Cited by 583Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major Depression

Altered Striatal Activation Predicting Real-World Positive Affect in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Forbes, Erika E., Hariri, Ahmad R., Martin, Samantha L., Silk, Jennifer S., Moyles, Donna L., Fisher, Patrick M., Brown, Sarah M., Ryan, Neal D. +3 more·2009·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alterations in reward-related brain function and phenomenological aspects of positive affect are increasingly examined in the development of major depressive disorder. The authors tested differences in reward-related brain function in healthy and depressed adolescents, and the authors examined direct links between reward-related brain function and positive mood that occurred in real-world contexts. METHOD: Fifteen adolescents with major depressive disorder and 28 adolescents with no history of psychiatric disorder, ages 8-17 years, completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging guessing task involving monetary reward. Participants also reported their subjective positive affect in natural environments during a 4-day cell-phone-based ecological momentary assessment. RESULTS: Adolescents with major depressive disorder exhibited less striatal response than healthy comparison adolescents during reward anticipation and reward outcome, but more response in dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex. Diminished activation in a caudate region associated with this depression group difference was correlated with lower subjective positive affect in natural environments, particularly within the depressed group. CONCLUSIONS: Results support models of altered reward processing and related positive affect in young people with major depressive disorder and indicate that depressed adolescents' brain response to monetary reward is related to their affective experience in natural environments. Additionally, these results suggest that reward-processing paradigms capture brain function relevant to real-world positive affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081336

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across studies, over-recruitment of prefrontal cortex regions, including medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, during reward processing has been interpreted as suggesting over-compensation for reduced striatal responses to rewards.

    “Across studies, over-recruitment of PFC regions (mPFC, dlPFC) during reward processing has been interpreted as suggesting over-compensation for reduced striatal responses to rewards [104, 111, 112].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a card-guessing task, depressed adolescents had potentiated mPFC (BA10) activation coupled with blunted ventral striatal activation to rewards.

    “In a study using a card-guessing task, depressed adolescents had potentiated mPFC (BA10) activation (coupled with blunted ventral striatal activation) to rewards [111].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Method (Measures) describes a card-guessing reward task, and the Results (Depression-Related Differences in Neural Response to Reward) report greater medial BA10 activation during reward outcome alongside reduced caudate activation in depressed adolescents. The paper identifies the reduced-response region as the caudate, not specifically the ventral striatum; the Methods say the striatal region of interest encompassed both ventral striatum and adjacent caudate. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lower striatal and higher prefrontal responses to reward anticipation and outcome tracked with less daily positive affect and more depression in both typical and depressed adolescents.

    “diminished striatal (and heightened prefrontal) responses to reward anticipation and outcome were associated with reports of lower daily positive affect and higher depression in both typically-developing and depressed adolescents [50,51].”
  • In adolescents, more depressive symptoms and less daily positive affect have been linked to stronger PFC responses.

    “greater depressive symptoms and lower daily positive affect have been associated with heightened PFC responses in adolescence [50,51].”
  • Depression is associated with altered neural activity in the ventral striatum, which includes the nucleus accumbens.

    “depression has been associated with altered neural activity in the ventral striatum (Epstein et al., 2006; Eshel and Roiser, 2010; Forbes et al., 2009; Monk et al., 2008.; Pizzagalli et al., 2009; Price and Drevets, 2010; Teicher et al., 2009), which includes the nucleus accumbens (NAcc)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Keedwell PA Andrew C Williams SC Brammer MJ Phillips ML The neural correlates of anhedonia in major depressive disorder Biol Psychiatry 2005 58 843 853 16043128

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes, E. E., Hariri, A. R., Martin, S. L., Silk, J. S., Moyles, D. L., Fisher, P. M., Brown, S. M., Ryan, N. D., Birmaher, B., Axelson, D. A., & Dahl, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-01
Volume
166
Issue
1
Pages
64-73
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2138309161
Cited by
582
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH041712, P01 MH 41712, R24MH067346, K01MH072837, K01MH074769)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
adolescent major depressive disorder, striatal activation, reward processing, positive affect, caudate nucleus, monetary rewards, reward anticipation, reward outcome, prefrontal cortex, ecological momentary assessment, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Age Factors, Caudate Nucleus, Child, Corpus Striatum, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Neurons, Oxygen, Prognosis, Reward, Social Environment, Prefrontal Cortex, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review