The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 79 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Reactivation is a key process that updates memory by strengthening existing memories and incorporating relevant new information, thus supporting the dynamic and flexible nature of memory. This adaptive function, however, can sometimes contribute to memory distortions. The current study examines how neural mechanisms that operate during reactivation of memories for a museum tour contribute to enhancement of existing memories, while also supporting integration of novel information that can contribute to false memories. Our results reveal similarities and differences in the neural mechanisms of reactivation associated with subsequent true and false memories for real-world events, thereby illuminating how memories change over time as a consequence of reactivation—a process that has important implications for understanding the unreliability of eyewitness memories.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Memory reactivation during fMRI both strengthened later true memories for a museum tour and increased later false memories for novel lure photographs from an alternate tour. The quality of reactivation, indexed by subjective reliving, modulated subsequent true and false memories via partly shared and partly distinct neural recruitment.
Key findings
- Reactivation increased subsequent hits [t(32) = 6.05, P < 0.0001] and subsequent false alarms [t(32) = 6.67, P < 0.0001] compared with baseline items not shown during scanning.
- Higher reliving ratings predicted subsequent hits versus misses [t(32) = 13.68, P < 0.0001] and subsequent false alarms versus correct rejections [t(32) = 3.96, P = 0.0003]; trial-by-trial correlations were r = 0.34, P < 0.0001 for true memories and r = 0.09, P = 0.0004 for false memories.
- Subsequent true and false memory effects both recruited left posterior parahippocampal, bilateral retrosplenial, and bilateral posterior inferior parietal cortices. For true memories, these regions showed greater recruitment during target than lure phases; for false memories, recruitment was equal across target and lure phases.
- Subsequent hits were associated with greater rostral medial PFC and posterior cingulate recruitment during target versus lure phases for highly relived memories, whereas subsequent false alarms were associated with greater vmPFC, ventrolateral PFC, lateral temporal cortex, and right anterior hippocampus recruitment during target versus lure phases.
Methods
- Thirty-five participants (18–30 y old, 19 women) completed three sessions separated by 48 h: a self-guided museum tour with a camera taking photographs every 15 s, an fMRI scanning session, and a recognition-memory test. Two participants were excluded for computer issues, and seven additional participants were excluded from fMRI analysis only for quality-control issues.
- During scanning, participants viewed target photographs from their own tour to reactivate memories, rated reliving, and on full trials then viewed a novel lure photograph from an alternate tour and rated relatedness. Later, they made old/new recognition judgments for reactivated targets and lures and baseline targets and lures.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 3T scanner and analyzed in SPM8 using a general linear model, a compound-trial approach to separate target and lure phases, subsequent memory contrasts (hits minus misses; false alarms minus correct rejections), and parametric modulation by reliving ratings. Reported analyses used a threshold of P < 0.001, uncorrected, with a cluster size of 10 voxels.
Limitations
- The paper states that reactivation quality was defined according to subjective recollection, so the findings could also reflect the contribution of memory strength during reactivation.
- The paper states that it remains an open question whether all varieties of memory distortion can be conceived as costs associated with adaptive features of memory.
- Evident from the text: fMRI results are reported at an uncorrected threshold of P < 0.001 with a 10-voxel cluster cutoff, and the final fMRI sample was reduced by exclusions, which may limit statistical robustness.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
34 Not checked yet · 31 Own result · 11 Own interpretation · 10 Own method · 1 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants made higher reliving ratings for photographs associated with subsequent hits versus subsequent misses [t(32) = 13.68, P < 0.0001] and with subsequent false alarms versus subsequent correct rejections [t(32) = 3.96, P = 0.0003].”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reactivation condition equally increased subsequent hits [t(32) = 6.05, P < 0.0001] and subsequent false alarms [t(32) = 6.67, P < 0.0001] compared with the baseline condition consisting of target and lure photographs that were not shown during session 2 (i.e., items that were not scanned; Fig. 1B).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reactivation condition equally increased subsequent hits [t(32) = 6.05, P < 0.0001] and subsequent false alarms [t(32) = 6.67, P < 0.0001] compared with the baseline condition consisting of target and lure photographs that were not shown during session 2 (i.e., items that were not scanned; Fig. 1B).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants made higher reliving ratings for photographs associated with subsequent hits versus subsequent misses [t(32) = 13.68, P < 0.0001] and with subsequent false alarms versus subsequent correct rejections [t(32) = 3.96, P = 0.0003].”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, subsequent false alarms were associated with greater recruitment of vmPFC, ventrolateral PFC, lateral temporal cortex, and right anterior hippocampus during target compared with lure phases for highly relived memories.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interaction was reflected by greater recruitment during target than during lure phases for subsequent true memories but equal recruitment of these regions across both trial phases for subsequent false memories.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, the influence of reliving on subsequent memory remained after controlling for how quickly the memory was retrieved and the relatedness of novel information (SI Results).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interaction was reflected by greater recruitment during target than during lure phases for subsequent true memories but equal recruitment of these regions across both trial phases for subsequent false memories.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this prediction, there was no overlap in neural recruitment for subsequent memory effects between the reactivation condition and the novel encoding condition (Table S3).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there was a significant within-participant correlation between reliving ratings and subsequent true memories (r = 0.34, P < 0.0001) and between reliving ratings and subsequent false memories (r = 0.09, P = 0.0004).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results showed that stronger reliving of the target improved memory for the target, but also increased memory for the lure that followed (Fig. 1C).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that recruitment of the posterior parahippocampal, retrosplenial, and posterior inferior parietal cortices increased on a trial-by-trial basis with increases in reliving, and thus were associated with the quality of reactivation (Fig. 2C).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Equal neural recruitment in these regions during target and lure presentation supported the incorporation of novel information that contributed to false memories, whereas reduced recruitment during lure presentation was associated with true memories.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In line with this idea, we found a significant association between reliving and relatedness ratings, and that this association contributed more to false than true memories.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, posterior hippocampus contributed equally to subsequent hits and false alarms, consistent with its role in representing detailed contextual information that more generally supports recollection (59).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Compared with subsequent false alarms, we found that subsequent hits were associated with posterior cingulate cortex and rostral medial PFC, which are core midline regions of the default network (74) that support self-referential processes (82, 83) and successful encoding of self-relevant information (84–86).”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One explanation is that target reactivation and related pattern completion processes may linger during the processing of the lure and affect the degree of relatedness of the lures (81), thus contributing to false memories.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Here we defined reactivation quality according to subjective recollection, and thus, our findings could also reflect the contribution of memory strength during reactivation (68).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68]
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Subjective reliving ratings provide a valid index of the quality of memory reactivation.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results converge with these findings, but extend this work by demonstrating that the quality of reactivation is a key mechanism and also by showing that these processes support the formation of false memories.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The present study significantly extends this work by demonstrating that reactivation can both protect true memories and support the incorporation of new information leading to false memories, depending upon neural recruitment during reactivation.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This restructuring of memories could facilitate re-encoding and reconsolidation processes that contribute to updating of long-term memory representations.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Contextual reinstatement may strengthen existing memory and/or integrate existing memory with novel information provided by the retrieval cues, in much the same way that retrieval practice is thought to support memory via elaboration of the memory trace (73).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our data show that the quality of reactivation is one mechanism by which retrieval influences memory, and we suggest a link between contextual reinstatement via neural recruitment of the posterior parahippocampal, retrosplenial, and posterior inferior parietal cortices in the enhancement and distortion in later memory.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Subjective reliving ratings provide a valid index of the quality of memory reactivation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our findings also fit with an adaptive perspective on memory distortion (6, 20–23), in which reactivation allows for the incorporation of relevant new information that is essential for the operation of a dynamic memory system, but which comes at the cost of memory distortions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6]
- Not checked yetcites [20]
- Not checked yetcites [21]
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
- Not checked yetcites [23]
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results converge with these findings, but further indicate that neural recruitment that differentiates subsequent true and false memories during presentation of novel information depends on the extent to which memory for the original experience is reactivated rather than source confusion between the presence or absence of a lure.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, here we show that the quality of reactivation modulates both the extent of subsequent memory effects, and the neural recruitment associated with these memory effects.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Subjective reliving ratings provide a valid index of the quality of memory reactivation.
In the paper
“These findings suggest that reactivation may enhance true memories by elaborating upon memory details related to oneself (87), but increase false memories via binding of novel information.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both in the laboratory and everyday life, much evidence shows that people sometimes remember events differently from the way they actually unfolded and under some conditions remember events that never happened (9–12).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9]
- Not checked yetcites [10] source
- Not checked yetcites [11]
- Not checked yetcites [12]
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Updating relies on the process of memory reactivation, or the activation of a latent memory trace when we are reminded of a past experience, which is a key process that shapes long-term memory representations by reorganizing them over distributed brain networks (39–41).”
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A third kind of evidence for adaptive-memory distortion comes from the well-known postevent misinformation effect, where people incorporate erroneous information encountered after an original event into their memory of the original event (2).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2]
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This research is supported by studies showing that the hippocampus and vmPFC enable rapid consolidation of novel information when it can be linked to existing memory representations (60).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A related line of research suggests that the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) support flexible memory processes that allow memories to be combined and used in novel ways, and that contribute to memory updating.”
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the nature of awake reactivation, with some studies showing that reactivation enhances or even protects memory from new information (54, 64, 65) and other studies indicating that reactivation incorporates new information into memory (49, 65–67).”
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Retrosplenial cortex is thought to support integration and translation between egocentric spatial representations in posterior parietal cortex and allocentric spatial representations in the MTL (71), and these processes are recruited to a greater extent when spatial context needs to be updated and manipulated (72).”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hippocampus and vmPFC are part of a MTL subsystem of the default network (74) that supports the formation of mental models based on mnemonic content during both memory retrieval and the simulation and encoding of future events (36, 75, 76).”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Memory reactivation is a central component of computational theories of memory (40), which hold that it supports the stabilization of memory over distributed brain networks.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The museum paradigm allowed us to exert control over the encoding of real-world events and to verify the accuracy of memories for subsequent memory analysis.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the anterior hippocampus represents global context through its connections with vmPFC and related schematic processes that could support the incorporation of novel information (59).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven additional participants were excluded from the fMRI analysis only because of quality control issues (SI Materials and Methods).”
plainn = 7- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During encoding of misinformation, some studies have shown recruitment of anterior and posterior midline regions that protect true memories (51), and hippocampal recruitment that supports the formation of false memories (52).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51]
- Not checked yetcites [52]
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A threshold of P < 0.001, uncorrected, with a cluster size of 10 voxels was used for all reported analyses.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two participants were excluded due to computer issues.”
plaindirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The order of reactivation and encoding conditions was counterbalanced between participants.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A minimum of eight trials per trial type was used as a cutoff for inclusion in the analysis.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cushions were used to minimize head movement”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were two versions of the tour, which were counterbalanced between participants.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Photographs from each participant’s camera were inspected to ensure that the participant adhered to the instructions, and if the camera captured a photograph of a unique museum stop from the alternate tour, it was excluded from further analysis.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They were not told whether the lure photographs were from the tour or not.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Subjective reliving ratings provide a valid index of the quality of memory reactivation.
“Here we defined reactivation quality according to subjective recollection, and thus, our findings could also reflect the contribution of memory strength during reactivation (68).”
“using the reliving rating, our putative marker of the quality of reactivation”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most prior laboratory-based EM studies used cue words or images to trigger memory retrieval and mental time travel to the past in a controlled fashion [5,6,12,31,60,80,87,103–105].”
From First-person view of one’s body in immersive virtual reality: Influence on episodic memory (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“t(32) = 3.96, P = 0.0003”
Reported p = .0003 · recomputed p < .001
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upt(32) = 3.96reported p = .0003 · recomputed p < .001
“t(32) = 3.96, p = .0003”
- Consistentt(32) = 6.05reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(32) = 6.05, p < .0001”
- Consistentt(32) = 6.67reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(32) = 6.67, p < .0001”
- Consistentt(32) = 13.68reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(32) = 13.68, p < .0001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,082
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 · Cited by 3,792
Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005 · Cited by 2,767
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001975 · Cited by 2,031
The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836
Self-citationThe critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796 · cited 1×
“Contextual reinstatement may strengthen existing memory and/ or integrate existing memory with novel information provided by the retrieval cues, in much the same way that retrieval practice is thought to support memory via elaboration of the memory trace (73).”
BackgroundCoordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep
Ji, D., & Wilson, M. A. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1825 · Cited by 1,669
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- FC Bartlett Remembering (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, 1932).
- E Loftus Eyewitness Testimony (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, 1979).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Memory integration: neural mechanisms and implications for behavior
Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2014) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.005 · Cited by 442
Real-Life Neuroscience: An Ecological Approach to Brain and Behavior Research
Shamay‐Tsoory, S., & Mendelsohn, A. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619856350 · Cited by 319
Resilience after trauma: The role of memory suppression
Mary, A., Dayan, J., Leone, G., Postel, C., Fraisse, F., Malle, C., Vallée, T., Klein-Peschanski, C., Viader, F., Sayette, V. D. L., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay8477 · Cited by 272
Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.11.005 · Cited by 164
Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review.
Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000166 · Cited by 143
Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory
Palombo, D. J., Sheldon, S., & Levine, B. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.007 · Cited by 163
Shifting visual perspective during retrieval shapes autobiographical memories
St. Jacques, P. L., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.028 · Cited by 108
Self-citationFlexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories.
Carpenter, A. C., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000340 · Cited by 108
Self-citationDecoding fMRI Signatures of Real-world Autobiographical Memory Retrieval
Rissman, J., Chow, T. E., Reggente, N., & Wagner, A. D. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00920 · Cited by 106
Peri-encoding predictors of memory encoding and consolidation
Cohen, N., Pell, L., Edelson, M. G., Ben-Yakov, A., Pine, A., & Dudai, Y. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.002 · Cited by 98
Does reactivation trigger episodic memory change? a meta-analysis
Scully, I. D., Napper, L. E., & Hupbach, A. (2017) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2016.12.012 · Cited by 90
First-person view of one’s body in immersive virtual reality: Influence on episodic memory
Bréchet, L., Mange, R., Herbelin, B., Theillaud, Q., Gauthier, B., Serino, A., & Blanke, O. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197763 · Cited by 85
Finding positive meaning in memories of negative events adaptively updates memory
Speer, M. E., Ibrahim, S., Schiller, D., & Delgado, M. R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26906-4 · Cited by 81
AI & learning: A preferred future
Srinivasan, V. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100062 · Cited by 72
Mechanisms of Memory Consolidation and Transformation
Sekeres, M. J., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (2017) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45066-7_2 · Cited by 75
Chow, T. E., & Rissman, J. (2017) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13353 · Cited by 78
Remembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past
Jacques, P. L. S., Carpenter, A. C., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.015 · Cited by 66
Self-citationShifting visual perspective during memory retrieval reduces the accuracy of subsequent memories
Marcotti, P., & Jacques, P. L. S. (2017) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1329441 · Cited by 71
Boccia, M., Teghil, A., & Guariglia, C. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.003 · Cited by 65
Decomposing Parietal Memory Reactivation to Predict Consequences of Remembering
Lee, H., Samide, R., Richter, F. R., & Kuhl, B. A. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy200 · Cited by 56
Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Shao, X., Liu, W., Ye, Z., Zhuang, L., Li, Z., Loftus, E. F., & Xue, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1817925116 · Cited by 55
How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain
van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Meeter, M. (2020) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-020-0064-y · Cited by 59
Bréchet, L., Grivaz, P., Gauthier, B., & Blanke, O. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00270 · Cited by 59
Jacques, P. L. S., Montgomery, D. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.933241 · Cited by 54
Self-citationCarpenter, A. C., & Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000391 · Cited by 50
Self-citationExternalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age
Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.005 · Cited by 47
The Hippocampus and Memory Integration: Building Knowledge to Navigate Future Decisions
Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_13 · Cited by 48
Media, technology, and the sins of memory
Schacter, D. L. (2022) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2021.3 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDigitally enriched exhibitions: Perspectives from Museum professionals
Xu, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., Mao, R., & Wang, C. (2024) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104970 · Cited by 39
Neural correlates of autobiographical memory retrieval: An SDM neuroimaging meta-analysis
Shepardson, S., Dahlgren, K., & Hamann, S. B. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.006 · Cited by 37
Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors
Devitt, A. L., Monk-Fromont, E., Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.998680 · Cited by 36
Self-citationForcato, C., Bavassi, L., Pino, G. D., Fernández, R. S., Villarreal, M. F., & Pedreira, M. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151381 · Cited by 35
Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective
Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618803640 · Cited by 33
Self-citationDynamic Cortico-hippocampal Networks Underlying Memory and Cognition: The PMAT Framework
Inhoff, M. C., & Ranganath, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_18 · Cited by 41
Stawarczyk, D., Jeunehomme, O., & D’Argembeau, A. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx270 · Cited by 30
The evidence for and against reactivation-induced memory updating in humans and nonhuman animals
Jardine, K. H., Huff, A. E., Wideman, C. E., McGraw, S. D., & Winters, B. D. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104598 · Cited by 32
Memory allocation and integration in rodents and humans
Schlichting, M. L., & Frankland, P. W. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.013 · Cited by 29
Interactions between Memory and New Learning: Insights from fMRI Multivoxel Pattern Analysis
van Kesteren, M. T. R., Brown, T. I., & Wagner, A. D. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2016.00046 · Cited by 26
Retrieval of retrained and reconsolidated memories are associated with a distinct neural network
Bavassi, L., Forcato, C., Fernández, R. S., Pino, G. D., Pedreira, M. E., & Villarreal, M. F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37089-2 · Cited by 25
Thakral, P. P., Madore, K. P., Devitt, A. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000577 · Cited by 25
Self-citationChow, T. E., Westphal, A. J., & Rissman, J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.024 · Cited by 23
Storm, B. C., & Soares, J. S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.82 · Cited by 22
Devitt, A. L., Tippett, L. J., Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000129 · Cited by 24
Self-citationShao, X., Li, A., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., & Zhu, B. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38046-y · Cited by 25
The Benefits and Costs of Editing and Reviewing Photos of One’s Experiences on Subsequent Memory
Henkel, L. A., & Milliken, A. L. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.07.002 · Cited by 20
Marcotti, P., & Jacques, P. L. S. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1935972 · Cited by 20
Inter‐hemispheric connectivity in the fusiform gyrus supports memory consolidation for faces
Geiger, M. J., Tuura, R., & Klaver, P. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13197 · Cited by 20
Crossman, M., Bartl, G., Soerum, R., & Sandrini, M. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.009 · Cited by 16
Neural correlates of impaired cognitive processes underlying self-unawareness in Alzheimer's disease
Salmon, É., Meyer, F., Genon, S., Collette, F., & Bastin, C. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.10.009 · Cited by 13
Neural Overlap in Item Representations Across Episodes Impairs Context Memory
Kim, G., Norman, K. A., & Turk‐Browne, N. B. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy137 · Cited by 14
Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory
Jacques, P. L. S., & Brigard, F. D. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118332634.ch13 · Cited by 14
Siestrup, S., & Schubotz, R. I. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02047 · Cited by 14
What Happened When? Cerebral Processing of Modified Structure and Content in Episodic Cueing
Siestrup, S., Jainta, B., El-Sourani, N., Trempler, I., Wurm, M. F., Wolf, O. T., Cheng, S., & Schubotz, R. I. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01862 · Cited by 13
Ren, Y., Mehdizadeh, S. K., Leslie, G. A., & Brown, T. I. (2024) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-024-01200-0 · Cited by 13
Law and (rec)order: Updating memory for criminal events with body-worn cameras
Adams, D. J. M., Paterson, H. M., & MacDougall, H. G. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243226 · Cited by 14
Temporal dynamics of trauma memory persistence
Bonsall, M. B., & Holmes, E. A. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0108 · Cited by 11
Fan, C. L., Simpson, S., Sokolowski, H. M., & Levine, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.39 · Cited by 12
The neurocognitive basis of borrowed context information
O'Neill, M., & Diana, R. A. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.014 · Cited by 11
Age-related decline in item but not spatiotemporal associative memory for a real-world event.
Diamond, N. B., Romero, K., Jeyakumar, N., & Levine, B. (2018) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000303 · Cited by 11
Schacter, D. L., Carpenter, A. C., Devitt, A. L., & Thakral, P. P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.46 · Cited by 10
Self-citationBrunswick, C. A., Carpenter, C. M., Dennis, N. A., & Kwapis, J. L. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106195 · Cited by 10
Listeners’ effects on autobiographical memory for recent events
Grysman, A., Baime, M., & Cantor, E. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2270778 · Cited by 9
Neural correlates of retrieval-based enhancement of autobiographical memory in older adults
Xu, Q., Zhang, J., Grandjean, J., Tan, C., Subbaraju, V., Li, L., Lee, K. J., Hsieh, P., & Lim, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58076-6 · Cited by 8
PrivacyPrimer: Towards Privacy-Preserving Episodic Memory Support For Older Adults
Kandappu, T., Subbaraju, V., & Xu, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476047 · Cited by 7
Remembering a Virtual Museum Tour: Viewing Time, Memory Reactivation, and Memory Distortion
Daviddi, S., Mastroberardino, S., Jacques, P. L. S., Schacter, D. L., & Santangelo, V. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869336 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLentoor, A. G. (2023) · AIMS neuroscience · doi:10.3934/neuroscience.2023020 · Cited by 6
Orlovsky, I., Ready, R. E., Gutchess, A. H., Heideman, K., & Martins-Klein, B. (2023) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2023.2254659 · Cited by 5
Memetics and neural models of conspiracy theories
Duch, W. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100353 · Cited by 5
Preston, A. R., Molitor, R. J., Pudhiyidath, A., & Schlichting, M. L. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21074-2 · Cited by 6
Frick, P., Kendeou, P., & Schüler, A. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01586-9 · Cited by 5
Understanding episodic memory dynamics: Retrieval and updating mechanisms revealed by fMRI and tDCS
Pan, D., Lin, C., Ma, X., Wolf, O. T., Xue, G., & Li, X. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121170 · Cited by 4
Pan, D., Hoid, D., Wolf, O. T., & Li, X. (2021) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107531 · Cited by 4
Mnemonic vulnerability induced by post-activation time-dependent new-learning
Shen, F., Chen, X., Li, J., Cao, W., Ku, Y., Wu, J., Cui, Y. J., Wang, Z., Wang, H., & Kwok, S. C. (2019) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107047 · Cited by 4
Hardwicke, T. E. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/r4c32 · Cited by 4
Ford, J. H., Fields, E. C., Garcia, S. M., Cunningham, T. J., & Kensinger, E. A. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2166079 · Cited by 3
Küçüktaş, S., & Jacques, P. L. S. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1313 · Cited by 3
Fernández, R. S., Moyano, M. D., Radloff, M., Campos, J., Tano, M. C., Allegri, R., Pedreira, M. E., & Forcato, C. (2017) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.014 · Cited by 3
Jacques, P. L. S., & Marcotti, P. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/x6uzp · Cited by 3
Temporal context-guided memory capabilities in rodents
Slater, B., Petkov, C. I., & Easton, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95410-2 · Cited by 2
Predicting Event Memorability from Contextual Visual Semantics
Xu, Q., Fang, F., del Molino, A. G., Subbaraju, V., & Lim, J. (2021) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2
Active Recognition Attempts Induce Updating of Face MemoriesPreprint
Plummer, M., Hellerstedt, R., Gibson, S. J., Simons, J. S., & Bergström, Z. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/63qnj · Cited by 2
Social Support for Causal Coherence
Grysman, A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009492140.010 · Cited by 1
Targeting memory of embedded positive verbal content indirectly modulates negative visual memory
Kozak, S., Markovits, T., Hacohen, N., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Censor, N. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113586 · Cited by 1
Reminder-dependent alterations in long-term declarative memory expression
Tay, K. R., Bolt, F., Wong, H. T., Vasileva, S. S., & Lee, J. L. C. (2023) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107858 · Cited by 1
Does Technology-Mediated Memory Differ from Human-Mediated Memory?
Grysman, A. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384137 · Cited by 1
Saive, A.-L. (2015) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5358e3c3z90ccz4228z889fz080b02a87254 · Cited by 1
Det ligger i detaljerna! - Hur varierad inkodning leder till bristande episodiskt minne
Dohm-Hansen, S. (2014) · Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)
Source Memory Failures: Comparing Source Misattribution to Sources of False Memories
O'Neill, M. (2015) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Soares, J. S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384139
Sanders, D. M. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192882578.003.0003
Self-citationPreston, A. R., Molitor, R. J., Pudhiyidath, A., & Schlichting, M. L. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15754-7.00094-8
Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Z., & Luo, J. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70381 · Cited by 1
How the Environment of Autobiographical Memory Shapes the Life Story
Camia, C., & Bohn, A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009492140.006
Sandrini, M., Bartl, G., & Crossman, M. (2018) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/j4xq6
Emotional modulation of visual cortical reactivation during true and false memoriesPreprint
Hofstetter, C., Riegel, M., Igloi, K., Pichon, A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.01.08.694977
Hippocampal plasticity underlying learning and memory processes in healthy and diseased conditions
Petsophonsakul, P. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5fdda64ez871dz42c8za517zf44c3618705e
Leone, G. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1f0d56dez2a98z4e3azaad5z8774b332a9b5
How self-reference enhances susceptibility to misinformation: An event-related potentials study
Sun, M., & Wang, J. (2026) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2026.109277
Old mice fail to integrate a memory update into an existing hippocampal engramPreprint
Brunswick, C. A., Defina, A. G., Wood, T. A., Baldwin, D. J., McKenna, A. R., Sicher, A. R., Marwaha, C., Brockway, D. F., Murakami, S., Pifer, G. C., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.22.733721
Antypa, D., Vuilleumier, P. O., & Rimmele, U. (2026) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-026-02505-z
Metadata
- Authors
- St. Jacques, P. L., Olm, C., & Schacter, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology and
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-11-04
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 19671-19678
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3856820
- OpenAlex
- W2045390639
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG038079, F32AG038079)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 060941, R01MH060941)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory reactivation, false memory, memory distortion, retrosplenial cortex, subsequent memory, event memory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
