Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How livestreaming increases product sales: role of trust transfer and elaboration likelihood model

Chen, Chun-Der, Zhao, Qun, Wang, Jin-Long·2022·Behaviour & Information Technology
DOI 10.1080/0144929x.2020.1827457
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With the ever-increasing popularity of livestreaming commerce, understanding how livestreaming contributes to online consumption becomes crucial to social commerce. However, studies pertain to livestreaming commerce are still at a nascent stage. Based on the elaboration likelihood model and trust transfer theory, we aim to examine the underlying mechanism of how livestreaming influences consumers’ trust building and purchasing intention. The determinants, process and consequences of trust are discussed. More than 545 experienced livestreaming commerce users participated in this study in China. Our findings show two different routes through which consumers’ trust can be built and affect their purchase intention and willingness to pay more. We also verify the trust transfer effect exists from trust in the streamer to trust in product in livestreaming commerce. We hope this study will bring more insight into trust and the underlying mechanism of how livestreaming increases product sales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2020.1827457

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Aaker D. A., 1991, Managing Brand Equity
  2. 10.1108/08858620910986712 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cai, J., and D. Y. Wohn. 2019. “Live streaming commerce: Uses and gratifications approach to understanding consumers’ motivations.” In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/mar.20334 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chen, C., Y. Hu, Y. Lu, and Y. Hong. 2019. “Everyone can be a Star: Quantifying grassroots online sellers’ live streaming effects on product sales.” In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA. · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chinomona R., 2013, Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 4, 463
  11. 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0608 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/0149206312439327 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/23044042 · DOI
  14. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00140-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s10660-016-9217-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keller K. L., 2003, Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity
  19. 10.1016/j.im.2006.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1109/TEM.2007.906851 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1161345.1161359 · DOI
  22. Li, B., F. Hou, Z. Guan, and A.Y.L. Chong. 2018a. “What drives people to purchase virtual gifts in live streaming? The mediating role of flow.” In Proceeding of Twenty-Second Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Japan, 2018.
  23. Li D., 2018, Materials & Continua, 55, 137
  24. 10.1016/j.im.2018.07.002 · DOI
  25. 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/002224299405800302 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Petty R. E., 1981, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
  29. Petty R. E., 1984, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668
  30. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.4018/irmj.2007100104 · DOI
  32. 10.1108/IntR-10-2018-0447 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Smith S., 2002, Managing the Customer Experience: Turning Customers Into Advocates
  34. 10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/01449290500330398 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sun, Y., X. Shao, K. Nie, Y. Qi, and Y. Guo. 2018. “Why Do Customers Buy Products on Social Commerce Platform? A Study from Affordance Theory.” In Proceedings of the 18nd Interantional Conference on Eletronic Business, 731–738, Guilin, China
  37. 10.2307/1251686 · doi:10.2307/1251686
  38. 10.1287/isre.1050.0058 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.004 · doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.004
  40. 10.1002/mar.20375 · DOI
  41. 10.2307/3250981 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1748895 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1080/14783363.2013.776770 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/mar.10110 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.024 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.038 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.007 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.021 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C.-D., Zhao, Q., & Wang, J.-L.
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-09-29
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
558-573
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
DOI
10.1080/0144929x.2020.1827457
OpenAlex
W3091504604
Cited by
205
References
20
FWCI
26.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.