The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Abstract
The heated controversy over “citizen participation,” “citizen control”, and “maximum feasible involvement of the poor,” has been waged largely in terms of exacerbated rhetoric and misleading euphemisms. To encourage a more enlightened dialogue, a typology of citizen participation is offered using examples from three federal social programs: urban renewal, anti-poverty, and Model Cities. The typology, which is designed to be provocative, is arranged in a ladder pattern with each rung corresponding to the extent of citizens' power in determining the plan and/or program.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Her typology clearly demonstrated that not all participation is of equal value and that, at the time of her original authorship, tokenism dominated as the method through which the majority of citizens most likely participated in the policy process.”
From The Value of a Communitarian Approach to Public Library Board Governance: Rejecting Current Neoliberal Practice / La valeur d’une approche communautariste de la gouvernance du conseil d’administration d’une bibliothèque publique : Le rejet de la pratique néolibérale actuelle (2012) · cites this paper as Arnstein (1969)
In the citing paper
“The classical example of the ladder model is Hart's Ladder of Children's Participation, 48 which was published in 1992 and based on Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation first published in 1969. 87”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [87]
In the citing paper
“The strengthening democracy rationale flows from participatory and deliberative theories that perceive democracy as a process of building civic capital and stronger democratic institutions (Arnstein, 1969; B. R. Barber, 2004; Pateman, 1970).”
From Between promise and practice: a scoping review of the democratic outcomes of youth participation in local governance (2026) · cites this paper as Arnstein, 1969
In the citing paper
“This aligns with Arnstein ' s (1969) and Hart ' s (1992) foundational work on participation ladders and extends them by highlighting how participation outcomes are shaped by context and vary across dimensions”
From Between promise and practice: a scoping review of the democratic outcomes of youth participation in local governance (2026) · cites this paper as Arnstein ' s (1969)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,034 of 1,034
Pereira, Â. G., Rinaudo, J.-D., Jeffrey, P., Blasques, J., Quintana, S. C., Courtois, N., Funtowicz, S., & Petit, V. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management · doi:10.1142/s1464333203001383 · Cited by 66
Socio-materiality of trust: co-design with a resource limited community organisation
Clarke, R. E., Briggs, J., Armstrong, A., MacDonald, A., Vines, J., Flynn, E., & Salt, K. (2021) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349 · Cited by 63
Wigfield, A., Turner, R., Alden, S., Green, M., & Karania, V. K. (2022) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s147474642000055x · Cited by 61
Looking through a policy window with tinted glasses: Setting the agenda for U.S. AI policy
Schiff, D. S. (2023) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12535 · Cited by 55
Farming without a recipe: Wisconsin graziers and new directions for agricultural science
Lyon, A., Bell, M. M., Gratton, C., & Jackson, R. (2011) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.002 · Cited by 54
Active Patient Participation in the Development of an Online Intervention
van Bruinessen, I. R., van Weel-Baumgarten, E. M., Snippe, H. W., Gouw, H., Zijlstra, J. M., & van Dulmen, S. (2014) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.3695 · Cited by 43
Inclusion of Residual Tissue in Biobanks: Opt-In or Opt-Out?
Giesbertz, N. A. A., Bredenoord, A. L., & van Delden, J. J. M. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001373 · Cited by 48
Patient involvement and the politics of methodology
Kreindler, S. A. (2009) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00062.x · Cited by 47
Hafer, J. A., & Ran, B. (2016) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1202080 · Cited by 47
Barandiaran, X. E., Calleja-López, A., Monterde, A., & Romero, C. (2024) · SpringerBriefs in Political Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50784-7 · Cited by 44
Lopes, K. M. G., Macadar, M. A., & Luciano, E. M. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2018-0081 · Cited by 42
Shybalkina, I. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12754 · Cited by 42
Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities
Hosseini, M., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Holmes, K., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00337 · Cited by 40
Sung, H.-Y., Hepworth, M., & Ragsdell, G. (2013) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000612448205 · Cited by 40
Who needs democracy if we can pick our favorite girl?Super Girl as media spectacle
Meng, B. (2009) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750903208996 · Cited by 36
Las familias en el corazón de la educación inclusiva
Simón Rueda, C., & Barrios Fernández, Á. (2019) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.48.1.2019.51-58 · Cited by 36
Dispositifs participatifs et asymétries de pouvoir : expliciter et interroger les positionnements
Barnaud, C., d’Aquino, P., Daré, W., & Mathevet, R. (2017) · Participations · doi:10.3917/parti.016.0137 · Cited by 37
A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research
Sanchez, S., Thorburn, R., Rea, M., Kaufman, P., Schwartz, R., Selby, P., & Chaiton, M. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13975 · Cited by 35
Design multiple: How different configurations of participation matter in design practice
Fischer, B., Östlund, B., & Peine, A. (2021) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2021.101016 · Cited by 31
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.12920 · Cited by 29
Krüger, M., Weibert, A., de Castro Leal, D., Randall, D., & Wulf, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476050 · Cited by 23
Noordman, J., Driesenaar, J. A., van Bruinessen, I. R., & van Dulmen, S. (2017) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2017.05.002 · Cited by 15
Democratic Participation: A Critical Element of Precautionary Public Health Decision-Making
Tickner, J. A. (2001) · NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy · doi:10.2190/en1t-f9a1-lv0p-bllr · Cited by 15
Stapleton, A., & Mayock, P. (2023) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2021.2008463 · Cited by 12
Stakeholder engagement in the governance of marine migratory species: barriers and building blocks
Miller, R., Marsh, H., Benham, C., & Hamann, M. (2020) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr01049 · Cited by 12
Empowerment evaluation applied to public health practice
Carr, S. M., Lhussier, M., Wilkinson, J., & Gleadhill, S. (2008) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581590701499327 · Cited by 10
Sapic, T., Runesson, U., & Smith, M. A. (. (2009) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc85789-5 · Cited by 5
Irwin, B. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science · doi:10.1353/ils.2012.0002 · Cited by 4
Ramos, F., Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2026) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108738 · Cited by 12
Biernetzky, O. A., Thyrian, J. R., Boekholt, M., Berndt, M., Hoffmann, W., Teipel, S. J., & Kilimann, I. (2025) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/59942 · Cited by 4
Building models, building capacity: A review of participatory machine learning for HIV prevention
Sendak, M., Young, M., Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Kelsey, C., O’Neal, C., Jagneaux, T., Wilbright, W., Couk, J., Lim, S., et al. (2025) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003862 · Cited by 2
Siloed in breaking silos: A case study of interdisciplinary curriculum (mis)alignment
Chew, J. Y. (2021) · LearnxDesign 2021: Engaging with challenges in design education · doi:10.21606/drs_lxd2021.02.231 · Cited by 1
Sørensen, A. S. (2021) · Experimental Museology · doi:10.4324/9780367808433-11-15
Lowers, V., Stanley, M., Hennessy, J., Morgan, E., Horsley, R., Vithlani, J., & Harris, R. V. (2026) · Research involvement and engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-026-00857-w
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnstein, S. R.
- Corresponding author
- Arnstein, Sherry R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Institute of Planners
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1969-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 216-224
- ISSN
- 0002-8991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008251417
- Cited by
- 17,064
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1187 · 2025: 1177 · 2024: 1134 · 2023: 1123 · 2022: 1080 · 2021: 1124 · 2020: 1117 · 2019: 1065 · 2018: 817 · 2017: 750 · 2016: 728 · 2015: 691 · 2014: 681 · 2013: 618 · 2012: 569
- FWCI
- 103.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Institute of Planners (publishedVersion)
- BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Keywords
- citizen participation, citizen control, typology of participation, urban regeneration, anti-poverty policy, Model Cities program, federal social programs, poor people, citizen power, participatory planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
