CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Gender, Feminism, and MediaCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexting, consent and young people's ethics: Beyond Megan's Story

Albury, Kath, Crawford, Kate·2012·Continuum
DOI 10.1080/10304312.2012.665840
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article contrasts the Megan's Story campaign, a recent Australian media and policy response to sexting (the act of taking and transmitting naked or semi-naked pictures via mobile phones) with interview responses drawn from an Australian study that has asked young people about mobiles and sexting. It considers local and international responses to sexting as ‘child pornography,’ raising questions about the adequacy and appropriateness of criminalizing young people's sexual self-representation and communication. Based on young people's responses to sexting, the authors argue that there is an emerging ethics around the issue of consent being developed by young people. However, considerations of consent cannot be accounted for by the laws as they are presently framed, as under-18-year-olds currently are not allowed to consent to any form of sexting. This disconnection between the law and uses of technology by consenting teenagers generates problems both for policy, education and legal systems. This paper suggests a response that would recognize the seriousness of incidents of bullying, harassment or abuse, and would also take into account the meaning that sexting has for young people in specific contexts and cultures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10304312.2012.665840

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Albury , K. , Funnell , N. and Noonan , E. 2010 . “ The politics of sexting: Young people, self- representation and citizenship ” . In Media democracy and change:Refereed proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Annual Conference Edited by: McCallum , K. Canberra, July 7–9. ISBN 987-1-74088-319-1. http://www.anzca.net/latest-conference-report/anzca10proceedings.html (accessed January 30, 2011)
  2. Carmody , M. 2008 . Sex and ethics: Young people and ethical sex , South Yarra : Palgrave .
  3. Crawford K. and G. Goggin. 2011. Generation disconnections: Youth culture and mobile communication in The Mobile Communication Research Series: Volume II Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together or Tearing Us Apart? ed. Rich Ling and Scott Campbell pp. 249–71. Piscataway NJ: Transaction Publishers
  4. Knowledge Networks. 2009. MTV-Associated Press Digital Abuse Survey. http://www.athinline.org/about (accessed January 12 2011)
  5. Pew Research Centre. 2010. Teens adults and sexting: Data on sending and receiving sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude photos by America. Pew Internet Project conference paper given at AOIR 2010 October 23. http://www.pewinternet.org/Presentations/2010/Oct/Teens-Adults-and-Sexting.aspx (accessed January 15 2011)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Albury, K., & Crawford, K.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Albury, Kath
ORCID
Venue
Continuum
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-05-18
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
463-473
ISSN
  • 1030-4312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3666
DOI
10.1080/10304312.2012.665840
OpenAlex
W2085408300
Cited by
236
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Continuum (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
sexting, consent, youth, ethics, child pornography, criminalization, mobile devices, sexual harassment, bullying, youth policy, law and technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review