Cited by 128Gut microbiota and healthAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Fecal microbiota variation across the lifespan of the healthy laboratory rat

Open access
Flemer, Burkhardt, Gaci, Nadia, Borrel, Guillaume, Sanderson, Ian R., Chaudhary, Prem P., Tottey, William, O'Toole, Paul W., Brugère, Jean-François·2017·Gut Microbes

Abstract

Laboratory rats are commonly used in life science research as a model for human biology and disease, but the composition and development of their gut microbiota during life is poorly understood. We determined the fecal microbiota composition of healthy Sprague Dawley laboratory rats from 3 weeks to 2 y of age, kept under controlled environmental and dietary conditions. Additionally, we determined fecal short-chain fatty acid profiles, and we compared the rat fecal microbiota with that of mice and humans. Gut microbiota and to a lesser extent SCFAs profiles separated rats into 3 different clusters according to age: before weaning, first year of life (12- to 26-week-old animals) and second year of life (52- to 104-week-old). A core of 46 bacterial species was present in all rats but its members' relative abundance progressively decreased with age. This was accompanied by an increase of microbiota α-diversity, likely due to the acquisition of environmental microorganisms during the lifespan. Contrastingly, the functional profile of the microbiota across animal species became more similar upon aging. Lastly, the microbiota of rats and mice were most similar to each other but at the same time the microbiota profile of rats was more similar to that of humans than was the microbiota profile of mice. These data offer an explanation as to why germ-free rats are more efficient recipients and retainers of human microbiota than mice. Furthermore, experimental design should take into account dynamic changes in the microbiota of model animals considering that their changing gut microbiota interacts with their physiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19490976.2017.1334033

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phenomenon of age-related gut microbiota change exists simultaneously in species such as Drosophila, fish, mice, rats, and humans.

    “Moreover, this phenomenon exists simultaneously in species such as Drosophila,219 fish,220 mice,221 rats,222 and humans.223”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flemer, B., Gaci, N., Borrel, G., Sanderson, I. R., Chaudhary, P. P., Tottey, W., O'Toole, P. W., & Brugère, J.-F.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • School of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Ireland
Corresponding author
Brugère, Jean-François
Venue
Gut Microbes
Published
2017-06-06
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
428-439
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
OpenAlex
W2624151437
Cited by
128
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/, 12/RC/2273, 12/RC/, SFI/12/RC/2273.)
  • APC Microbiome Institute (SFI/12/RC/2273)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, aging, lifespan, laboratory rats, short-chain fatty acids, alpha diversity, core microbiome, germ-free rats, microbiota transfer
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Feces, Humans, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review