The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prenatal social disadvantage is associated with alterations in functional networks at birth
Abstract
Childhood exposure to social disadvantage is a major risk factor for psychiatric disorders and poor developmental, educational, and occupational outcomes, presumably because adverse exposures alter the neurodevelopmental processes that contribute to risk trajectories. Yet, given the limited social mobility in the United States and other countries, childhood social disadvantage is frequently preceded by maternal social disadvantage during pregnancy, potentially altering fetal brain development during a period of high neuroplasticity through hormonal, microbiome, epigenetic, and immune factors that cross the placenta and fetal blood–brain barrier. The current study examines prenatal social disadvantage to determine whether these exposures in utero are associated with alterations in functional brain networks as early as birth. As part of the Early Life Adversity and Biological Embedding study, mothers were recruited during pregnancy, prenatal social disadvantage was assessed across trimesters, and their healthy, full-term offspring were imaged using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging during the first weeks of life. Multivariate machine learning methods revealed that neonatal functional connectivity (FC) varied as a function of prenatal exposure to social disadvantage (n = 261, R = 0.43, R 2 = 0.18), with validation in an independent sample. Alterations in FC associated with prenatal social disadvantage occurred brain-wide and were most pronounced in association networks (fronto-parietal, ventral attention, dorsal attention) and the somatomotor network. Amygdala FC was altered at birth, with a pattern shared across subcortical structures. These findings provide critical insights into how early in development functional networks begin to diverge in the context of social disadvantage and elucidate the functional networks that are most impacted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In full-term newborns, resting-state fMRI studies demonstrate that maternal exposures during pregnancy, including intergenerational transmission of racism-related trauma, social disadvantage, and prenatal drug exposure, are associated with altered neonatal functional brain connectivity at birth.[27][28][29]”
From Environmental roots of neonatal health: how social and structural exposures shape early-life outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible — The Neighborhood Atlas
Kind, A. J. H., & Buckingham, W. R. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1802313 · Cited by 3,310
Joëls, M., & Baram, T. Z. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2632 · Cited by 1,521
Aerobic glycolysis in the human brain is associated with development and neotenous gene expression
Goyal, M. S., Hawrylycz, M., Miller, J. A., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2014) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.020 · Cited by 459 · cited 1×
“Because metabolic rates vary across the brain [e.g., increased aerobic glycolysis in the default mode network (DMN)] ( 39 ), stress hormone - induced changes in energy demand ( 40 ) may contribute to patterns of intrinsic activity that differ by functional network.”
Self-citationThe restless brain: How intrinsic activity organizes brain function
Raichle, M. E. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0172 · Cited by 433
Self-citationSlavich, G. M., & Shields, G. S. (2018) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000534 · Cited by 268 · cited 2×
“The following maternal measures were included in the psychosocial stress variable: Perceived stress scale (49) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (50) in each trimester, Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) (51), and Everyday Discrimination Scale (52).”
Data leakage inflates prediction performance in connectome-based machine learning models
Rosenblatt, M., Tejavibulya, L., Jiang, R., Noble, S., & Scheinost, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46150-w · Cited by 236
Graham, A. M., Rasmussen, J. M., Entringer, S., Ben Ward, E., Rudolph, M. D., Gilmore, J. H., Styner, M., Wadhwa, P. D., Fair, D. A., & Buss, C. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.06.023 · Cited by 203
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1542/neo.20-12-e686 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-1372-5_13 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2204135119 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1503960112 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2019128118 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118466 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhac202 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhac242 · DOI
- 10.1159/000507616 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15081014 · DOI
- 10.1093/texcom/tgaa033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101025 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41398-021-01704-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn2201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13504850701720197 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0272155 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41372-023-01643-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0190-7409(95)00011-Z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.22532 · DOI
- 10.1111/aji.13489 · DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines9091092 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.04.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954579420000887 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954579412000764 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2007.08.017 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01014 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1201295109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1910842117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.001 · DOI
- S. E. Marshall “The Cannabis use disorder identification test-revised (CUDIT-R): Categorisation and interpretation” Dissertation University of Tasmania (2013).
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16406 · DOI
- 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/135910539700200305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a603bb · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-020-61326-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhq035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/bhu239 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.038 · DOI
Cited by
Nawaz, K., Babata, K., Scheid, L., Bitar, L., Ortiz, N. V., Kota, S., & Chalak, L. F. (2026) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-026-05139-5 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, A. N., Triplett, R. L., Bernardez, L. M., Tooley, U. A., Herzberg, M. P., Lean, R. E., Kaplan, S., Meyer, D., Kenley, J. K., Alexopoulos, D., Losielle, D., Latham, A., Smyser, T. A., Agrawal, A., Shimony, J. S., Jackson, J. J., Miller, J. P., Raichle, M. E., Warner, B. B., Rogers, C. E., Sylvester, C. M., Barch, D. M., Luby, J. L., & Smyser, C. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2024-12-02
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 50
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Funders
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH121877, R01 MH113570, R01 MH113883, T32 GR0029379)
- HHS | NIH | NIDA | National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (R01 DA046224)
- BCM | Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (P50 HD103525, R01 MH090786)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.