Cited by 225Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Resistance to forgetting associated with hippocampus-mediated reactivation during new learning

Open access
Kuhl, Brice A, Shah, Arpeet T, DuBrow, Sarah, Wagner, Anthony D·2010·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

One of the reasons why we forget past experiences is because we acquire new memories in the interim. Although the hippocampus is thought to be important for acquiring and retaining memories, there is little evidence linking neural operations during new learning to the forgetting (or remembering) of earlier events. We found that, during the encoding of new memories, responses in the human hippocampus are predictive of the retention of memories for previously experienced, overlapping events. This brain-behavior relationship is evident in neural responses to individual events and in differences across individuals. We found that the hippocampus accomplishes this function by reactivating older memories as new memories are formed; in this case, reactivating neural responses that represented monetary rewards associated with older memories. These data reveal a fundamental mechanism by which the hippocampus tempers the forgetting of older memories as newer memories are acquired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2498

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memories transferred to neocortical storage sites become less dependent on the hippocampus, which is the primary site where newly encoded memories can overlay and disrupt previously encoded older representations (retroactive interference).

    “Thereby these memories become less dependent on hippocampus as the primary site where newly encoded memories can overlay and disrupt previously encoded older representation, i.e. a process known as retroactive interference (Kuhl, Shah, DuBrow, & Wagner 2010).”

    From System consolidation of memory during sleep (2012) · cites this paper as Kuhl, Shah, DuBrow, & Wagner 2010

    The Abstract says that new, overlapping learning can interfere with older memories, supporting the claim’s account of retroactive interference. But it does not say that memories become less hippocampus-dependent after transfer to neocortex or that the hippocampus is the primary site where new memories disrupt old ones. The Discussion instead emphasizes hippocampal reactivation as a way to reduce such forgetting. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using an interference A-B A-C paradigm, Kuhl et al. observed distinct hippocampal activation during learning of new A-C object associations, which was predictive for later remembering the first-learned A-B associations, suggesting that reactivation of old associations during new learning prevented forgetting.

    “Using an interference A-B A-C paradigm, Kuhl et al. ( 674) observed distinct hippocampal activation during learning of the new A-C object associations (interfering with the first learned A-B associations), which was predictive for later remembering the first-learned A-B associations, suggesting that reactivation of old associations during new learning prevented forgetting.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [674]

  • The hippocampus and vmPFC support flexible memory processes that allow memories to be combined and used in novel ways and contribute to memory updating.

    “A related line of research suggests that the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) support flexible memory processes that allow memories to be combined and used in novel ways, and that contribute to memory updating.”
  • There is conflicting evidence regarding the nature of awake reactivation, with some studies showing that reactivation enhances or even protects memory from new information and other studies indicating that reactivation incorporates new information into memory.

    “However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the nature of awake reactivation, with some studies showing that reactivation enhances or even protects memory from new information (54, 64, 65) and other studies indicating that reactivation incorporates new information into memory (49, 65–67).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhl, B. A., Shah, A. T., DuBrow, S., & Wagner, A. D.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kuhl, Brice A
  • Wagner, Anthony D
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2010-02-28
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
501-506
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2075779898
Cited by
225
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh080309-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH080309, 5R01MH080309)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
hippocampus, memory reactivation, forgetting, memory encoding, memory retention, overlapping events, neural representations, monetary rewards, individual differences, memory interference
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review