Cited by 347Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Oligotyping analysis of the human oral microbiome

Open access
Eren, A. Murat, Borisy, Gary G., Huse, Susan M., Mark Welch, Jessica L.·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The human body, including the mouth, is home to a diverse assemblage of microbial organisms. Although high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes provides enormous amounts of census data, accurate identification of taxa in these large datasets remains problematic because widely used computational approaches do not resolve closely related but distinct organisms. We used a computational approach that relies on information theory to reanalyze the human oral microbiome. This analysis revealed organisms differing by as little as a single rRNA nucleotide, with dramatically different distributions across habitats or individuals. Our information theory-based approach in combination with habitat analysis demonstrates the potential to deconstruct entire microbiomes, detect previously unrecognized diversity, and provide deep insight into microbial communities in health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1409644111

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eren, A. M., Borisy, G. G., Huse, S. M., & Mark Welch, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • The Forsyth Institute (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-06-25
Volume
111
Issue
28
Pages
E2875-84
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1565875270
Cited by
347
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8
FWCI
33.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (UH2DK083993, UH3DK083993, DK083993)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 022586, R01DE022586)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
oligotyping, oral microbiota, 16S rRNA gene, Shannon entropy, taxonomic resolution, dental plaque, gingiva, buccal mucosa, microbial diversity, Human Microbiome Project
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bacteria, Female, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, Male, Mouth Mucosa, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Genes, rRNA, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review