The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 55 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis
Open accessAbstract
Backgroud Dental fluorosis is a prevalent endemic condition, yet its impact on the oral microbiota structure and resistance in children remains understudied.Objective To assess the microbial composition, diversity, functional pathways and co-occurrence patterns among urinary fluoride (UF), bacterial taxa and antibiotic resistance genes in relation to fluorosis severity. Design: Metagenomic analysis of dental plaque was conducted on 96 school-aged children, who were grouped into normal, dubious, very mild, mild, moderate and severe base on fluorosis severity.Results Microbial diversity increased with fluorosis severity. Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed a reduced relative abundance of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and genetic information processing in moderate and severe groups. Network analysis revealed positive correlations among Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, UF levels and GRD33_1 (a carbapenem resistance gene).Conclusions These findings highlight severity-dependent shifts in the oral microbiota and resistance, warranting further investigation into fluoride's public health implications.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 96 school-aged children, dental fluorosis severity was associated with increased oral microbial alpha diversity and enrichment of taxa such as Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Rothia dentocariosa in moderate/severe groups. Network analysis linked urinary fluoride, Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, and the carbapenem resistance gene GRD33_1, suggesting severity-dependent microbiota and resistance shifts.
Key findings
- Alpha diversity increased with fluorosis severity across taxonomic levels by Shannon and Simpson indices (P < 0.05), with the most pronounced differences between Normal vs Moderate and Normal vs Severe groups.
- Moderate and severe groups were significantly enriched for Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Rothia dentocariosa; Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus pneumoniae were enriched in the normal group, while Neisseria sicca and Neisseria mucosa were more abundant in very mild and mild groups, respectively.
- KEGG/STAMP analyses showed multiple key pathways—DNA replication proteins, two-component system, ABC transporters, and chaperones—were significantly lower in moderate and severe groups compared with normal and mild groups (P < 0.05); the abstract reports reduced relative abundance of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and genetic information processing in moderate and severe groups.
- Co-occurrence networks showed positive correlations among urinary fluoride (UF), Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, and GRD33_1; Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 co-occurred with 24 ARGs (e.g., tetM, patB, mexY, OXA-125), and GRD33_1 correlated with Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Rothia dentocariosa.
Methods
- Metagenomic analysis of dental plaque from 96 children aged 8–12 years (mean 10.3; 49 female/47 male) in Fengxian County, Xuzhou, Jiangsu; grouped by Dean’s classification: normal n = 19, dubious n = 10, very mild n = 16, mild n = 16, moderate n = 17, severe n = 18. UF was measured by ion-selective electrode.
- Shotgun metagenomic sequencing on Illumina NovaSeq with paired-end 150 bp; taxonomic classification used Kraken2 and Bracken; assembly used MEGAHIT; functional annotation used KofamKOALA/KEGG and eggNOG-mapper/COG; ARGs were identified with RGI against CARD.
- Statistical analyses in R included alpha diversity by Wilcoxon rank-sum test, beta diversity by Bray–Curtis dissimilarity with PCA/NMDS/ANOSIM, differential abundance by STAMP, LEfSe, and MetaStat, and Spearman correlation networks among UF, bacterial taxa, and ARGs visualized in Cytoscape.
Limitations
- Stated: sample sizes were unbalanced across severity groups, with only 10 participants in the dubious group, reducing statistical power and increasing type II error risk; the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; the questionnaire’s highest frequency category limits distinguishing higher exposure levels; single spot urinary UF reflects recent exposure only; and unmeasured confounders such as dietary fluoride intake and fluoride-containing toothpaste use frequency/amount could not be fully adjusted.
- Stated/evident: all correlation coefficients had absolute rho values ≤ 0.4, so associations are weak and not indicative of causal relationships; metagenomic binning was not performed, so it cannot be determined whether GRD33_1 is physically located within Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 or any specific taxon; co-occurrence networks represent correlation patterns rather than direct genomic linkage.
- Evident: the study lacks longitudinal follow-up, and the findings are based on a single population and cross-sectional sample, limiting inference about temporal or causal trajectories.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
60 Own result · 39 Own interpretation · 24 Not checked yet · 13 Own method · 9 No full text of the sources · 6 No basis given · 3 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups.”
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly increased in the moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups.”
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly increased in the moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Microbial diversity increased with fluorosis severity.”
- Also stated in: § Microbial community composition and diversity · plain
“Alpha diversity showed a severity-dependent increase across all taxonomic levels, from phylum to species, as measured by the Shannon index (Figure 2A).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Microbial community composition and diversity · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups.”
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly increased in the moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Network analysis revealed positive correlations among Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, UF levels and GRD33_1 (a carbapenem resistance gene).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups.”
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly increased in the moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris and Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly enriched in the moderate and severe groups.”
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa were significantly increased in the moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Comparative identification of differential microbial species · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“STAMP and MetaStat analyzes further identified 10 differentially abundant species (Figure 4C–F and G).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Comparative identification of differential microbial species
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while Neisseria sicca and Neisseria mucosa were more abundant in the very mild and mild groups, respectively”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Comparative identification of differential microbial species
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and negatively correlated with Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Supplementary Table S3).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Correlation analysis between the study factors and bacteria
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
- Rests on an assumption: Dental fluorosis severity is a valid indicator of chronic fluoride exposure affecting the oral microbiota.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 38
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For instance, Wang et al. demonstrated significant alterations in the oral microbial community structure among adolescents with severe dental fluorosis, compared to those without oral health issues [10].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [10] Wang Q, Chen X, Hu H, et al. Structural changes in the oral microbiome of the adolescent patients with moderate or severe dental fluorosis. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 2897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82709-z 33536555 PMC7859183 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports significant differences in oral microbial community structure between the Healthy group and a combined Moderate/Severe group of adolescents. The Conclusion likewise reports changes in moderate and severe fluorosis compared with healthy teeth, but the passages do not establish a separate result for severe fluorosis alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These species are known to play roles in dental biofilm maturation and oral inflammatory conditions [35,36].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, et al. Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522149113 PMC4760785 26811460 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion describe roles for oral bacteria in dental plaque development, including early colonization and links to later colonizers. The Discussion says that whether the plaque structures studied contribute to oral health or progression toward disease remains a question for future study, so the claimed role in oral inflammatory conditions is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Could not verifycites [36] Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192(19): 5002– 5017. doi: 10.1128/jb.00542-10 20656903 PMC2944498 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 16S rRNA gene clone library-based studies section lists dental-plaque and periodontitis samples, but does not establish that the species meant by “these species” play roles in those conditions. Searches for biofilm maturation and inflammatory conditions found no passage establishing the claimed roles; the species are not identified in the citing sentence provided. (LLM, conf=0.72)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“which has been supported by recent evidence showing that moderate disturbance can maximize microbial diversity in human-associated microbial communities [34].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [34] Paulo AC, Sá-Leão R. Evidence for the intermediate disturbance hypothesis and exponential decay in replacement in streptococcus pneumoniae following use of conjugate vaccines. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 7510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11279-5 35525872 PMC9079081 source
The Discussion reports a peak in pneumococcal serotype diversity at intermediate levels of vaccine uptake in a study of carriage among children in Portugal. This is evidence that moderate disturbance can maximize diversity in a human-associated microbial community. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Previous studies conducted by our team and other laboratories have demonstrated that the supplementation of trace elements, such as copper and zinc, in agricultural environments may lead to an increased incidence of ARGs [13–16].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] Peng S, Zheng H, Herrero-Fresno A, et al. Co-occurrence of antimicrobial and metal resistance genes in pig feces and agricultural fields fertilized with slurry. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 792: 148259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148259 34147788 source
- Partly supportedcites [14] Peng S, Herrero-Fresno A, Olsen JE, et al. Influence of zinc on CTX-M-1 β-lactamase expression in escherichia coli. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2020; 22: 613– 619. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.06.004 32540482 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says zinc oxide feed supplementation may increase antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from animals and their excretions; the References also identify a study reporting more resistance genes in zinc-fed pigs. The discussion (p. 233) links copper to induced resistance and plasmid mobilization, but does not establish that copper supplementation increases the incidence of ARGs in agricultural environments. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [15] Yazdankhah S, Rudi K, Bernhoft A. Zinc and copper in animal feed – development of resistance and co-resistance to antimicrobial agents in bacteria of animal origin. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2014; 25(0). doi: 10.3402/mehd.v25.25862 PMC4179321 25317117 source
The Data source table reports that Cu and Zn exerted selection pressure associated with ARG abundance in feedlot manure and soils. The Conclusion also says trace-metal exposure may contribute to antibiotic resistance and that Zn supplementation in animal feed may increase the proportion of multiresistant E. coli. These passages support the citing sentence’s hedged claim in agricultural settings. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [16] Vahjen W, Pietruszyńska D, Starke IC, et al. High dietary zinc supplementation increases the occurrence of tetracycline and sulfonamide resistance genes in the intestine of weaned pigs. Gut Pathog. 2015; 7(1): 23. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0071-3 26322131 PMC4551370 source
The Results and discussion report increased tetA and sul1 resistance-gene copy numbers in weaned pigs given high dietary zinc. The same section states that heavy metals including copper and zinc can increase antibiotic resistance, supporting the citing sentence’s hedged claim about trace-element supplementation in an agricultural setting. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overall median UF level was 1.1 mg/L (range 0.4–2.6 mg/L)”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Results > Epidemiological characteristics and sequencing overview
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid biomarker of fluoride intake/exposure in children.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared with the Normal and Dubious groups, the Very mild and Mild groups showed a noticeable increase in the number of significant associations, with the Mild group exhibiting the most densely connected network.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 16 biomarkers were identified in the Normal group, 23 in the Severe group, 6 in the Mild group, 4 in the Very mild group and 3 each in the Dubious and Moderate groups (LDA > 3.5, P < 0.05).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Comparative identification of differential microbial species
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among these, Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 exhibited the highest connectivity and co-occurred with 24 ARGs.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Fusobacterium nucleatum and the carbapenem resistance gene GRD33_1 emerged as central nodes and showed strong positive correlations with UF.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yellow edges specifically highlight strong positive associations between UF and three central nodes: Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Fusobacterium nucleatum and the carbapenem resistance gene GRD33_1, which also shows mutual associations among themselves.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most pronounced differences were observed between the Normal and Moderate groups and between the Normal and Severe groups, whereas differences among the Dubious, Very mild and Mild groups were less evident.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Microbial community composition and diversity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant correlations are observed between UF and Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 as well as ARG GRD33_1.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, groups with fluorosis (especially Very mild, Mild, Moderate and Severe) generally showed higher diversity, with the Severe group often demonstrating the highest median values.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Microbial community composition and diversity
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, a recent metagenomic study reported an enrichment of Neisseria sicca in severe dental fluorosis [53], which contrasts with our observed depletion of Neisseria sicca at the species level.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Ajrithirong P, Krasaesin A, Sriarj W, et al. The metagenome and metabolome signatures of dental biofilms associated with severe dental fluorosis. J Oral Microbiol. 2025; 17(1): 2560591. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2560591 41000239 PMC12459186 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Dental fluorosis severity is a valid indicator of chronic fluoride exposure affecting the oral microbiota.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“For example, research by Willis et al. indicated a strong correlation between the composition of tap water and the prevalence of specific bacterial species [11], highlighting the significant impact of drinking water on the oral microbiota.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Willis JR, González-Torres P, Pittis AA, et al. Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition. Microbiome. 2018; 6(1): 218. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0592-3 30522523 PMC6284318 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Fluoride primarily exerts its effects through topical mechanisms, including inhibiting the demineralization of tooth enamel, enhancing remineralization at crystal surfaces (thereby forming a highly acid-resistant layer) and suppressing bacterial enzymatic activity [9].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Featherstone JDB. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999; 27(1): 31– 40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x 10086924
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These actions could alter both the oral microbiota and the composition of the tooth surface.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The observed differences in oral microbiota and resistance are attributable to fluorosis severity/fluoride exposure rather than confounding factors such as water source, diet, or passive smoking.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, excessive fluoride intake through food, beverages, dental materials or supplements [3], particularly during the critical period of dental development [4,5], can lead to the formation of dental fluorosis, which poses a significant threat to oral health [6].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Medjedovic E, Medjedovic S, Deljo D, et al. IMPACT OF FLUORIDE ON DENTAL HEALTH QUALITY. Mater Sociomed. 2015; 27(6): 395– 398. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.395-398 26889098 PMC4733546 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kebede A, Retta N, Abuye C, et al. Dietary fluoride intake and associated skeletal and dental fluorosis in school age children in rural Ethiopian rift valley. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(8): 756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080756 27472351 PMC4997442 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [5] Petersen PE, Lennon MA. Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32(5): 319– 321. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00175.x 15341615 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [6] Green R, Till C, Cantoral A, et al. Associations between urinary, dietary, and water fluoride concentrations among children in Mexico and Canada. Toxics. 2020; 8(4): 110. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040110 33233802 PMC7711675 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“This condition is characterized by hypomineralization of the enamel, manifesting as white spots, yellow to brown discoloration, surface pitting, mottling and increased enamel porosity [7].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Fomon SJ, Ekstrand J, Ziegler EE. Fluoride intake and prevalence of dental fluorosis: trends in fluoride intake with special attention to infants: REVIEW & COMMENTARY. J Public Health Dent. 2000; 60(3): 131– 139. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2000.tb03318.x 11109209 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Willis et al. further demonstrated that long-term fluoride exposure in adolescents is associated with distinct oral microbial profiles and environmental influences such as drinking water [11].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Willis JR, González-Torres P, Pittis AA, et al. Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition. Microbiome. 2018; 6(1): 218. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0592-3 30522523 PMC6284318 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dental fluorosis was diagnosed jointly by two trained dental practitioners using Dean's criteria, with any discrepancies resolved by a third expert.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Materials and methods > Participant recruitment and ethical statement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the six fluorosis severity groups, the dubious group (Dean's score 0.5) comprised only 10 participants. This limited sample size reduced statistical power for comparisons involving this subgroup and increases the risk of type II error (false negative).”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Materials and methods > Participant recruitment and ethical statement
plaindirectn = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, we recognize that the formation of dental plaque is a complex biofilm process influenced by multiple factors, including oral hygiene habits, diet and fluoride use [33].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Rajasekaran JJ, Krishnamurthy HK, Bosco J, et al. Oral microbiome: a review of its impact on oral and systemic health. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(9): 1797. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091797 39338471 PMC11434369 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For most individuals, the primary source of fluoride exposure is drinking water [12].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Martignon S, Bartlett D, Manton DJ, et al. Epidemiology of erosive tooth wear, dental fluorosis and molar incisor hypomineralization in the American continent. CRE. 2021; 55(1): 1– 11. doi: 10.1159/000512483 33440378 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“They possess diverse metabolic capabilities, including the degradation of organic compounds and the production of acidic metabolites such as lactic acid, which can significantly alter the oral pH [39].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Valliappan K, Sun W, Li Z. Marine actinobacteria associated with marine organisms and their potentials in producing pharmaceutical natural products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(17): 7365– 7377. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5954-6 25064352 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that elevated UF levels may be associated with bacterial taxa enriched in ARGs, implying a fluoride-associated shift in oral microbiome resistance potential.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The observed differences in oral microbiota and resistance are attributable to fluorosis severity/fluoride exposure rather than confounding factors such as water source, diet, or passive smoking.
In the paper
“Direct antimicrobial effect: fluoride inhibits sensitive taxa (e.g. Streptococcus, Haemophilus) while favoring tolerant species that possess efficient fluoride export systems [37].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Banerjee A, Kang CY, An M, et al. Fluoride export is required for the competitive fitness of pathogenic microorganisms in dental biofilm models. mBio. 2024; 15(5): e0018424. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00184-24 38624207 PMC11077948 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Functional pathway differences were assessed based on KEGG Orthology profiles derived directly from shotgun metagenomic sequencing data. These profiles represent the relative abundance of functional genes (i.e. functional potential) rather than gene expression.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Materials and methods > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“At first, fluoride exposure may create environmental stress in the oral cavity, and this stress can suppress fluoride-sensitive taxa while allowing fluoride-tolerant species to proliferate, leading to a more diverse community structure [31].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [31] Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci. Vol. 22 S. Karger AG; 2011. p. 97– 114. doi: 10.1159/000325151 21701194
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This differentiation likely arises from interactions within microbial communities and changes in ecological balance during the development of dental fluorosis”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, given that all correlation coefficients had absolute rho values ≤ 0.4, these findings should be interpreted with caution and are not indicative of causal relationships.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beyond its role in oral disease, Fusobacterium nucleatum has also been associated with cerebral small vessel disease and asymptomatic brain injury in patients with ischemic stroke [43,44].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Chen Y, Shi T, Li Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum: the opportunistic pathogen of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 860149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.860149 35369522 PMC8966671 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [44] Patel A, Patel M, Glowacki J. Fusobacterium nucleatum: more than just an oral anaerobe. Cureus. 2022; 7(14): e26989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26989 PMC9386311 35989742 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Metagenomic binning was not performed in this study, and thus we cannot determine whether GRD33_1 is physically located within the genome of Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 or any other specific taxon.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Co-occurrence pattern between UF, ARGs and bacteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“as a well-recognized opportunistic pathogen associated with periodontal disease [43].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Chen Y, Shi T, Li Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum: the opportunistic pathogen of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 860149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.860149 35369522 PMC8966671 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“Additionally, the porous enamel as habitats in dental fluorosis provides distinct ecological niches for microbial colonization, potentially supporting a wider array of microorganisms [32]”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Colombo APV, Do Souto RM, Da Silva-Boghossian CM, et al. Microbiology of oral biofilm-dependent diseases: have we made significant progress to understand and treat these diseases?. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015; 2(1): 37– 47. doi: 10.1007/s40496-014-0041-8
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we also find that UF levels, water intake, drinking water source, sleep duration and various dietary and lifestyle factors may influence changes in the dental plaque microbiota of children.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
In the paper
“Indirect ecological effect: increased enamel porosity and surface roughness in dental fluorosis create retentive micro-niches that protect colonizing bacteria from mechanical removal and alter local nutrient availability, facilitating adhesion of specific species such as Fusobacterium nucleatum[38].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Hu D, Gong J, He B, et al. Surface properties and streptococcus mutans - streptococcus sanguinis adhesion of fluorotic enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2021; 121: 104970. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104970 33202357 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 118 children were initially recruited; however, 22 were excluded due to incomplete survey data or sample collection. Ultimately, 96 children were included in the final analysis.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Materials and methods > Participant recruitment and ethical statement
plainn = 96- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings link fluorosis severity not only to compositional changes but also to functional attenuation of the oral microbiota.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The observed differences in oral microbiota and resistance are attributable to fluorosis severity/fluoride exposure rather than confounding factors such as water source, diet, or passive smoking.
In the paper
“For example, copper has been proven to promote tetracycline resistance more effectively than exposure to tetracycline alone [17].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Song J, Rensing C, Holm PE, et al. Comparison of metals and tetracycline as selective agents for development of tetracycline resistant bacterial communities in agricultural soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(5): 3040– 3047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05342 28198616 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Once dental fluorosis occurs, it is irreversible and can significantly affect a child's oral health as well as their psychological well-being, since the brown stains on teeth are often perceived as unsightly [20,21].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Akuno MH, Nocella G, Milia EP, et al. Factors influencing the relationship between fluoride in drinking water and dental fluorosis: a ten-year systematic review and meta-analysis. J Water Health. 2019; 17(6): 845– 862. doi: 10.2166/wh.2019.300 31850893 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Augustsson A, Berger T. Assessing the risk of an excess fluoride intake among Swedish children in households with private wells — expanding static single-source methods to a probabilistic multi-exposure-pathway approach. Environ Int. 2014; 68: 192– 199. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.014 24747328 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Among these taxa, Corynebacterium matruchotii is a calcifying bacterium that has been associated with urinary tract infections [40] and bacteremia [41], and in rare cases, fluoride-related bone pathology such as tibial osteomyelitis [42].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Rusmir AV, Paunescu IA, Martis S, et al. Encrusted uretero-pyelitis caused by corynebacterium urealyticum: case report and literature review. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(9): 2239. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092239 36140640 PMC9497590 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [41] Bouguerra L, Dupraz C, Plouzeau C, et al. First bacteremia due to corynebacterium gottingense in an immunocompromised child: a case report, 16S rDNA-Based phylogenetic analyses and review of the literature. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(3): 528. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030528 36978395 PMC10044508 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [42] Ansari A, Shoaib D, Asfour M, et al. Corynebacterium minutissimum as a rare cause of tibial osteomyelitis: a case report and literature review. Cureus. 2024; 2(16): e75885. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75885 PMC11738086 39822436 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“Members of the phylum Actinobacteria are widely distributed in various environments, including soil, marine ecosystems and even the atmosphere [39].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Valliappan K, Sun W, Li Z. Marine actinobacteria associated with marine organisms and their potentials in producing pharmaceutical natural products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(17): 7365– 7377. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5954-6 25064352 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar findings have been reported in environmental and animal studies, where metals and chemical compounds (e.g. sodium hypochlorite, artificial sweetener) co-select for resistance determinants in microbial communities [17,55–57].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Song J, Rensing C, Holm PE, et al. Comparison of metals and tetracycline as selective agents for development of tetracycline resistant bacterial communities in agricultural soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(5): 3040– 3047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05342 28198616 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Li X, Yu Z, Ye J, et al. Dual disinfectants synergistically drive adaptation and evolution toward higher antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity in escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(25): 12472– 12484. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c13071 40518995 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [56] Yang G, Cao JM, Cui HL, et al. Artificial sweetener enhances the spread of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion. Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(30): 10919– 10928. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08673 37475130 source
- Not checked yetcites [57] Zhao Y, Cocerva T, Cox S, et al. Evidence for co-selection of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in metal polluted urban soils. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 656: 512– 520. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.372 30529954 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“support the hypothesis that dental fluorosis is associated not only with changes in microbial composition but also with impaired or restructured metabolic potential of the oral microbiome.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Dental fluorosis severity is a valid indicator of chronic fluoride exposure affecting the oral microbiota.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, Rothia dentocariosa, although its direct relationship with dental fluorosis remains unclear, has been implicated in oral leukoplakia [45], endocarditis and meningitis [46].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Amer A, Whelan A, Al-Hebshi NN, et al. Acetaldehyde production by rothia mucilaginosa isolates from patients with oral leukoplakia. J Oral Microbiol. 2020; 12(1): 1743066. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1743066 32341761 PMC7170386 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [46] Elkattawy S, Alyacoub R, Younes I, et al. A rare report of rothia dentocariosa endocarditis. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021; 11(3): 413– 415. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1880539 34234918 PMC8118413 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggests that chronic fluoride intake may exert co-selective stress that favors the proliferation of fluoride-tolerant taxa and the enrichment of ARGs.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a single spot urinary UF measures recent exposure only, not reflecting long-term oral pressure”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Rothia and other Actinobacteria are dominant in the oral microbiome of patients with hematologic malignancies [47]”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Amer A, Galvin S, Healy CM, et al. The microbiome of potentially malignant oral leukoplakia exhibits enrichment for fusobacterium, leptotrichia, campylobacter, and rothia species. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 2391. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02391 29250055 PMC5717034 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the sample size is unbalanced across fluorosis severity groups, with the dubious group containing only ten participants, which may reduce statistical power and increase the risk of type II error.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditionaln = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Specifically, daily tooth brushing frequency (BF) [61], sugar-containing snacks (Sugar) [62], sugary drinks (SD) [63] and starchy snacks (Starch) may impact the composition of the oral microbiota [11]”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Barbe AG, Küpeli LS, Hamacher S, et al. Impact of regular professional toothbrushing on oral health, related quality of life, and nutritional and cognitive status in nursing home residents. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2020; 18(3): 238– 250. doi: 10.1111/idh.12439 32329175 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [62] Haque M, McKimm J, Sartelli M, et al. A narrative review of the effects of sugar-sweetened beverages on human health: a key global health issue. jptcp. 2020; 27(1): e76– e103. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.666 32170920 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [63] Katarzyna G, Alina K, Paweł R, et al. Consumption of sweetened beverages as a risk factor of colonization of oral cavity by fungi – eating habits of university students. Annals of Parasitology. 2015;(3): 175– 182. doi: 10.17420/ap6103.04 26568990
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest that, beyond fluoride exposure, daily behaviors and dietary patterns may modulate the oral microbiome, but due to the weak correlation strengths, these findings are preliminary and require validation in larger, well-controlled cohorts with consideration of potential confounders.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As common members of the healthy oral microbiota and human pharyngeal community [50].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [50] Shan X, Chen S, Bai A, et al. Dynamic pharyngeal carriage of neisseria species in healthy population. Infect Genet Evol. 2024; 125: 105684. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2024.105684 39454929 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This discrepancy may arise from differences in fluoride exposure sources, sampling sites or population characteristics, highlighting the need for harmonized multicohort validation.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neisseria species are generally regarded as beneficial colonizers.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Fluoride is known for its antimicrobial properties; however, many microorganisms have developed fluoride exporters to mitigate its toxic effects [59], which may provide a survival advantage in high-fluoride environments.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] Kouidhi B, Al Qurashi YMA, Chaieb K. Drug resistance of bacterial dental biofilm and the potential use of natural compounds as alternative for prevention and treatment. Microb Pathog. 2015; 80: 39– 49. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.02.007 25708507 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bacterial metabolic pathways play a crucial role in maintaining oral health by supporting microbial balance and host [54].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Ran S, Sun N, Liu Y, et al. Fluoride resistance capacity in mammalian cells involves complex global gene expression changes. FEBS Open Bio. 2017; 7(7): 968– 980. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12236 PMC5494298 28680810 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and our questionnaire's highest frequency category further limits the ability to distinguish higher exposure levels.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“hinting at a possible regulatory role of hydration in the oral microenvironment [60], although this association is modest.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Nascimento MM, Alvarez AJ, Huang X, et al. Metabolic profile of supragingival plaque exposed to arginine and fluoride. J Dent Res. 2019; 98(11): 1245– 1252. doi: 10.1177/0022034519869906 31454264 PMC6755720 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern may suggest a dual effect of fluoride on these bacteria, but the weak correlation precludes definitive conclusions.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This ecological shift disfavors Neisseria and promotes pathogenic taxa, explaining its subsequent decline and the establishment of a more disease-associated ecosystem.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, Haemophilus species are common respiratory pathogen, and oral whole-cell killing of non-typing Haemophilus influenzae have been shown to enhance respiratory tract protection [49].”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Clancy RL, Cripps AW. An oral whole-cell killed nontypeable haemophilus influenzae immunotherapeutic for the prevention of acute exacerbations of chronic airway disease. COPD. 2019; 14: 2423– 2431. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S217317 PMC6821045 31695359 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings highlight the potential impact of UF on oral microbiota and its ARGs characteristics.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
The authors state this as an assumption.
This is the first study to investigate the relationship between urinary fluoride (UF) levels, bacterial taxa and the occurrence of antibiotic resistance.
“Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relationship between urinary fluoride (UF) levels, bacterial taxa and the occurrence of antibiotic resistance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed differences in oral microbiota and resistance are attributable to fluorosis severity/fluoride exposure rather than confounding factors such as water source, diet, or passive smoking.
“suggesting a functional shift under fluoride stress”
“implying a fluoride-associated shift in oral microbiome resistance potential”
The paper relies on this without support.
Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid biomarker of fluoride intake/exposure in children.
“quantitative analysis of UF concentration using the ion-selective electrode method [22]”
“the median UF increased with severity: 0.7 mg/L in Normal, 1.0 mg/L in Dubious, 1.0 mg/L in Very mild, 1.2 mg/L in Mild, 1.2 mg/L in Moderate and 1.4 mg/L in Severe.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Urinary fluoride concentration is a valid proxy for fluoride exposure relevant to the oral microbiota.
“Significant correlations are observed between UF and Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 as well as ARG GRD33_1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Dental fluorosis severity is a valid indicator of chronic fluoride exposure affecting the oral microbiota.
“The abundances of Actinomyces sp. HMT 175, Actinomyces oris, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Rothia dentocariosa increase with the severity of dental fluorosis”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“Following the removal of host-derived sequences, 3,512,285,094 clean reads remained, averaging 3,686,303 reads per sample.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Results > Epidemiological characteristics and sequencing overview
Reported 3686303 · recomputed 36586303.0625
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Correlation analysis between the study factors and bacteria
“increased UF levels or fluorosis severity were positively correlated with higher abundances of Corynebacterium matruchotii and Actinomyces sp. HMT 175 and negatively correlated with Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus pneumoniae”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
“the abundance of Streptococcus pneumoniae decreases with lower UF levels.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Discussion
“In addition, the expression of KEGG functional genes is reduced in moderate and severe groups.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Materials and methods > Statistical analysis
“These profiles represent the relative abundance of functional genes (i.e. functional potential) rather than gene expression.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“resulting in 5,829,699 contigs, with an average of 112,109 per sample.”
§ Severity-dependent alterations in oral microbiota and antibiotic resistance in children with dental fluorosis > Results > Epidemiological characteristics and sequencing overview
Reported 112109 · recomputed 60726.03125
Citations
Cites
Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure
Clarke, K. R. (1993) · Australian Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x · Cited by 14,449
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., & Lam, T. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 · Cited by 10,133
VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology
Dixon, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x · Cited by 7,052
STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles
Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P., & Beiko, R. G. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 · Cited by 4,253
Dewhirst, F. E., Chen, T., Izard, J., Paster, B. J., Tanner, A. C. R., Yu, W.-H., Lakshmanan, A., & Wade, W. G. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00542-10 · Cited by 3,352
Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride
Featherstone, J. D. B. (1999) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x · Cited by 1,017
Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale
Mark Welch, J. L., Rossetti, B. J., Rieken, C. W., Dewhirst, F. E., & Borisy, G. G. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1522149113 · Cited by 968
Mechanisms of Action of Fluoride for Caries Control
Buzalaf, M. A. R., Pessan, J. P., Honório, H. M., & ten Cate, J. M. (2011) · Monographs in oral science · doi:10.1159/000325151 · Cited by 576
Yadav, K. K., Kumar, S., Pham, Q. B., Gupta, N., Rezania, S., Kamyab, H., Yadav, S., Vymazal, J., Kumar, V., Tri, D. Q., et al. (2019) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.045 · Cited by 411
Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach
Petersen, P. E., & Lennon, M. A. (2004) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00175.x · Cited by 328
Antimicrobial actions of fluoride for oral bacteria
Marquis, R. E. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-133 · Cited by 296
Zhao, Y., Cocerva, T., Cox, S., Tardif, S., Su, J.-Q., Zhu, Y.-G., & Brandt, K. K. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.372 · Cited by 272
Oral microbiome: a review of its impact on oral and systemic health
Rajasekaran, J. J., Krishnamurthy, H. K., Bosco, J., Jayaraman, V., Krishna, K., Wang, T., & Bei, K. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12091797 · Cited by 272
Song, J., Rensing, C., Holm, P. E., Virta, M., & Brandt, K. K. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05342 · Cited by 200
Integrated hypothesis of dental caries and periodontal diseases
Nyvad, B., & Takahashi, N. (2020) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2019.1710953 · Cited by 194
Kouidhi, B., Al Qurashi, Y. M. A., & Chaieb, K. (2015) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2015.02.007 · Cited by 180
Crystal Structure of Glucansucrase from the Dental Caries Pathogen Streptococcus mutans
Ito, K., Ito, S., Shimamura, T., Weyand, S. N., Kawarasaki, Y., Misaka, T., Abe, K., Kobayashi, T., Cameron, A. D., & Iwata, S. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.028 · Cited by 174
Amer, A., Galvin, S., Healy, C. M., & Moran, G. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02391 · Cited by 160
Willis, J. R., González-Torres, P., Pittis, A. A., Bejarano, L. A., Cozzuto, L., Andreu-Somavilla, N., Alloza-Trabado, M., Valentín, A., Ksiezopolska, E., Company, C., et al. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0592-3 · Cited by 158
Yazdankhah, S., Rudi, K., & Bernhoft, A. (2014) · Microbial Ecology in Health & Disease · doi:10.3402/mehd.v25.25862 · Cited by 127
Assessing the variation within the oral microbiome of healthy adults
Nearing, J. T., DeClercq, V., Van Limbergen, J., & Langille, M. G. I. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00451-20 · Cited by 117
Valliappan, K., Sun, W., & Li, Z. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5954-6 · Cited by 111
Vahjen, W., Pietruszyńska, D., Starke, I. C., & Zentek, J. (2015) · Gut Pathogens · doi:10.1186/s13099-015-0071-3 · Cited by 99
Fluoride: A review of pre-clinical and clinical studies
Sharma, D. K., Singh, A., Verma, K., Paliwal, S., Sharma, S. K., & Dwivedi, J. (2017) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2017.10.008 · Cited by 98
Fomon, S. J., Ekstrand, J., & Ziegler, E. E. (2000) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2000.tb03318.x · Cited by 89
Profiling the salivary microbiome of the qatari population
Murugesan, S., Al Ahmad, S. F., Singh, P., Saadaoui, M., Kumar, M., & Al Khodor, S. (2020) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02291-2 · Cited by 77
Fusobacterium nucleatum: the opportunistic pathogen of periodontal and peri-implant diseases
Chen, Y., Shi, T., Li, Y., Huang, L., & Yin, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.860149 · Cited by 75
The sampling strategy of oral microbiome
Lu, H., Zou, P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Chen, Z., & Chen, F. (2022) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.23 · Cited by 74
Martignon, S., Bartlett, D., Manton, D. J., Martinez-Mier, E. A., Splieth, C., & Avila, V. (2021) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000512483 · Cited by 71
Artificial sweetener enhances the spread of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion
Yang, G., Cao, J.-M., Cui, H.-L., Zhan, X.-M., Duan, G., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c08673 · Cited by 67
Akuno, M. H., Nocella, G., Milia, E. P., & Gutierrez, L. (2019) · Journal of Water and Health · doi:10.2166/wh.2019.300 · Cited by 65
Kebede, A., Retta, N., Abuye, C., Whiting, S., Kassaw, M., Zeru, T., Tessema, M., & Kjellevold, M. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13080756 · Cited by 58
Peng, S., Zheng, H., Herrero-Fresno, A., Olsen, J. E., Dalsgaard, A., & Ding, Z. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148259 · Cited by 51
Self-citationAugustsson, A., & Berger, T. (2014) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.014 · Cited by 45
Metabolic profile of supragingival plaque exposed to arginine and fluoride
Nascimento, M. M., Alvarez, A. J., Huang, X., Browngardt, C., Jenkins, R., Sinhoreti, M. C., Ribeiro, A. P. D., Dilbone, D. A., Richards, V. P., Garrett, T. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034519869906 · Cited by 45
Acetaldehyde production by Rothia mucilaginosa isolates from patients with oral leukoplakia
Amer, A., Whelan, A., Al-Hebshi, N. N., Healy, C. M., & Moran, G. P. (2020) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2020.1743066 · Cited by 43
Barbe, A. G., Küpeli, L. S., Hamacher, S., & Noack, M. J. (2020) · International Journal of Dental Hygiene · doi:10.1111/idh.12439 · Cited by 39
Effects of Low-Dose Antibiotics on Gut Immunity and Antibiotic Resistomes in Weaned Piglets
Hu, Q., Liu, C., Zhang, D., Wang, R., Qin, L., Xu, Q., Che, L., & Gao, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00903 · Cited by 35
Colombo, A. P. V., do Souto, R. M., Silva‐Boghossian, C. M., Miranda, R., & Lourenço, T. G. B. (2014) · Current Oral Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s40496-014-0041-8 · Cited by 34
Haque, M., McKimm, J., Sartelli, M., Samad, N., Haque, S. Z., & Bakar, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Population Therapeutics & Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.666 · Cited by 34
Green, R., Till, C., Cantoral, A., Lanphear, B., Martinez-Mier, E., Ayotte, P., Wright, R., Tellez-Rojo, M., & Malin, A. (2020) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics8040110 · Cited by 27
Shifts in composition and activity of oral biofilms after fluoride exposure
López-López, A., & Mira, A. (2020) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8 · Cited by 26
IMPACT OF FLUORIDE ON DENTAL HEALTH QUALITY
Medjedovic, E., Medjedovic, S., Deljo, D., & Sukalo, A. (2015) · Materia Socio Medica · doi:10.5455/msm.2015.27.395-398 · Cited by 23
Wang, Q., Chen, X., Hu, H., Wei, X., Wang, X., Peng, Z., Ma, R., Zhao, Q., Zhao, J., Liu, J., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82709-z · Cited by 22
Ikeda, E., Shiba, T., Ikeda, Y., Suda, W., Nakasato, A., Takeuchi, Y., Azuma, M., Hattori, M., & Izumi, Y. (2019) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-019-02805-3 · Cited by 18
Banerjee, A., Kang, C.-Y., An, M., Koff, B. B., Sunder, S., Kumar, A., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00184-24 · Cited by 17
Góralska, K., Klimczak, A., Rachubiński, P., Jagłowska, A., & Kwapiszewska, A. (2015) · PubMed · doi:10.17420/ap6103.04 · Cited by 15
A rare report of rothia dentocariosa endocarditis
Elkattawy, S., Alyacoub, R., Younes, I., Mowafy, A., Noori, M., & Mirza, M. (2021) · Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives · doi:10.1080/20009666.2021.1880539 · Cited by 12
The metagenome and metabolome signatures of dental biofilms associated with severe dental fluorosis
Ajrithirong, P., Krasaesin, A., Sriarj, W., Gavila, P., Chetruengchai, W., Sriwattanapong, K., Manaspon, C., Samaranayake, L., & Porntaveetus, T. (2025) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2025.2560591 · Cited by 12
Fluoride resistance capacity in mammalian cells involves complex global gene expression changes
Ran, S., Sun, N., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Wei, L., Wang, J., & Liu, B. (2017) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12236 · Cited by 10
Surface properties and Streptococcus mutans - Streptococcus sanguinis adhesion of fluorotic enamel
Hu, D., Gong, J., He, B., Chen, Z., & Li, M. (2021) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104970 · Cited by 10
Encrusted uretero-pyelitis caused by corynebacterium urealyticum: case report and literature review
Rusmir, A. V., Paunescu, I. A., Martis, S., Latcu, S., Novacescu, D., Bardan, C. R., Bob, F., Licker, M., Botoca, M., Cumpanas, A., et al. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092239 · Cited by 9
Li, X., Yu, Z., Ye, J., Wang, X., Lin, H., Lei, L., Hu, W., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c13071 · Cited by 9
Clancy, R. L., & Cripps, A. W. (2019) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s217317 · Cited by 8
Influence of zinc on CTX-M-1 β-lactamase expression in escherichia coli
Peng, S., Herrero-Fresno, A., Olsen, J. E., & Dalsgaard, A. (2020) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2020.06.004 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLuo, S., Shao, R., Hong, Y., Zhang, T., Zhou, Q., Zhou, Q., Rao, F., Zhao, X., Dong, Y., Zhu, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1296753 · Cited by 7
Paulo, A. C., & Sá-Leão, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11279-5 · Cited by 6
Dynamic pharyngeal carriage of neisseria species in healthy population
Shan, X., Chen, S., Bai, A., Shi, Y., Song, X., Yin, X., Duan, C., Tang, J., Xia, X., Liu, L., et al. (2024) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2024.105684 · Cited by 6
Fusobacterium nucleatum: more than just an oral anaerobe
Patel, A., Patel, M., & Glowacki, J. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.26989 · Cited by 4
Bouguerra, L., Dupraz, C., Plouzeau, C., Michaud, A., Broutin, L., Cremniter, J., Burucoa, C., & Pichon, M. (2023) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12030528 · Cited by 3
Ansari, A., Shoaib, D., Asfour, M., Wang, X., & Sharma, P. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.75885 · Cited by 2
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., Peng, S., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Ye, Y., Liu, M., Shang, L., Cui, X., Wang, P., & Ding, Z.
- Affiliations
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- Nanjing Medical University (CN)
- Department for Environmental Health (Endemic Disease Control and Prevention), Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xia, Yuting
- Wang, Peihua
- Ding, Zhen
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Microbiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-08-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2714622-2714622
- ISSN
- 2000-2297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13528121
- OpenAlex
- W7204638396
- Semantic Scholar
- 7ef7295ba5c5c2dc0f2d60a7b25a000fbfef589e
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Oral Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Jiangsu Province Association of Endemic Diseases Scientific Research Project on Schistosomiasis, Parasitic Diseases, and Endemic Diseases (Grant No. X202119, X202358)
- The Scientific research project funded by Jiangsu Commission of Health (M2022069)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
- Keywords
- dental fluorosis, oral microbiota, antibiotic resistance genes, fluoride exposure, dental plaque, fluorosis severity, Actinomyces, Fusobacterium nucleatum, carbapenem resistance, microbial diversity, children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review