Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proactive vitality management in the work context: development and validation of a new instrument

Op den Kamp, Emma M., Tims, Maria, Bakker, Arnold B., Demerouti, Evangelia·2018·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2018.1483915

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 1 Results of the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MLCFA) on the eight daily PVM items. All reported values are standardized.
Figure 1 Results of the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MLCFA) on the eight daily PVM items. All reported values are standardized.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Arbuckle J. L., 2013, Mount Pleasant, SC
  2. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/a0012815 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/job.4030140202 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/job.731 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/h0046016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.003 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00221.x · DOI
  12. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000475 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0146167211435795 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/1359432X.2011.576009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Demerouti E., 2003, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 296
  16. 10.1111/joop.12048 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fritz C., 2011, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 28
  20. 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1080/19416520903047327 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1134491 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/apl0000045 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/job.571 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_3 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/job.2084 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.005 · DOI
  31. McNair D. M., 1971, Profile of mood states manual
  32. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x · DOI
  33. Meijman T. F, 1998, Handbook of work and organizational psychology, 2, 5
  34. Mitchell M. L., 2012, Research design explained. Wadsworth
  35. Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide
  36. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000009 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0149206310363732 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/0013164405282471 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Shirom A., 2004, Research in organizational stress and well-being, 3, 135
  43. 10.1037/a0032141 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1108/JMP-05-2012-0148 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007 · DOI
  46. Trougakos J. P., 2009, Current Perspectives on Job–Stress Recovery: Research in Occupational Stress and Wellbeing, 7, 37, 10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007005 · DOI
  47. Unsworth K. L., 2003, The new workplace: A guide to the human impact of modern working practices
  48. 10.1177/014920639101700305 · DOI
  49. 10.5465/amr.2001.4378011 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.005 · DOI
  51. 10.2307/3069410 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22004-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
Op den Kamp, E. M., Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam, Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • VU Amsterdam, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management and Organization, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • TU Eindhoven, Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Department of Human Performance Management, the Netherlands
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
493-505
ISSN
  • 1359-432X
  • 1464-0643
Cited by
85
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review