Cited by 191Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Laminar analysis of visually evoked activity in the primary visual cortex

Open access
Xing, Dajun, Yeh, Chun-I, Burns, Samuel, Shapley, Robert M.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Studying the laminar pattern of neural activity is crucial for understanding the processing of neural signals in the cerebral cortex. We measured neural population activity [multiunit spike activity (MUA) and local field potential, LFP] in Macaque primary visual cortex (V1) in response to drifting grating stimuli. Sustained visually driven MUA was at an approximately constant level across cortical depth in V1. However, sustained, visually driven, local field potential power, which was concentrated in the γ-band (20–60 Hz), was greatest at the cortical depth corresponding to cortico-cortical output layers 2, 3, and 4B. γ-band power also tends to be more sustained in the output layers. Overall, cortico-cortical output layers accounted for 67% of total γ-band activity in V1, whereas 56% of total spikes evoked by drifting gratings were from layers 2, 3, and 4B. The high-resolution layer specificity of γ-band power, the laminar distribution of MUA and γ-band activity, and their dynamics imply that neural activity in V1 is generated by laminar-specific mechanisms. In particular, visual responses of MUA and γ-band activity in cortico-cortical output layers 2, 3, and 4B seem to be strongly influenced by laminar-specific recurrent circuitry and/or feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1201478109

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gamma power is higher in superficial, feedforward, cortical layers, and alpha/beta power is higher in deep, feedback, cortical layers.

    “This is consistent with gamma power being higher in the superficial, feedforward, cortical layers, and alpha/beta power being higher in the deep, feedback, cortical layers (26, 35–40).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [40]

    The passage on visually driven LFP γ-power (page unavailable) reports that sustained gamma power is highest in V1 layers 2, 3, and 4B and lower in deeper layers. The paper does not establish that alpha/beta power is higher in deep layers. It also describes sustained gamma activity in output layers as potentially arising from recurrent or feedback interactions, rather than identifying it simply as feedforward activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]De Valois RL, De Valois KK. Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford Univ Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xing, D., Yeh, C.-I., Burns, S., & Shapley, R. M.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-07
Volume
109
Issue
34
Pages
13871-13876
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2061665919
Cited by
191
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (T32EY007158, R01EY 01472, R01EY001472)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
primary visual cortex, laminar organization, local field potentials, gamma oscillations, cortical depth, feedback, macaque
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Mapping, Electrodes, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Macaca, Models, Biological, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review