning, massed training, long-term potentiation, theta burst stimulation, hippocampal CA1, synaptic plasticity, glutamate uncaging, synaptic variability, membrane insertion
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Synaptic Transmission, Synapses, Theta Rhythm, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Rats, Polymerization, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review