Cited by 176DNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine

Sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) rescues the decline of homologous recombination repair during replicative senescence

Open access
Mao, Zhiyong, Tian, Xiao, Van Meter, Michael, Ke, Zhonghe, Gorbunova, Vera, Seluanov, Andrei·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Genomic instability is a hallmark of aging tissues. Genomic instability may arise from the inefficient or aberrant function of DNA double-stranded break (DSB) repair. DSBs are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). HR is a precise pathway, whereas NHEJ frequently leads to deletions or insertions at the repair site. Here, we used normal human fibroblasts with a chromosomally integrated HR reporter cassette to examine the changes in HR efficiency as cells progress to replicative senescence. We show that HR declines sharply with increasing replicative age, with an up to 38-fold decrease in efficiency in presenescent cells relative to young cells. This decline is not explained by a reduction of the number of cells in S/G 2 /M stage as presenescent cells are actively dividing. Expression of proteins involved in HR such as Rad51, Rad51C, Rad52, NBS1, and Sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) diminished with cellular senescence. Supplementation of Rad51, Rad51C, Rad52, and NBS1 proteins, either individually or in combination, did not rescue the senescence-related decline of HR. However, overexpression of SIRT6 in “middle-aged” and presenescent cells strongly stimulated HR repair, and this effect was dependent on mono-ADP ribosylation activity of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP1). These results suggest that in aging cells, the precise HR pathway becomes repressed giving way to a more error-prone NHEJ pathway. These changes in the processing of DSBs may contribute to age-related genomic instability and a higher incidence of cancer with age. SIRT6 activation provides a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent the decline in genome maintenance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1200583109

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most DNA repair factors are downregulated in senescent cells, decreasing repair activity, especially homologous repair.

    “Most DNA repair factors are downregulated in senescent cells resulting in decreased repair activity, especially homologous repair pathway activity (Mao et al., 2012; Seluanov et al., 2004).”

    From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, Z., Tian, X., Van Meter, M., Ke, Z., Gorbunova, V., & Seluanov, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-07-02
Volume
109
Issue
29
Pages
11800-11805
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2092010310
Cited by
176
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (F31AG041603, R01AG027237)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
SIRT6, homologous recombination repair, replicative senescence, genomic instability, aging, DNA double-strand break repair, non-homologous end joining, PARP1, mono-ADP-ribosylation, RAD51, NBS1, RAD51C, RAD52, human fibroblasts, age-related cancer risk
MeSH terms
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1, Age Factors, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Cellular Senescence, Sirtuins, Genomic Instability, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review